PDA

View Full Version : Biden in Pakistan to ASSIST the Voterigging


Mohammed Hassan Al-Moayad
19th February 2008, 09:03 PM
The US had to send Joseph Biden and John Kerry to oversee elections in Pakistan.



My thoughts are that they were present to allow the rigging of elections. Allowing Bhuto's party sans Bhutto to come across to seem to have enough of a representation to advance the Bhutto / Musharraf alliance the United States had always wanted. And, that this will only give legitimacy to the scheme. So, Musharraf will stay and Bhutto's widower husband will sanction a newer improved Musharraf remaining on in power.



Delaware Senator Joe Biden is no friend to liberty and free expression. He has made his career protecting his main benefactor, DuPont Chemical Corporation. His "solution" for Iraq, the notorious "three state solution" sounds suspiciously like his own native state, Delaware; New Castle County in the north, Sussex County in the south and Kent County in the middle. The 'three county' solution Biden has been used to all his life.



Overseeing 'elections' in Pakistan could not had been a serious concern of the United States of America if they had sent America's most notorious corrupt politician to watch over the vote rigging. Vote rigging to allow America its Asif Zadari Parviz Musharraf blended safeguard against dangerous religious Muslims getting too near to Pakistan's reins of power.



Joe Biden and John Kerry had a job to do. They had the task given them to 'pull it off,' and make it look like it had been a free and fair election.



- - - Just like they are going to make it look like a 'free and fair election' had given the world two administrations of President John john Bomb Bomb McCain to carry on his war against overly serious Islam !

Suhaib Jobst
20th February 2008, 05:09 AM
I am just tired of American politicians believing they have the moral authority to judge other political systems. This includes the massive fraud known as "democracy", which does not exist anywhere in the world including in the USA.

The founders of the U.S. actually spoke out against democracy and were clear that the system they were setting up, was a REPUBLIC. How can these politicians be entrusted with judging the "democracy" of other countries' elections, when they are too dumb to even realize their own system?

I do agree with you that there is much corruption, especially when it comes to "senior" politicians who have been in office for decades representing states with large corporations (such as Delaware). There has to be a large level of payoffs, lobbying or back-room dealings between the bureaucrats of each party (which are essentially two faces of the same agenda). It is designed to ensure the status quo, locking out anyone who may serve the interests of the people against those of the Corporations.

Brother_Mujahid
20th February 2008, 05:11 AM
Sen. Joe Biden is your typical neo-liberal, and his foreign policy activities have reflected that. As was noted, has advocated the break-up of Iraq, as well as its initial invasion, and was a supporter of the late, and highly corrupt Benazir Bhutto, as well as being closely associated with AIPAC and a stanch supporter of the Zionist regime.

See:

http://www.counterpunch.org/jacobs09272007.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/brown04272007.html