umar bin khatab
8th March 2008, 11:19 AM
Assalaamualaikum Warahmutallahi Wabarakatuh,
So, who said you cant have any religious whores? Apparently, Raafidi Shias already have them. They actually encourage their women to become religious, professional whores. The Raafidi Shia Imams tell false virtues to trap the women and misguide them. Instead of explaing and talking about it, read the fatwa yourself. Heres the pic of the fatwa followed by the translation of the fatwa, Insha'Allah:
http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e200/Mr_GQ/shia_fatwa.jpg
Translation:
(Note: The words in the parenthesis are not a part of the fatwa. They were added to explain what some terms mean, Insha'Allah.)
Mister Mujahid Muqtada As-Sadr,
We are a group of believing Zaynabiyaat (i.e. women devoted to Mut'a in Rafidah religion) who support Jaish Al-Mahdi, and we need to ask Mister Imam Muqtada As-Sadr that some members of Jaish Al-Mahdi sent us an invitation to attend a party of group Mut'a one of Husayniyaat (i.e. Where these dogs bark every night).. And they claimed that the rewards compensated by group Mut'a are more 70 times than single Mut'a.
We went to ask one of the Sada (i.e. a high religious rank in Rafidah religion) that was a deputy of Shaykh Muhammad Al-Yaqoubi about group Mut'a, but he denied any knowledge about such a type of Mut'a, and he said it was an innovation.
So is it legitimate for us to perform group Mut'a? knowing that it will be only a few hours (less than a night time), and that the main goal of this party is to fulfil the desires of Jaish Al-Mahdi's members. exclusively on those who cannot marry due to their hard work fighting the Nawasib (i.e. They call Sunnis Nawasib). And the profit gained by this party will be sent to Jaish Al-Mahdi to arm them with weapons.
Answer us, May Allah reward you!
=================================
The answer:
It is well known that Mut'a marriage is legitimate and blessed in our sect, but the Nawasib try to prevent us from it lest we generate rapidly and become a huge power.
For this reason we call our sons not to take any precaution regarding Mut'a.
And the group Mut'a is one of the things that were legitimated by our great Imams, taking your precautions not to allow any non-muslim to enter these parties, or anyone from the masses, not to look at the nudity of our believing women. And I think this is the reason for why Shaykh Muhammad Al-Yaqoubi hated it.
And it is well known also that having Mut'a with a soldier of Jaish Al-Mahdi has more rewards than any other man, because he sacrifice his blood for the sake of Imam Mahdi.
For this reason we ask the Zaynabiyaat to grant them (i.e. the soldiers) the grace of body and money Allah bestowed on them (i.e. the Zaynabiyaat).
And we ask the sister Zaynabiyaah to go to one of our authorized agents to take permission to hold such parties, to be well-watched and full controlled by Jaish Al-Mahdi.
And may Allah reward you all.
http://clearblogs.com/AllAboutGQ/19931/Religious+Whores.html
So what are the some benefits of group prostitution
1- Fulfils the desire of mehdi soldiers
2- Helps in multiplication of rafidis
3- The reward is double.
4- Money to buy weapons to fight nasibis
5- More bastards available for recruitment for fighting nasibis
Masha Allah there must be many other benefits
Precaution
1-Not to allow any non-muslim to enter these parties, or anyone from the masses, not to look at the nudity of our believing women.
Masha Allah what a chaste ladies indeed!!
qadri
8th March 2008, 07:09 PM
references:
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2006/12/05/29660.html
http://www.shatharat.net/vb/showthread.php?t=7496
or click here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%D8%B2%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA+%D8%A 7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA+ %D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4+%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%87% D8%AF%D9%8A&btnG=Google+Search
flashback: Asharites want to reconcile and unite with Shias
( remember the Asharite Hadith Master Abdullah al-Habashi al-Hariri sect Ahbash issued similar fatwa regarding Muta..
I wonder what excuses Dr. GF Haddad has for his misguided masters ??
state of Haal ? or is it wajd ? or is it new kashf ?
Sunni and Shi`a seek reconciliation
Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani
View as PDF
At a time when the need to establish unity between Muslims has never been greater, will differences due to Islamic schools of thought explode into a war intended to destroy Muslims from within?
The enemies of Islam say this war is inevitable and has been postponed many times. Now at the end of the 20th century the chance for such a war to erupt is at perhaps the highest level in history. The reason: today's 1.5 billion Muslims are divided into a number of groups as predicted 1400 years ago by the Prophet (s), "My Ummah will be divided into 73 different groups." This prediction is now clearly manifest to Muslims concerned that impending war is being instigated between the three major Islamic groups, comprised of:
The Sunni school, or Ahl as-Sunna wal-Jama`at, known as the traditional majority mainstream of Islam, consisting of 1.35 billion Muslims around the world.
The Shi`a school of thought, which consists of 150 million Muslims around the world. The majority of Shi`a live in Iran, followed by Iraq, Pakistan and small numbers in other nations.
The "Salafi"/Wahabi school, a new ideology created in the 18th century, whose influence has expanded in the 20 th. Branching out radically from the Sunni mainstream of Ahl as-Sunna wal-Jama`at, it essentially constitutes a new sect. Ostensibly Sunni, the sect's literalist interpretation of Islam labels anyone with different beliefs as non-Muslim.
Though the latter sect numbers no more than 50 million out of the world's 1.5 billion Muslims (3 percent), its influence is tremendous. This is due to extensive funding by certain oil-rich Arab nations. With this support, members of the sect have founded a network of Muslim organizations with headquarters in Egypt, Sudan, the U.K., the U.S., France, Afghanistan and now in Albania, Chechnya, Uzbekistan and Tajikstan. Taking leadership from Osama Bin Laden, Omar Abdur Rahman, Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Omar al-Bakri and other figures, these activist groups are often blamed for disturbing peace and provoking terror, particularly in Central Asia, where Islam is enjoying a tremendous revival after the fall of communist regimes.
"Salafi"/Wahabi extremist groups are not reticent to state that their intentions are to foment "Islamic" revolution in Muslim countries. Their methods are to destroy domestic peace via terrorist acts and to provoke Muslims to fight amongst themselves by emphasizing differences in belief. Anyone with knowledge of Islamic history cannot fail to discern what appears to be a conspiracy, the intended result of which is to cause Shi`as and Sunnis, already at odds on a theological level, to become open enemies, what would result in a massive war between 1.35 billion Sunnis and 150 million Shi`as. Citing the objective of "eliminating terrorism", the purpose of this conspiracy appears to be none other than causing an immense war between Muslims.
We must ask: will such a war burst forth between the Sunnis of Pakistan and Afghanistan on one side and Iran on the other? Emotions have already flared between the two. Today 200,000 Iranian Shi`a soldiers stand at the border between Iran and Afghanistan, facing the Pakistan-supported Sunni army of the Taliban. In March of 1998 the "Salafi" Imam al-Hudhayfi of the Prophet's Mosque in Madina al-Munawwara in his Friday prayer sermon denounced the Shi`a as unbelievers while former Iranian President Rafsanjani sat as his nation's guest among the attendees at Friday prayer. If Afghanistan's Taliban were to follow these sentiments, it may be that such a clash is inevitable.
With interest in the Caspian region growing daily, as more and more of its oil wealth is discovered, it will surprise no one to know that a scheme designed to destabilize the entire region, is being "played" on what today's superpower nations view as the "Great Mid-Asian chessboard." Many of today's Islamic thinkers believe superpowers stand to benefit from such a war exploding in Middle Asia: it would serve to destroy the image of Islam, and for the 2nd time
in this century, allow the superpowers to redraw the map of that region in their favor.
With this potentially devastating situation in front of us, we must ask: are the differences between the Shi`a and Sunni schools so divisive as to bring about such a war? Is the conflagration which blazed up in the first century after the Prophet (s) going to be rekindled fifteen centuries later, with equally tragic results? If there exist such grave differences between the Shi`a and Sunni, what are they and why should they cause such discord? Will such a war benefit anyone other than those who seek to divide the Umma and purvey weapons of war to both sides?
We addressed these concerns to the well-known Arab theologist Dr. Muhammad Imara of al-Azhar in Cairo, Egypt. He gave the following response.
Are the Different Schools of Thought an Affliction?
It is easy to avoid discussing the differences in the Ummah but it is impossible to remove them and say that all will accept the same ideology and school. Whoever thinks that the Muslim Ummah can one day be free of schools of thought, is in fact an enemy of freedom and diversity, or believes in an idealistic dream which is, in reality, impossible to expect. For stifling intellectuality and preventing different ways of thinking about religion from being expressed, in essence imposes dictatorship on religion, confining its scope utterly. Such tyranny in religious thought is rejected. Saying 'no' to differences only eliminates intellectual freedom and destroys the opportunity for the genius of Islam to appear.
Islam views diversity as one of Allah's Sunan, His Pattern of creation of humankind in a vast and varied array.
Allah swt said, "Verily the ends ye strive for are diverse." [92: 4] and He informed us, "...and they shall continue to differ." [11: 118] and He said, "To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people…" [5: 48] And He said, "And among His Signs is the … variations in your languages and your colours…" [30: 22]
Here the Quran reminds us that diversity and multiplicity are Allah's Way. Absolute Oneness applies to Allah alone-for all that is other than Him diversity is the primary condition: human or jinn, animal or plant or solid or gas. Therefore the existence of different schools of thought is not aberrance as the "Salafi" school maintains, but is in fact expected according to our varying natures. If we say there must be only one school of thought and one opinion, then there must be only one thinker-one mind. But, as there are many disparate ways of thinking-approach and interpretation-the result is different schools of thought, giving life and strength to the religion.
Without diversity in thinking in Islam, competition is eliminated. If all people followed a single opinion, the result would be the death of reason and the elimination of human intellectuality and genius. Intellectuality requires competing stimuli and the exchange of ideas in order to function. The appearance of different schools of thought is the fruit of that mental and spiritual labor (mujahada). The result of this struggle is to create opinions and interpretations that move with the time and locale, while at the same time conform with the maqasid ash-shari`ah-the intent of Divine Revealed Law.
Scholars and jurists agree that creative jurisprudence, Ijtihad in classical terminology, is necessary at all times and the creative jurisprudence of one scholar cannot be a reason to prevent the creative jurisprudence of another scholar. We see there have been and continue to be many revivers of faith, who reawaken mankind to the perfect Islamic religion which the Prophet (s) brought. Islam's dynamic aspect is its ability to accommodate the conditions of every century, and this is the fruit of Ijtihad and the schools such dynamism brings.
What is Ijtihad?
Ijtihad is that a scholar try his utmost to extract a judgment based on the principles of jurisprudence. The result might be superlative or it might be flawed, depending on the scholar and his ability to extract rulings from what he has learned, using his intellect and spiritual insight (baseera). This is termed al-fikr al-dhanni-what is thought to be correct. Thus whatever effort a scholar exerts in extracting a juristic ruling, it will never be absolute, relative to another scholar. Ultimate correctness is with Allah alone.
The result of this Ijtihad in the Sunni tradition was to create the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i and Hanbali schools of jurisprudence. In the Shi`a tradition it resulted in the Ja`fari school and several others.
What is Unity in Principles?
Islam is unique as a world religion in that one does not find in it differences in the essential infrastructure or in its fundamental practices. All Muslims agree on the Oneness of God (tawheed), in the prophecy of Sayyidina Muhammad (s) and all messengers, in the absolute Divine perfection of the Qur`an as Allah's last revealed word to mankind. Similarly, there is no disagreement among Muslims on what constitutes its pillars of worship: the testification of faith, prayer, fasting, poor-due and pilgrimage. Thus the fundamentals, the Usul of Islam, are identical regardless of school and this constitutes its trunk. It is only in the branches that differences exist.
The consensus of scholars is that there are five main principles on which religion is founded. However within each principle interpretation, Ijtihad, may be exercised according to the methodology of the school being followed and the intellect of the scholar. These principles are:
The Muslims are a single nation speaking different languages.
The Muslims are of different nationalities and tribes, but all hold one religion.
All Muslims share the same kind of civilization but each nation observes a different culture.
All Muslims follow one Divine Revealed Law (shari`ah) which does not change with time and place, but jurisprudence and schools of thought vary within this overarching Shari`atic framework.
We are one Muslim nation around the world, but there exists a diversity of different states. All these states drink from the fountain of this Nation: the same `aqida, beliefs, and the same Shari`ah.
These five principles unify the Muslim nation. Schools of thought thus operate in the branches of religion, not in the trunk. The principles of Oneness, Usul al-tawhid, are the same for all. The Usul cannot be changed, but the manifestations of these Usul in action and law might differ. Divergence in Usul are rejected. Thus a wrong understanding of the Oneness of Allah is rejected. Similarly if a group of Muslims states "terrorism is part of Islam" they have diverged from the consensus of Muslims.
If differences in branches are allowed, thus admitting of multiple schools of thought, from where comes this age-old antagonism and conflict between the Shi`a and Sunni?
The Shi`a comprise at least ten percent of the Umma. There are no essential differences in practice between the Shi`a and the Sunni: they worship fundamentally the same. Both groups pray, fast, pay poor-due, make pilgrimage and read the same Qur`an. The differences originate in something that goes back to history.
Jurisprudence (fiqh) is the science of the branches of religion. Therefore you see that the Shaykh al-Azhar of Egypt Shaykh Mahmoud Shaltout, issued a verdict that eight schools of thought are accepted in Islam: these are the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, Hanbali, Abadi, Zaydi, Dhahiri and Ja`fari. When Egypt published the Islamic Encyclopedia of Jurisprudence they put in it the verdicts of these eight schools of thought. Shaykh Shaltut issued the verdict that each group may pray behind the other since their differences in thought are only in the branches.
According to all eight of the accepted schools of thought, differing in issues of Usul puts someone outside of faith (iman). From here comes the sensitive issue that prevents full concord and remains a source of friction between the Shi`a and the Sunni.
Today's world conspiracy seeks to use this difference to provoke antagonism. This is the issue of Imamate. In the Shi`a school the Imamate is part of the Usul, an essential principle of being Muslim. Therefore, according to their school, whoever does not accept the Shi`a principle of Imamate is outside Islam. Unless the Sunni and the Shi`a resolve this issue, powerful nations may employ this difference to instigate a fight between the Muslims.
What is Imamate?
The theory of Imamate relates to the leadership of the Muslim nation. The Shi`a believe that leadership of the Muslim nation belongs solely to Sayiddina Ali (q) and after Sayyidina Ali (q) it was ordained to be among his descendants through As-Sayyida Fatima (q). The Shi`a took the hadith in which the Prophet (s) says, "For whomever I am leader, Ali must also be his leader" and "O Allah! Support whoever supports Ali and punish whoever comes against Ali," as proofs that the Imamate must be for Ali (q) alone.
The Sunnis, on the other hand, said that Imamate is determined through consultation of a religious advisory council (shura) and the pledge of allegiance (baya`) by the people for they must choose who governs them. For Sunnis, leadership is a matter to be agreed upon among the whole Ummah, whereas the Shi`a made it a part of their creed. Therefore, according to the Shi`a belief, anyone who opposes the Imamate opposes Islam, as leadership is designated by Divine revelation and is thus something in which there can be no discussion or choice.
Shaykh al-Azhar Mahmoud Shaltout issued a verdict that eight schools of thought are accepted in Islam:
Hanafi,
Maliki,
Shafi`i,
Hanbali,
Abadi,
Zaydi,
Dhahiri and
Ja`fari.
Coming Together on Common Ground
It is accepted that among the Shi`a scholars are many geniuses and highly intellectual personalities. We find among the Sunnis the same great intellectuality. Thus, it is essential in this century-in which great enmity to Islam and opposition to it by many forces has manifest-that we come together and stop fighting on these issues. No doubt in Shi`a heritage there are things which upset Sunnis just as the Sunni legacy contains aspects that agitate the Shi`a. The Shi`as' statements against Abu Bakr (q) and Umar (q) are considered reprehensible by Sunnis. Similarly, some Sunnis such as Ibn Taymiyya, Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab, and others made statements unacceptable to Shi`as. However, as long as dialogue is maintained, the possibility exists to solve these problems behind closed doors among the scholars of different schools.
Is it not better to stand united in front of the whole world, in a global society linked by networks and computers? See how the Christians, who once fought and killed each other are now standing all together under the Assembly of World Churches. Look at the Jews with their many different divisions and groups, all disagreeing with each other, yet they come together when danger faces them.
So we call all sincere Muslims to open wide the doors between different schools of thought. Let us not support a plot that might explode into war between the Shi`a and Sunni, because of the extremism of a new group calling themselves "Salafi," who terrorize people around the world in the name of Islam, and create an excuse for retaliation against all Muslims.
In a global society linked by networks and computers is it not better to stand united?
In history we have never seen a religious war between the Shi`a and the Sunni, though political conflicts occurred, incited by different parties outside the Muslim nation. Now we do not want to see a war between Afghanistan and Iran. We know the common people hold sentimental attachment to their beliefs, and might react out of zealotry, but at the level of leaders and intellectuals we must see an accommodation in order to defuse this crisis.
As the Taliban are pressured to adopt the narrow "Salafi" school, it may only be a matter of time before we see its harm begin to rebound on the nations from which it arose. The governments which supported this school are now being attacked by the very people they promoted. At the same time religious nationalism fills the streets of Iran. If a war between the Shi`a and Sunni burst forth its only result will be to destroy Islam with Islam, kill Muslims by Muslims. This conspiracy within Islam is now expanding and sincere Muslims must realize that the extremist terrorists who use the religion and practice the "Salafi" ideology are the greatest threat to peace in the Muslim nation. ?
© 2001, Islamic Supreme Council of America
http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/extremism/muslim_unity.htm
----
May Allah protect us from Jahmi influenced misguided Asharites and their allies Ithna A`shari Jaafari Shias.
Ali Rida
leo
8th March 2008, 10:20 PM
I don't think there will be any war between Pakistan and Iran, not in foreseeable future atleast. Iran feels itself isolated. Their traditional relations with India are also in cold storage, the precise reason of India not accepting gas pipeline project, which is likely to be matured between Iran and Pakistan. Iran despite its religious differences with Pakistan is however compelled to maintain minimum essential diplomatic relations with Pakistan, given its isolated standing in the world.
If we analyse Iranian military muscle, it is negligible as compared to nuclear capable Pakistan. Even comparison between conventional forces clearly indicates that Iran is nowhere close to Pakistan. So to expect that there can be any war between these two countries seems impossible. Iranians are busy consolidating their gains in Afghanistan and increasing their influence in Middle East by supporting Hezbollah and HAMAS for their own agenda, aimed at weakening Arabs in ME affairs.
zaid_ibn_ali
9th March 2008, 01:02 PM
Please brothers, only post something if its been verified by a reliable source. I'm not saying this hasnt somewhere, but nothing as yet has been put up. Also ahmedjbh you put up something of al dimashqiya saying he admitted being homosexual, yet a sister pointed out he never said that in the video. I'm not sure what the truth is as havnt seen any replies yet, but this tit for tat needs to stop.
Both sides need to verify what they post.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.