PDA

View Full Version : Story of Sodomy written using Qur'anic verses


umar bin khatab
9th March 2008, 09:19 PM
Brothers and sisters who read the heading will soon think it must be the jews or christians who have done that. But I believe such thing would not have even come in their wildest taughts. So the question is who must have done it?

The one who did that are non other than the greastest enemies of Islam who know the book (Qur'an) and pretends to be highly respected scholars. Of course filthy Rafidi dogs


And the dog responsible for this is Yousuf al-bahrani (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Al_Bahrani), this dog is a great rafidi scholar who is well-known for his attacks on Qur'an and believe that it is a tampered book.

In his blind enemity towards the book of Allah he used its verses to write story of Sodomy between a man named abu nuwas and a beautiful boy.

[ ÇáßÔßæá / Ì 3 – Õ 83 ] Al-Kashkool Vol.3 page 83
http://takhzin.maghrawi.net/lwaat.jpg

Translation of the book (Kashkool) of cursed dog yousuf al-bahraini:


In literature about Abu Nuwas that while he was passing by the door of library he saw a beautiful boy so he said: “blessed be Allâh, the Best of creators.”
Surah 23:14

The boy said: “For the like of this let the workers work.”
Surah 37:61

Abu Nuwas said: “We wish to eat thereof, that we may satisfy our hearts and know that thou hast spoken truth to us, and that thereof we may be witnesses.”
Surah 5:113

The boy said: “You will not attain unto piety until you spend of that which you love.”
Surah 3:92

Abu Nuwas said: “So appoint a meeting between us and you, which neither we nor thou shall fail to keep, at a convenient place.”
Surah 20:58

The boy said: “Your appointed meeting is the day of the festival, and let the people assemble when the sun has risen (forenoon).”
Surah 20:59


So Abu Nuwas waited till Friday and when he came he saw the boy playing with children.

So Abu Nuwas said: “And who fulfill their covenant when they make it.”
Surah 2:177

So the boy walked along with Abu Nuwas into a hidden room.

Abu Nuwas felt ashamed to ask the boy to sleep.

Abu Nuwas said: “Those who remember Allâh (always, and in prayers) standing, sitting, and lying down on their sides.”
Surah 3:191

The boy said: “Embark therein, in the Name of Allâh will be its moving course and its resting anchorage.”
Surah 11:41

So Abu Nuwas mounted upon the kid and hurt him !!!!!!

So the boy said: “Verily! Kings, when they enter a town (country), they despoil it, and make the most honourable amongst its people low.”
Surah 27:34

And close to them there was an old man listening to the speech of the kid and Abu Nuwas and seeing what they were doing. So directing his speech to Abu Nuwas he said:

“Then eat thereof and feed therewith the poor unfortunate.”
Surah 22:28

The boy replied: “Allâh burdens not a person beyond his scope.”
Surah 2:286

Niqaabis
9th March 2008, 09:25 PM
That's really sick

May Allaahs curse be upon him

May he burn in hell forever aameen

leo
9th March 2008, 09:30 PM
They are perverted community, I don't have any doubt about that.

SAINT GEORGE OF ARABIA
9th March 2008, 09:34 PM
ya akhi i dont mean to offend you but what do you gain from following and
reading what these people are doing?

don't you think it's diversion from real knowledge?
shia are attention seeking idiots who enjoy every kufr act they commit and they love it when people like you waste time debating them.

it might look like nothing to you but wasting time talking about these traitors will cost you an ayyat of quran or even a hadith.

i believe you are also a knowledge seeker ya akhi

becareful and dont follow the diversion of shaytan who happened to be the
real shia imam. he's happy to see you giving attention to their filth and missing out on real knowledge.

Abd al-Haqq Marshall
9th March 2008, 10:59 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Al_Bahrani

"Sheikh Yusuf bin Ahmed Al Bahrani (1695-1772) was a Bahraini theologian and a key figure in the intellectual development of Shiaism."

Not surprising.

umar bin khatab
10th March 2008, 04:52 AM
ya akhi i dont mean to offend you but what do you gain from following and
reading what these people are doing?

don't you think it's diversion from real knowledge?
shia are attention seeking idiots who enjoy every kufr act they commit and they love it when people like you waste time debating them.

it might look like nothing to you but wasting time talking about these traitors will cost you an ayyat of quran or even a hadith.

i believe you are also a knowledge seeker ya akhi

becareful and dont follow the diversion of shaytan who happened to be the
real shia imam. he's happy to see you giving attention to their filth and missing out on real knowledge.

akhi, do you know that there are many sunnis who consider shias to be brothers in faith?

do you know that there are man shias who are open minded and accept truth when it comes to them?

Then all this material is for them.....sunnis to know the reality of shias and for shias to abandon this sick preverted religion and accept the real Islam.

umar bin khatab
3rd May 2008, 04:38 PM
To rafidah on board, is this filthy dog muslim or kafir?

Nu7
3rd May 2008, 04:40 PM
Don't expect them to answer your question.

abu imaan an-nepalee
3rd May 2008, 04:52 PM
To rafidah on board, is this filthy dog muslim or kafir?

no brother they love him!

here is an article from a mainstream rafidite site which praises him: http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/articles/articles/37.html


Under this hadith, Muhadith Al-Bahraini (May his soul rest in peace) (who died 1186 A.H)

la'anat ALLAH 'alayh!

abu imaan an-nepalee
3rd May 2008, 04:57 PM
http://www.shiachat.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=66597

here he is a reference for their batil fiqh

umar bin khatab
3rd May 2008, 05:55 PM
I know brother, he is highly respected among the tyre-head community. you can very well see a whole page dedicated in his praise, his teachers, his students, other great scholars who spoke highly about him. etc

http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/ola/index.php?mod=rezvan&id=66

The page starts with this

Shaikh Yousuf al-Bahrani (Allah sanctify him)
(1107-1186 a.h)

I just wanted to exposes those filthy rawafid (logic and his reptile crew) who deceitfully claim they believe in this Qur'an.

Their failure to show up in this thread is itself biggest proof of their lies.

Nu7
3rd May 2008, 06:31 PM
If they were truthful, they would indeed have made takfeer of this filthy kaafir. May Allah (swt) Curse him.

ibn 'abd al-jabbaar
3rd May 2008, 07:22 PM
i doubt our resident rafidis would do so though... their standard response to anything is "vahabi lies!" :rolleyes:

zaid_ibn_ali
3rd May 2008, 07:28 PM
lets see what their reply (if any) will be...

abu imaan an-nepalee
4th May 2008, 12:37 AM
these guys are saying he is an akhbari not usuli? http://www.muslimyouth.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=129882#129882

whats that about?

umar bin khatab
4th May 2008, 04:12 PM
these guys are saying he is an akhbari not usuli? http://www.muslimyouth.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=129882#129882

whats that about?

Oh and about the so called proof you gave me

that scholar is a Akhbari. Akhbari's beliefs are not within Islam. The Ithna ashariyah Usuli do NOT associate with the Akhbari's OR their beliefs.

Thats ridiculous

http://www.al-shia.com is ithna ashari rafidi kuboori site. And this site contains page dedicated just to their scholars and we can find name of this dog in that list of names
http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/ola/index.php?mod=rezvan

Nu7
20th May 2008, 07:07 AM
Brothers, maybe this Rafidhi helper of the shaytaan (La3natullahi 3alayh) was a magician and he was doing this to get closer to the jinn?? This is what the magicians do.

From the book "The World of The Jinn and Devils", by Dr. Umar S. al-Ashqar Translated by Shaykh Jamal Ud-Din Zarabozo:

"Those who believe that they have been granted special powers and consider themselves special devotees of Allah are actually just being served by the devils. There is no doubt that they get close to the devils by way of what they love of disbelief and idolatry. Ibn Taimiya says that many of those people write the Word of Allah in impure substances and they invert the letters of the Quran, either the words of surah al-Fatiha, al-Ikhlas or other verses. And they write the Word of Allah in blood or other impure substances. And they write or make other statements that are pleasing to Satan.’

If they say or write what is pleasing to the devils, then the devils aid them in satisfying some of their desires, such as transforming water
or transporting them in the air to some places. Or they might steal wealth from other treacherous people who do not mention Allah’s name over it and bring it to some of their selected friends and so on."

http://www.hoor-al-ayn.com/Books/JinnDevils.pdf

kamals
20th May 2008, 02:15 PM
Someone asked about the specific issue of the Akhbaris vs. Usulis, in the 1600 -1700's there was a split in the scholars of the Shia, the Usulis were, ina sense rationalists and believed in using dhann in deriving rulings.

In this post there is no support of the Shia, lest anyone wonder I am ahl ul-Sunnah. The purpose of this post is historical clarifications of facts.

The Akhbaris rejected using qiyas, reason and dhann - in fact they rejected any sort of ijtihad in deriving rullings, and argued that ahkam could only be established based on the dhahiri sense of the text according to the words apparant meanings, without taw'il. They also reject tafsir of the Quran by any of the later community, accepting only the tafsir from their early Imams fro the ahl ul-bayt. They ONLY accepted the Quran or verified narrations from the Shia Imams. They were opposed to the State in Persia, viewing the Shah as an illigitimate ruler in a sense since they believed that an Islamic State could only be established under the Imam Mahdi.

The Usulis believed in using Qiyas and ijtihad in deriving rulings, they were the ones who developed the doctrine of Wilayat al-Faqih and tended to believe that in the absence of the 12th Imam members of their community could and should rule using ijtihad to derive rulings which the masses were obliged to make taqlid of.

There is a third group, the Shaykhis, they are not significant in the context of this discussion. They are concerned with matters of inner illumination and marifa and are few in number.

There you have it in a nutshell, the differences between the Usulis and Akhbaris.