Is this true ?

[Umm Ahmed]

As salaamu 'alaykum

I do not know what to make of this article, as the authors name suggests he is a Jewish Individual.

http://www.malaysia-today.net/blog2006/reports.php?itemid=8786

If its true then we need to really step up giving dawaa.

[Abiumar]

As salaamu 'alaykum

I do not know what to make of this article, as the authors name suggests he is a Jewish Individual.

http://www.malaysia-today.net/blog2006/reports.php?itemid=8786

If its true then we need to really step up giving dawaa.

Wa 'alaykum assalaam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh.

Yes it's true, the shee'ah raafidah are using various means to gain the upper hand over the Sunni Muslim world.

I can't wait for America to attack Iran.

[Abu Maysara]

It is true, but the figures mentioned in the article are somewhat exaggerated in my opinion.
The article mentions some scholars that previously lashed out against rawaafed but their silence is the trademark of today. And therefore, it is a mystery why people, scholars and their followers, who both wrote articles/books as well as conducted lectures informing about the kufr of rawaafed...these days they are the ones condemning the Mujahideen fighting the Rawaafed in Iraq. This is the main physically battleground between Ahl Sunnah and Rawaafed in an area where Iran is trying to increase their influence and only Allah swt knows where they are going next. The issue of Iraq is more important than ever and most Muslims are ignorant of the consequences of Rawaafed taking over the whole country. May Allah swt silence the false scholars who poision the minds of muslims by discouraging them from going forth but instead encourage muslims to turn in brothers to the authorities.

[Salsabil]

It is true, but the figures mentioned in the article are somewhat exaggerated in my opinion.
The article mentions some scholars that previously lashed out against rawaafed but their silence is the trademark of today. And therefore, it is a mystery why people, scholars and their followers, who both wrote articles/books as well as conducted lectures informing about the kufr of rawaafed...these days they are the ones condemning the Mujahideen fighting the Rawaafed in Iraq. This is the main physically battleground between Ahl Sunnah and Rawaafed in an area where Iran is trying to increase their influence and only Allah swt knows where they are going next. The issue of Iraq is more important than ever and most Muslims are ignorant of the consequences of Rawaafed taking over the whole country. May Allah swt silence the false scholars who poision the minds of muslims by discouraging them from going forth but instead encourage muslims to turn in brothers to the authorities.

sahih! May Allah guide us to what He loves!

[leo]

I can't wait for America to attack Iran.

They will not. Their war is against Islam and Muslims, not against Rafida mushriks, who are ever eager to become instrumental in fulfilment of their nefarious aims and objectives. What we are witnessing is merely an exchange of politically hostile statements, aimed at fooling the entire sunni community.

[ibn 'abd al-jabbaar]

The Shi'i propaganda machine is pretty organised and well-versed in deception - this includes their internet activities, which must undoubtedly receive Iranian funding. Just look at how much of their rubbish spills out onto websites like Wikipedia.

[Brother_Mujahid]

I blame the Muslim Brotherhood for a lot of this. Their political stupidity and gross ignorance of the Islamic creed has served as a back door for the filthy rawafid movement to spread disbelief and heresy among the masses. I think these leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood should be taken out and lashed. When a lay Muslim sees figures like al-Qaradawi and Muhammad Mahdi 'Akif on the TV lavishing praise on the Iranian stooge Hasan Nasrullah and his gang of criminals what are they to think?

[Abiumar]

They will not.

No one is safe from a lunatic.

[Abu Abdallah al-Bulghari]

Wa 'alaykum assalaam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh.

Yes it's true, the shee'ah raafidah are using various means to gain the upper hand over the Sunni Muslim world.

I can't wait for America to attack Iran.

Are you insane? According to scholars most simple people in Iran ARE Muslims.

Clear your enemy priority list, people, who seriously think that the rule of American Taghoot (like, Shah) is better than rule of Ayatollahs.

I bet the same people are talking about voting for lesser evil in European countries.

[leo]

No one is safe from a lunatic.

Due to the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, resulting into overthrow of the Taliban and Saddam Regimes and subsequent emergence of Rafida Govts in both the countries have actually helped Iran expand its zone of influence in Middle East and South Asia.

The Americans want mainstream Muslims to become Persian, because Persians believe that jihad would be started by their 12th Imam on his appearence from the cave in naked form :D

This concept suits and conforms to American interests, since they want mainstream Muslims to forget about jihad and resistance against unjustifiable occupation of their lands.

[abu_ibrahim]

Are you insane? According to scholars most simple people in Iran ARE Muslims.

Clear your enemy priority list, people, who seriously think that the rule of American Taghoot (like, Shah) is better than rule of Ayatollahs.

I bet the same people are talking about voting for lesser evil in European countries.

Who told you the majority of people in Iran were Muslim? Also actually having a puppet ruler like the Shah was better for the Sunni population in Iran. He allowed the freedom of worship for all. However under this current regime, the Sunni people are being persecuted. There are approximately 1 million Sunni in Tehran, but are not allowed to have a Masjid there. Some used to pray in a Pakistani school on Friday's, but the authorities closed it down. The Balochi people have suffered greatly under this Mushrik government. The Balochi Sunni struggle to even get into Universities. You should check what brother Abu Muntasir says on the matter who is from Iran. If an enemy like Iran and USA fought, it would be good for Ahlus Sunnah in Iran.

[Nu7]

I know that the Shi'ah here in Denmark are quite active in their Da'wah to Kufr. Some guys tried that with my brother lol and although he wasn't that knowledgeable at that time his fitrah and his knowledge of Tawheed saved him, Alhamdulillah. They have fooled many muslims with their propaganda and there are several cases of muslims converting to shi'ism here in Denmark.

I also know of some people who were offered money to go to Iran and study "Islam", and then they were told to go back home and spread what they learned. I know of some Somalis who accepted the offer and they are now back in their home-villages in Somalia spreading Shi'ism.

It is about time that muslims started educating themselves on correct 'Aqeedah (especially Tawheed!) and the kufr of the Shi'ah. Many muslims think that shi'ism is a legitimate islamic sect. Most people will think you are lying when you tell them that the Shi'ah worship their imams, curse the Sahabah (RA) and the Mothers of the Believers (RA) and believe that the Qur'an is incomplete etc..

[Nu7]

These statements doubtlessly reflect the two scholars' deep frustration with the Shi'a. Both had strongly supported Hezbollah in its war with Israel despite the reservations of other prominent Sunni clerics. A leading Saudi Wahhabi cleric, Shaykh Abdullah Bin Abd al-Rahman al-Jabrin, for instance, had issued a fatwa asserting that it was a sin to join, support or pray for Hezbollah. He said the group was infidel, being Shi'a, and doing the bidding of Iran, which was seeking to spread its influence in the region. In response to this fatwa, both Qaradawi and Awdah had defended Hezbollah unequivocally. They ruled that the Shi'a were good Muslims and an integral part of the Muslim nation. They also drew a distinction between the Shi'a of Iraq, whom they viewed as fanatics, and those of Lebanon, who they said were not.

Qaradawi had long advocated rapprochement (taqrib) between Sunnis and Shi'a, arguing that the differences in their jurisprudence pertained to secondary matters rather than to principles of faith. He even had a prominent Shi'a scholar, Ayatullah Muhammad Ali Taskhiri--secretary general of the Iranian-backed Al-Majma' al-Alami lil-Taqrib bayna al-Madhahib al-Islamiyyah (International Institute for Rapprochement Among the Islamic Legal Schools)--appointed as one of his deputies at the International Union for Muslim Scholars.


IS THIS TRUE???:confused:

What kind of misguidance is this?? Insha'Allah I hope it is all false.

[abumuwahid]

IS THIS TRUE???:confused:

What kind of misguidance is this?? Insha'Allah I hope it is all false.

This is not surprising at all. The man did after all say that Christians are believers.

[abumuwahid]

I blame the Muslim Brotherhood for a lot of this. Their political stupidity and gross ignorance of the Islamic creed has served as a back door for the filthy rawafid movement to spread disbelief and heresy among the masses. I think these leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood should be taken out and lashed. When a lay Muslim sees figures like al-Qaradawi and Muhammad Mahdi 'Akif on the TV lavishing praise on the Iranian stooge Hasan Nasrullah and his gang of criminals what are they to think?

Add to that the unwavering alliance between the leaders of the Sunni lands and the Americans. Add again the silence and inaction concerning Occupied Palestine by these same leaders as opposed to Iran's support for Hamas and Hizbullah, both staunch enemies of the zionists.

Doesn't look good for the Sunnis right?

[Brother_Mujahid]

Abu 'Abdullah, take a look at this thread: http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showthread.php?t=13007

[Brother_Mujahid]

Shaykh Abu Muntasir al-Baluchi on the condition of Ahl as-Sunna in Iran.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gT8_GbRgb2I&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gT8_GbRgb2I&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Abiumar]

Are you insane? According to scholars most simple people in Iran ARE Muslims.

Clear your enemy priority list, people, who seriously think that the rule of American Taghoot (like, Shah) is better than rule of Ayatollahs.

I bet the same people are talking about voting for lesser evil in European countries.

The Raafidah Shee'ah make up 90 percent of Iran's population and it is known that the Raafidah are disbelieving kuffaar worse than the jews and the christians.

[Bilal]

This is not surprising at all. The man did after all say that Christians are believers.


strange. if christians are believers, then what was the point in islam and what is the point in being a muslim?

[Bilal]

I blame the Muslim Brotherhood for a lot of this. Their political stupidity and gross ignorance of the Islamic creed has served as a back door for the filthy rawafid movement to spread disbelief and heresy among the masses. I think these leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood should be taken out and lashed. When a lay Muslim sees figures like al-Qaradawi and Muhammad Mahdi 'Akif on the TV lavishing praise on the Iranian stooge Hasan Nasrullah and his gang of criminals what are they to think?


masha'allah, a just statement, in my opinion. wallahu alam

[Abu Abdallah al-Bulghari]

The Raafidah Shee'ah make up 90 percent of Iran's population and it is known that the Raafidah are disbelieving kuffaar worse than the jews and the christians.

Actually majority of the scholars consider only Shia' ulama's to be out of the fold of Islam. Laymen Shia are not considered non-Muslims. This opinion has been expressed not once here at forums.

[Abiumar]

Actually majority of the scholars consider only Shia' ulama's to be out of the fold of Islam. Laymen Shia are not considered non-Muslims. This opinion has been expressed not once here at forums.

The raafidah as a whole are branded as kuffaar, no one differs regarding this. It is not right to say, 'the scholar is a kafir, but the layman is an innocent muslim!'

Nay, the truth with us is that takfeer can be applied to the 'layman' aswell as the scholar.

This is because it is not only the scholar from the raafidah who calls upon other than Allah ta'ala, reviles the sahaaba (radiAllahu 'anhum), rejects the authentic sunnah (amongst other acts and beliefs amounting to kufr and shirk) but so does the layman (from the rawaafidh).

Concerning these vile ones al-Imaam Ibnu Taymiyah (rahimahullah) said, "They are more evil than most of the people of desires, and they are more deserving of being killed than the Khawaarij." (Majmu' al-Fataawa 28/482)