Shi'ism exposed

[Madarijas-Salikeen]

Shi'ism exposed

http://books.themajlis.net/node/21



The entire edifice of Shi`ism is raised on the single basis of HATRED FOR THE SAHAABAH of Rasulullah (sallallahu alaihi wasallam). Right from the inception of Islam to this day, there has not been a Kaafir, including Rushdie, who has displayed so much hatred and who has spat so much venom and vituperation against the Sahaabah. The Ummah has not seen such implacable foes of the Sahaabah as the Shiahs, whose wird and wazeefah are ‘la-nat’ for the Sahaabah (radhiallahu anhum).

In Shi`i ideology da`wah is directed only towards the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama`ah — the followers of the Sahaabah. The Shi`i concept of dawah and tableegh does not bring Kuffaar, i.e. other Kuffaar besides the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jam`ah, who are ‘Kuffaar’ according to Shi`ism, within its ambit. It is for this reason that history has not observed any Shiah muballigheen inviting Kuffaar in general to Islam. That is because Shiahs have no true Islam to follow. The thrust of their ‘tableegh’ is directed to only the Ahlus Sunnah whom they conspire to convert to Shi`ism by intrigue, corruption, fitnah and deception.

In the chain of deception which Shiahs had originated from the earliest time of their birth is the publication of falsehood in the attempt to lure ignorant and unwary Sunnis into their fold. Every now and again, especially since the rise of Khomeini`ism, books and pamphlets containing all their falsehood are circulated to deceive the Ahlus Sunnah. A variety of stratagems is employed in their literature to make their falsehood palatable to ignorant members of the Ahlus Sunnah. This category - ignorant members of the Ahlus Sunnah - constitutes the most fertile ground for planting the seeds of Shi`i schisms and the baatil of their religion.

In this book which has been prepared by the Fadhl of Allah Ta`ala, most of the falsehood, slanders, fabrications and accusations against Rasulullah (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) and the Sahaabah (radhiallahu anhum) are answered. It is essential that the followers of the Sahaabah study this book carefully to ensure that they are equipped with adequate knowledge to rebut the slanders and calumnies of those whose chief occupation is to revile the Sahaabah. May Allah Ta`ala accept this humble effort of these sinful servants who have pledged to protect the honour of the noble Sahaabah and of Islam.

Was-salaam

MUJLISUL ULAMA OF SOUTH AFRICA
Muharram 1421
April 2000

[saifah]

akhi

everyone knows shia are just filthy liars and sahabi haters
i mean honestly the only people who like shia are themselves
you will never hear ahlul haqq saying they ar good people with good intentions who love ALlah His messenger sallAllahu alayhi wassalam and the sahaba
they are a waste of time and i heard something about digging into the ignorant kuffr that people attribute to islam (other sects) and about how bad it is inshaAllah i will try to find the lecture i heard it in and qoute what the sheikh says
but after i heard it i stoped looking into the weird things sects do and what they believe afterall do we have time to waste on devients wen we ourselveds have not perfected our knowledge

[Abu Hafsa]

Thanks for the link, i was pondering about shias again and wanting to keep some responses in my head against their filfth. Jazakallah Khayr.

[safdl]

One person who surpasses most to de-veil the shia for their practices is non other than umar bin khataab. I dont know where he is at the moment but i pray he is in good health.

[leo]

I noticed too that he is missing in action. May be because of his commitments and busy schedule. May Allah keep him in the best of health and happiness.

[ahmedjbh]

lol, i havent seen anything so baseless since honey i shrunk the kids.

make israel proud boys, keep up the propaganda for the zionists.

[Abu Ilyas]

lol, i havent seen anything so baseless since honey i shrunk the kids.

make israel proud boys, keep up the propaganda for the zionists.

ahmedjbh,

You must be very stupid or you regard sunnis to be very stupid if you are asking us to beleive that the Shia do not have a continuous history of hatred towards the vast majority of the Sahabah.

And by the way we are not your allies against the Zionists. The Shia and the Zionists are both our enemies. You are not on the side of the Muslims. You are for yourselves as you have demonstrated throughout history. If you want to be on the side of the Muslims, embrace Islam and then welcome.

[ahmedjbh]

ahmedjbh,

You must be very stupid or you regard sunnis to be very stupid if you are asking us to beleive that the Shia do not have a continuous history of hatred towards the vast majority of the Sahabah.

And by the way we are not your allies against the Zionists. The Shia and the Zionists are both our enemies. You are not on the side of the Muslims. You are for yourselves as you have demonstrated throughout history. If you want to be on the side of the Muslims, embrace Islam and then welcome.

I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia, and i havent read any shia book that tells me to hate any sahaba.

Now I beleive sunnis to be muslims, as well as shia, and they are united against a common enemy the zionists.

I dont support the zionist tactic of divide and conquer.

[asharee_salafi]

I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia, and i havent read any shia book that tells me to hate any sahaba.

Now I beleive sunnis to be muslims, as well as shia, and they are united against a common enemy the zionists.

I dont support the zionist tactic of divide and conquer.

but u do that in Iraq.

lets just agree that whoever call sthe sahabah kuffar are kuffar themselves, lets agree thatt anyone that beleives that the Qu'ran the sunnis have is missing bits to it, is an outright kafir, lets agree that in worship such as du'a, only Allah can be called upon without intermedirries, and lets agree that there is nothing about Imaamah in Qu'ran...hence why the madhi will come and bring the complete Qu'ran...Agreed?

[Abu Ilyas]

I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia,

Lets assume you are telling the truth. But to suggest as you did that it is baseless that Shia hate the sahabah is grossly ignorant or deliberately deceptive. I don't know which one you are.

My beef is not against the partisans of Ali, the proto Shia if you like but my problem is with the shiasm which has developed as mainstream in Iran and Iraq which certainly hates the majority of the Sahabah and has done so for hundreds of years and besides hating and making takfeer on the Sahabah has innovated much shirk, kufr and innovation.

Go educate yourself.

[Muslim4life101]

I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia, and i havent read any shia book that tells me to hate any sahaba.

Now I beleive sunnis to be muslims, as well as shia, and they are united against a common enemy the zionists.

I dont support the zionist tactic of divide and conquer.


:D
You dumb taqiyahist.
Do you really think muslims will believe what you say just because you are under taqiyyah?
I have made perfect research on shiasm,and spoke to twelvers on rafidhachat.All of them provided sahih shia narration so they have agreed upon that shias disassociate themselves from enemies of ahlulbayt,all of them said that majority of sahaba were nasibis ,specially the senior ones(Abu Bakr and Umar radiyallah anhum) amongst sahaba.
According to shiasm Aisha r.a was nasibi,thus munaafiq(lowest level in hell).
I see this as little kufr.
The biggest kufr which followers of shia religion are quilth of is SHIRK SHIRK and SHIRK.

[ahmedjbh]

whats the point in discussing anything with such arrogant people like this guy above me?

[al-Ansaari]

Assalaamu 'alaikum,

akhi, the fact of the matter is ar-Raafidah hate the majority of as-Sahaabah; this is a well established fact. The comment you made is either out of ignorance or decpetion, as akhi Abu Ilyas said.

[Muslim4life101]

whats the point in discussing anything with such arrogant people like this guy above me?


May Allah save us from arrogance and deceitfulness(taqiyyah).

Proof me wrong that al rafidhas love the companions,dont make takfeer on them(saying that they left islam,became apostates),dont make takfeer on Aisha r.a(saying she is nasibi,in shiasm nasibis are worst creatures) as you claimed.
Produce your evidence if you are truthfull,ya ibn saba!

[melo061]

I dont support the zionist tactic of divide and conquer.

You foool, we were never unified and will never be unified. Your religion is Kufr. We do not unite on religious grounds with people like that.

Repent and inshallah we will unite.


Ps. The best outcome for us is that Iran and Israel blow eachother off the map.

[alijan1001]

I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia, and i havent read any shia book that tells me to hate any sahaba.

Now I beleive sunnis to be muslims, as well as shia, and they are united against a common enemy the zionists.

I dont support the zionist tactic of divide and conquer.

WHAT THE SHIA BELIEVE ABOUT THE COMPANIONS OF THE PROPHET (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam)

*

Mullah Muhammed bin Yaqoob Kulaini, the most prominent Shi'ite scholar of Hadith, quotes Imam Baqir as saying:

'People became apostates after the death of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam), except for three people: Miqdad ibn Aswad, Abu Dharr Ghifari and Salmaan Farsi.' He continues:

'Abu Bakr and Omar did not repent before they parted the world. In fact, they did not even mention what they had done to Ali. So may Allah, His angels and all of mankind curse them. (Furu'ul Kafi: Kitabul Rauda: 115)

*

Mullah Baqir writes:

'Regarding the doctrine of' 'Tabarri' we believe that we should seek disassociation from four idols namely, Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and Mu'awiyah; from four women namely, Ayesha, Hafsa, Hind and Ummul Hakam, along with all their associates and followers. 'These are the worst creation of Allah. It is not possible to believe in Allah, His Messenger and the Imams without disassociating oneself from their enemies. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 2:519)

[The doctrine of 'Tabarri' means to have no association with the enemies of Allah.]

*

Mullah Baqir writes:

'One should say after each prayer: O Allah! Curse Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman, Mu'awiyah, Ayesha, Hafsa, Hind and Ummul Hakam. (Aynul Hayat: 599)

*

The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam), came to a person from the Ansaar and asked him if he had any food. The Ansaari said he had and slaughtered a goat. The man then grilled some meat and presented it to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) who wished that Ali, Fathima, Hasan and Hussain were present with him. Then Abu Bakr and Omar arrived. Ali also arrived shortly after. Allah then revealed the verse:

'We have never sent any messenger prophet or Muhaddath before except that when ever they desired something, the devil interfered in their desire.' (The Prophet then said) This is just as the devil has sent his two agents here right now (Abu Bakr and Omar). (The footnotes of Maqbool's translation: Surah Hajj: 674)

[Muhaddath is a non-prophet but he is inspired by Allah]

*

Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes:

'Pharaoh and Hamaan refer here to Abu Bakr and Omar. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 342)

The same author also says:

'The references in big books about the illegitimate birth of Omar cannot be discussed in this book. (Ibid: 259)

*

Allah says in Surah Nahl (90):

"And He prevents you from immorality, unlawfulness and rebellion.'

Ali ibn Ibrahim AI-Qummi comments on this verse:

'These three vices refer to so and so, so and so and so and so.' (Al Qummi's commentary: 218)

Any ambiguity is cleared by the following comment: 'Immorality refers to the first person (Abu Bakr); unlawfulness refers to the second (Omar) and rebellion refers to the third (Uthman). (Footnotes to Maqbool's translation: 522)

*

Mullah Baqir narrates a story from Imam Zainul Abideen that a man came to the Imam and asked him to inform him about Abu Bakr and Omar. The Imam informed him that they were both non-believers. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 551)

All The Sahaba Kiraam Radiyallahu Anhum Are Kaafirs and Apostates (Na'udhu billah).

The shi'ite scholor of Hadith, Ni' matullah Jazaa-i-rii writes in the 'Anwaare nomaaniyyah' page 245, vol.2.: "The shia Imaamiyyah are of the opinion that the khilafah of Hazrat Ali (Radiyallahhu Anhu) is by nassi jalli (clear text) and all the sahabah (Radiyallahu Anhum), are kafirs, and continue to slander them. They (shias) believe in the imaamah of Jafar Sadiq, (Rehmatullah Alayhi), and his sinless offspring. The author of this book belongs to this group and only this sect is successful and saved (from jahannum). Abii Jafar (Imaam Baqir) says that after Rasulullah, (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam), all the sahaba became murtid (turn apostate) apart from these: Miqdad Bin Aswad, abu Zar Ghafari and Salaman Farsi (Radiyallahu Anhum). They refused to make Bayah (pay allegiance) to (Sayyidinaa) Abu Bakr, (Radiyallahu Anhu), until they called Amirul Momineen. He made Bayah. Then the three of them also made bayah. Hence all agreed upon the khilaafah of (Sayyidina) Abu Bakr. [Usol-e-kafi, vol.2.; Raudah kaafi, page246; Rijal Kashi, page 504.]

IN QUOTATIONS :

1.) They say all Sahabah (R.A) companions except 3 left Islaam after demise of Nabi (S.A.W).
2.) They say Abu Bakr(R.A) Umar(R.A) and Uthmaan (R.A) robbed Ali(R.A) of his position of being Khalif.
3.) They say Umar(R.A) was a 'Original Kaafir' and 'Zindiq'-renegrade.
4.) "Abu Huraira (R.A) was one of the fuquaha, but god knows what judement he falsified for Muaw'iyya and others like him, and what damage He inflicted upon Islaam."
5.) They say Abu Huraira (R.A) used to fabricate Ahadith.
6.) They say Muawiyya (R.A) poisoined Hassan(R.A).
7.) They say Muawiya (R.A) was a tyrant opressive ruler.
8.) They say Qazi Shurray (R.A) used to issue judicial pronouncement in favour of the ruling party. He was a sinful wretch occupying position of Judge.
9.) One should dissociate with the 4 idols: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, Muawiyya and 4 women Ayesha, Hafsa, Harid, Umm- al- Hakam.
10.)One should curse the above after each prayer.
11.) Pharoah and Hamaan refer here to Abu Bakr and Umar.

References:
(1.) Anwaar - No'maan Niyyah - P245. Vol 2. Nimatullah Jafaari./ Furu Kafi, Kitaabul Raudah :15 - Mullah Muhammad bin Yaqoob Kulaini Vol 3 P115/ Usul -e-Kafi Vol 2, P 246 Rijaal Kashsi P504. (2.) Al- Ihtijaaj - Tibrasi 83, 84./Haqqul Yaqeen, P 157. (3.) Haqqul Yaqeen , 551/Kashful Asraar P119. (4.) P 143 - Islam goverment. (5.) Islaamic Goverment (6.) Al-Anwaar un Nomaniyyah - Vol 2. P88-87 Jazaari.(7.) Ibid. (8.) P81, Isl/ gov. (9.) Haqqul Yaqeen- Vol. 2 P519/ Furru Kaafi P342 Vol 3/ Jilaa - ul- Uyoom -P45 - 46/ Hayaatul Quluub P 375. (10.) Ainul Hayaa P559. (11.) Haqqul Yaqeen P342.

12.) Faathima should complain about Ali's big stomach, no wealth and bad features.
13.) Abu Bakr and Umar are Kaafirs
14.) Abu Bakr is calf on Bani Israel.
15.) Ali is a mosquito and a fly.
16.) What did the Zuleikha of Makkah, Bibi Ayesha have, that the 50 year old Nabi (S.A.W) got moved to her.
17.) Nabi (S.A.W) accepted (in marriage) an uncouth person such as Hafsa. Not withsatanding the fact that she was a widow and facially deformed.
18.) Imaan refers to Ameerul- Mu'mineen (Ali), Kufr refers to Abu Bakr, fisq(weakness) refers To Umar, isyaan(disobedient) Usman in Surah Hujuraat.
19.) Umar is an illegeitimate child.
20.) Abu Bakr and Umar are worse than Shaithaan and they are dwellers of Jahannam.
21.) "When I entre Makkah and Madinah as the conqueror, my first duty will be to go to the grave of Huzoor (S.A.W) and exhume the bodies of the two idols."
22.)"We shia's know the three Sahabah's(Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan) as being void of Imaan"

References:
(12.) Mullah Baqir - Jilal Uyoon- 58 Chapter on Faathima.(13.) Haqqul Yaqeen - P552. (14.) Haqqul Yaqeen - Tafseer Qummi P160. (15.) Tafseer Qummi P29. (16.) Haqeeat Fiqh Hanafi P64 /Ghulaam Hussain Naqui.(17.) Ibid P124.(18.) Usul-e- Kafi P229. Vol 2.(19.) Tazkiratul Aimma - P103-4.(20.) Haqqul Yaqeen - P509 - 510.(21.) Kitaab be Noujawanaan - P8.( 22.) Tajalliyaar-e-Sadaqaat - P201- Muhammed Hussain Dhelvi.

MORE ABOUT SHIA'ISM AND SAHAABAH :

The most authentic book of theology of Shi'ism is Al-Jamiul Kafi. In this book in the section, Kitabur Raudha', the following narration is attributed to the fifth Shi', Imam:

"After Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) all people became murtads (reneged from Islam) except three persons - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Tharr Ghifari and Salman Farsi Radiallahu Anhum wabarakatuhum). "

In the Shi'i book, Kitabur Raudhah, the following narration is attributed to Imam Baqir who allegedly made the statement in reply to his disciple who had sought the Imam's opinion regarding Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma)

"What are you asking me about them (Abu Bakr and Umar)? Whoever among us (i.e. the Ahle Bait or the progeny of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) departed from this world, departed in a state of extreme displeasure with them. The elders among us admonished the younger ones to perpetuate it (i.e. this displeasure with Abu Bakr and Umar), Verily, the two of them have unjustly usurped our right. By Allah! These two were the first to settle on our necks (i.e. the necks of the Ahle Bait). Therefore, may the la'nat (curse) of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on the two of them.

(Kitabur Raudhah, Page 115)

In the same book, on the same page appears the following:

"Verily. these two elders (Abu Bakr and Umar) departed from this world without having made taubah for what they had perpetrated against Ameerul Mumineen Alayhis Salaam. In fact, they did not even think of us (of their wrongs against Hadhrat Ali). Therefore, the la'nat of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on them."

In the Shiah book, Rijal Kashi, Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are denigrated in the following narration attributed to Imam Baqir:

"Whatever murder is committed in Islam, whatever unlawful wealth is earned and whatever adultery is committed until the appearance of our Imam Mahdi - the sin of all this is on the necks of the two (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). (Rijal Kashi, page 135)

In Kitabur Raudhah on pages 159/160, the Shiahs attribute a narration to Hadhrat Salman Farsi (Radiallahu Anhu) in which it is claimed that on the occasion when the oath of allegiance was given to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), the first person to swear allegiance to him was an old man who stepped forward crying:

"All praise to Allah who has not caused me to die yet, enabling me to see you on this pedestal. Stretch your hand. " Thus he (Abu Bakr) stretched his hand and the old man took the oath of allegiance (at his hand)."

According to the narration, when Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) heard this from Hadhrat Salman (Radiallahu Anhu), he asked:


"Do you know who he (the old man who took the oath of allegiance) is?"

When Salman (Radiallahu Anhu) replied in the negative, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) allegedly said:

o

"That was Iblees, Allah has cursed him."

Thus, according to Shi'ism, the first being who accepted the Khilafat of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) was Iblees who placed his hand in the hand of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu).

At the end of this narration in Kitabur Raudhah, the following words are attributed by the Shi'i priests to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

"Then, they (a group of the Saqeefah Bani Saidah) will come to the Musjid (i.e. Musjid-e-Nabawi) and the first to swear allegiance to him (i.e. Abu Bakr) on my Mimbar will be Iblees, the La'nat of Allah on him. Iblees will appear (on that occasion) in the form of an old man and say so (i.e. what Salman Faarsi has allegedly said)."

Mullah Baqir Majlisi is a renowned personality in Shiah circles. He is regarded as a top-ranking Muhaddith. He flourished in the 10th century of the Hijri era. The Shi'i clergy has accorded him the title, Khatamul Muhadditheen (the seal of the Muhadditheen). His works are regarded as highly authoritative by the Shiah priests. Khomeini has praised and recommended his writings. This Shi'i priest, in his books, writes the following statements whenever he mentions the name of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu)


"Umar Bin Khattab - on him be la'nat (curse) and athab (punishment).

This, then is the Shi'i attitude towards the beloved Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

This Mullah Baqir Majlisi has mentioned in his book, Zadul Ma'ad, numerous virtues and excellencies of the 9th of Rabiul Awwal. According to Baqir Majlisi, the significance and excellence of 9th Rabiul Awwal are because "Umar, the enemy of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the enemy of the Ahle Bait" will be killed on the 9th Rabiul Awwal. It is for this reason that the 9th of Rabiul Awwal should be observed as a great occasion of happiness and festivity according to Shi'ism. The relevant part of this fabricated narration attributed by the Shiah to the famous Sahaabi, Hadhrat Huzaifah (Radiallahu Anhu) is as follows:

"Huziifah Bin Yaman narrates: Once on the 9th of Rabiul Awwal I went to Rasulullah. I saw Ameerul Mu'mineen Ali Murtaza, Imam Hasan and Imam Husain also there. All were busy eating. Rasulullah smiling in great happiness said to Hasan and Husain: 'Sons, today is the day on which Allah will destroy your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather, and Allah will accept the curse of your mother (Fatimah). Eat sons, eat I Today is the day that Allah accepts the deeds of your Shiah (partisans), and beloved. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when the power of your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather will be broken and annihilated in the dust. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when Fir'on to my Ahle Bait, the one who will oppress and persecute them and who will usurp their rights, will be destroyed."

Huzaifah said: I exclaimed: 'O Rasulullah! Will there be such an evil person in your Ummah, who will perpetrate such villainy?'

Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah!

Among the munafiqs (hypocrites) there will be one idol who will be the leader of the group of munafiqeen. He will carry in his hand the whip of cruelty and injustice; he will prevent people from the Path of truth; he will alter the Qur'an; he will change my Sunnah and my ways; he will oppress my Wasi (Appointee), Ali Bin Abi Talib and he will deprive my daughter, Fatimah of her rights. My daughter will then curse him. Allah Ta'ala will accept her la'nat (curse) and prayers.' Huzaifah then said: 'O Rasulullah! Why do you not supplicate to Allah to destroy this Fir'on and oppressor in your very lifetime?'

Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah! I do not regard it proper to interfere in the decisions of Allah Ta'ala... But, I have requested Allah Ta'ala to grant excellence and superiority to that day when that oppressor and Fir'on is dispatched to Jahannum (e.i. when he is destroyed). That day should be decreed superior to all other days so that honoring of that day becomes a Sunnah for my Shiane Ahle Bait (i.e. partisans of my family). Allah Ta'ala then sent this Wahi (revelation):

'It has already been decreed in My Eternal Knowledge that the usurping Munafiqs will persecute you and your family. They will inflict many hardships on you and your family. O Muhammad! Ali has been awarded your rank because of these (impending) hardships which will be perpetrated on him by the usurper of his rights and the Fir'on of this Ummah. I have commanded the angels of the seven heavens to rejoice and celebrate Eid on the day he (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) is killed - this is for the sake of the partisans and lovers of the Ahle Bait. I have commanded the recording Angels to cease recording the sins of My servants for three days from that day. This is in honor of that day (on which Hadhrat Umar will be murdered). O Muhammad! Three days grace and permission in general to commit sins have been given in your honor and in honor of your appointee (Ali) ... Every year on this day, will I free from Jahannam thousands of your Shiahs.' Huzaifah says: 'After Rasulullah said this, he arose and left the room and went to the house of Umme Salmah. After having heard this talk of Rasulullah I was convinced of Umar's kufr. There remained no doubt in this. Finally, after the demise of Rasulullah, I witnessed the fitnah which he (Umar) created. He exhibited the kufr which was concealed in him. He reneged from Islam and usurped the Imamate and Khilafate. To achieve this end he adopted the most shameless methods. He altered the Qur'an and burnt the holy house of Rasulullah. He pleased the Jews, Christians and the Magians and displeased Fatimah and the entire Ahle Bait, and he conspired to have Ameerul Mu'meen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali) murdered. He made haram what Allah had made halal and legalized what Allah had made unlawful. He slammed the door against the face and stomach of Fatimah Alayhis Salaam. Huzaifah then said:

'Finally Allah Ta'ala accepted the curses of His Holy Nabi and his daughter in regard to this Munafiq (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) and had him killed at the hands, of his killer (Abu Lu'lu' Irani). May there be the Rahmat (Mercy) of Allah on his (Umar's) killer."(Zadul Ma'ad - Pages 433-436)

Needless to say, this whole narration, from beginning to end, is a colossal fabrication of the Shiah enemies of the Sahabah in general, and of the first three Khulafa (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan) in particular. Shi'i priests are notorious for the fabrication of narration's which they impute to such great men of Islam, whom they describe as their "Imaams", when in actual fact, they (the so-called Imaams of the Shiahs) were august personalities of the Ahl-e- Sunnah wal Jam'at.

The salient features of batil stated in the aforementioned fabrication are:

1. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), the second Khalifah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was a kafir.

2. Not only was Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) a kafir, but a munafiq.

3. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was the leader of the Munafiqeen (hypocrites).

4. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Ahle Bait had cursed Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu).

5. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had prayed for the murder of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu).

6. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) had altered and interpolated the Qur'an Shareef.

7. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was a cruel oppressor, unjust and a usurper.

8. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) prevented others from Imaan and Islam.

9. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) conspired to murder Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu).

10. The day on which Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), was murdered by the Persian kafir, Lu'lu', is the most auspicious day of the year.

11. The Rahmat of Allah is on the Kafir murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu).

12. The day when Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was killed is such an occasion of rejoicing that Allah Ta'ala declared the permissibility of sinning for three consecutive days. That is, each year for three days from the date of Umar's murder, Shiahs are permitted to fornicate, consume alcohol, steal and commit all sins and crimes with complete equanimity since sins are not recorded in these three days.

These are the abominable teachings of Shi'ism regarding the illustrious Ameerul Mu'mineen. Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattab (Radiallahu Anhu) about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

"If there had to be a Nabi after me, it would have been Umar.

"The sternest in the Law of Allah is Umar. "

Nahjul Balaaghah, the highest theological book of the Shiahs have this to say about Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma).

"Boldly and unscrupulously he (i.e. Hadhrat Abu Bakr) and his successor (i.e. Hadhrat Umar), each in turn, pillaged and plundered the wealth of the community leaving the state in such sadly injured condition that the passage of time was increasing the intensity of the injury,.. But, it was carried on under the guise of law and order and many unacceptable excuses were offered to justify these irreligious and ungodly arrogation's and many more will be repeated in the future. "

The Shi'i priest Muhammad Baqir Sadr writes about the Sahabah in general and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) in particular:

"... we find that it is necessary to accept the existence of a large trend, from the very lifetime of the Prophet, who inclined towards proposing the use of Ijtihad and circumstantial considerations in determining their interests, above strict adherence to the religious texts. "

"This trend was represented by a daring group of important Companions like, Umar bin-al-Khattab, who disputed with the Messenger and made judgements contradicting the text in many subjects, believing that he had the right to do so."

The type of 'Ijtihad' which the Shiahs attribute to Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), in particular, and to other Sahaabah, in general, is described in the following statement of Baqir Sadr:

"...we mean by 'ijtihad' the making of judgements in contradiction to the text or acceptance of such a judgement."

A king who pillages and plunders the wealth of a nation is supposed to lead a life of luxury-living in palatial mansions and palaces; relaxing in gardens and orchards; adorning himself in garments of silk, velvet and brocade; indulging in sumptuous feasts and extravagance. But history bears loud testimony to the austere, simple, in fact, life of extreme poverty led by our Ameerul Mu'mineen, Sayyidina Umar Farooq (Radiallahu Anhu). A dozen patches adorned his kurtah of coarse cloth. The frugality and austerity of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) have already attained proverbial significance. The most ardent Sunni sympathizer of Khomeini will not fail in acknowledging this glaring historical fact. Yet the Shi'i priests accuse a Saint of such high, faultless and sterling attributes of having pillaged and plundered the wealth of the Ummah!

HaqquI Yaqeen is another very highly placed book of Shi'i theology. The author of Haqqul Yaqeen is the same Mullah Baqir Majlisi, author of Zadul Ma'ad from which the lengthy fabricated narration (mentioned earlier) has been cited. In his book HaqquI Yaqeen, Baqi Majlisi cites a very lengthy narration in which Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are subjected to extreme vilification. Some excerpts from this fabricated narration of vilification are reproduced here.

"After Makkah Muazzamah, Imam Mehdi will proceed to Madinah, the city of our grandfather, Rasulullah. At Madinah, he (Imam Mehdi) will demonstrate an astonishing act which will be a cause of great happiness for the Mu'mineen and a cause of disgrace for the kuffar and munafiqeen ... When Imam Mehdi will reach the grave of Rasulullah, he will ask the people: "0 people! Is this the grave of our grandfather, Rasulullah?" The people will say - "Yes, this is his grave." Imam Mehdi will then ask:"

"Who are these persons who have been buried alongside our grandfather!"

The people will say: "They are Abu Bakr and Umar, the closest companions of Rasulullah I" Imam Mehdi (inspite of knowing everything) will say:

"Who was Abu Bakr? And, who was Umar? What was their excellence which necessitated their burial alongside our grandfather?"...

"After three days, Sahibul Amr (the Shi'i title for Imam Mehdi) will order the walls to be broken and their bodies exhumed .. After the exhumation of their bodies, he will order their kafan to be removed and their bodies will be hung up on a dried out tree... "

Imam Mehdi will command a dark storm to destroy those who loved them (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). Imam Mehdi will then order that the bodies be taken down from the tree. With the power of Allah, Imam Mehdi will restore them to life. He will order all mankind to gather. Then these two will be held liable for the sin of all oppression and kufr which occurred from the beginning of the world. They will be held responsible for all such sin .....

The sin of every murder committed, of every act of adultery committed, of every act of riba, of every act of haram wealth and injustice perpetrated until the advent of Imam Mehdi's appearance, will be charged against them (Abu Bakr and, Umar). Both of them will plead guilty to all these crimes ... Sahibul Amr will then command that they be hanged on a tree. He will command a fire to rise from the earth and devour them. A fire will (miraculously) rise and reduce them (Abu Bakr and Umar) and the tree to ashes.. "

"Muhammad Rasulullah, Ameerul Mumineen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali), Fatimah Zahra, Hasan Mujtaba, Husain Shaheed, and all the sinless Imaams will come to life. All Mumins and all kafirs will also come to life. "

"... The two (Abu Bakr and Umar) will then be punished so much, that daily, in one day and one night, they will be killed and restored to life a thousand times. After this, Allah will take them away to wherever He desires and continue punishing them as long as He desires. "

This, then are Khomeini's beliefs and attitude in regard to the two highest Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This is the official teaching of the Shiah religion. In his book Kashful Asrar on page 121, Khomeini advises his Shiah brethren to study the books of Mullah Baqir Majlisi who has presented these repugnant fabrications regarding the Sahaabah-e-Kiram (Radiallahu Anhum).

CONTEMPT FOR SAHAABAH :

The Shiahs in the introduction of Nahjul Balaaghah revile the eminent Sahaabi, Hadhrat Abu Musaa Ash'ari (Radiallahu Anhu) in the following way:

"A week and old man, named Abu Moosa Ashari, who was also secretly hostile to Hadhrat Ali be nominated as the arbitrator from this side (i.e. the side of Hadhrat Ali)."

"...these arbitrators (i.e. Abu Musaa Ashari and Amr Ibn Aas) sold the cause of Islam along with their souls to the Devil.

"Abu Moosa-e-Asharee, was a man with weak faith more inclined to look after his worldly interest than the cause Of religion."

But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam spoke in glowing terms of even the members of Abu Musaa Asha'ari's tribe, leave alone the great Sahaabi known as Abu Musaa Ash'ari. Said Nabi-e-Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam):

"They (i.e. the tribe members of Abu Musaa Asha'ari) are of me and I am of them."

[alijan1001]

May Allah save us from arrogance and deceitfulness(taqiyyah).

Proof me wrong that al rafidhas love the companions,dont make takfeer on them(saying that they left islam,became apostates),dont make takfeer on Aisha r.a(saying she is nasibi,in shiasm nasibis are worst creatures) as you claimed.
Produce your evidence if you are truthfull,ya ibn saba!

[Are there] rafidah narrators in the ahlal sunna texts ?



With regard to the title of this thread let it be said right away that there are no Rafidis in the Hadith compilations of the Sunni Masters.

i am tempted to this post this as a follow up to a comment about the views of certain ahlal sunna authorities on the Shi'i.

I wish you had resisted the temptation. Discussing hadith transmission is not a Shi`a forte and fosters many misconceptions which then have to be cleaned up.

The reader will notice the term Rafidi every now and then in the following biographies. The Sunni scholars generally define a Rafidi as a Shi'ah who openly criticizes or rejects the legitimacy of the Caliphs before 'Ali (a).

I.e. one who disparages and violates the Consensus of the Companions. I find it useful at this point - unfortunately - to remind the readers of the pains taken by the pious Sunni Salaf in defining the status of the Rafidis Shi`a with a clear conscience. For truly, as `Umar said, you cannot swindle a Believer.

1. Rafidi = "He who insults Abu Bakr and `Umar" (Imam Ahmad)

2. Rafidi = "Whoever disrespects the Two Shaykhs [Abu Bakr and `Umar] while accepting the validity of their imamate." (al-Dhahabi)

3. Extreme Rafidis = "those who not only insult the two Shaykhs - Abu Bakr and `Umar, Allah be well-pleased with them - but also reject the validity of their imamate." (al-Dhahabi)

4. Al-Tabari considers Rafidis kafir and al-Shafi`i forbade praying behind them.

5. According to some Hanafis, to insult the two Shaykhs (Abu Bakr and `Umar) constitutes disbelief (kufr). BUT the claim that Abu Hanifa declared Shi`is Kafir is a lie.

6. Cursing the Companions deserves corporeal punishment according to the vast majority, while according to some of the Malikis and Hanafis the offender is (to be) executed.

7. To insult the Companions is a "major grave indecency" (al-Nawawi)

8. Rafidis have nothing to do with the moderate Shi`is of the pious Salaf.

9. To prefer `Ali to `Uthman is neither Rafd (rejectionism) nor a bid`a (heretical innovation), for several of the Companions and Successors did.

...

'Abbad b. Ya'qub al-Rawajini (died 250 AH)

Sahih Bukhari [kitab al-tawhid] Sahih al-Tirmidhi [kitab al-manaqib] Sunan Ibn Majah [kitab ma ja' fi al-jana'iz]

He was a trustworthy Rafidi and his hadith is in (Sahih of) al-Bukhari. [Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Taqrib al-Tahdhib, under "'Abbad b. Ya'qub al-Rawajani"]

The term Ibn Hajar used is saduq. I would translate saduq not as "trustworthy," which I reserve for thiqa - a higher grade than saduq -, but "truthful" or "reliable" as you yourself quote below.

Abu Hatim said: He was a shaykh, reliable. Ibn 'Adi said: He used to denounce the Salaf. In him was extremism of Shi'ism. Salih b. Muhammad said: He used to denounce 'Uthman. I heard him saying, "Allah is more just than that he would admit Talhah and al-Zubayr into heaven after they paid allegiance to 'Ali and then fought him." Ibn Hibban said: He was a Rafidi inviting (others to his belief). He narrated this hadith Ö, "If you see Mu'awiyah on my pulpit, kill him!" [Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, under "'Abbad b. Ya'qub al-Rawajani"]

You should have also quoted from IH that this `Abbad used to say in public "`Ali dug out the seas of the world and al-Husayn caused them to flow"! Ibn Hajar also narrates from al-Khatib that Ibn Khuzayma stopped narrating from `Abbad. And you may know that Ibn Khuzayma, like Sufyan al-Thawri, prefers `Ali to `Uthman (see e.g. Lisan al-Mizan 1:78), so the reason he stopped was not the acceptable, moderate Shi`ism of preferring `Ali to `Uthman but the unacceptable Rafidism of attacking Abu Bakr and `Umar.

Concerning the quotes of Ali Zahra and other Shi`i contributors on the question of `Abbad ibn Ya`qub from Tahdhib al-Tahdhib (5:95), of the words:

(1) "Narrated from him, al-Bukhari, al-Tirmidhi..."; (2) "Ibn 'Adi: He used to denounce the Salaf. " (3) Ibn Hibban: He was a Rafidi inviting (others to his belief). These translations - I am sorry to say - bear the now-familiar stamp of Shi`i light-handedness. For the original actually states:

(1) "Narrated from him: al-Bukhari - a single hadith, and coupled with another chain, - al-Tirmidhi..." etc. The answer to the Shi`is is in these additions that they usualy avoid to mention. Furthermore, what al-Bukhari took is a hadith that has nothing to do with his politics or his Rafidism, just as the rest of his narrations in the other Sunni compilations.

(2) "Ibn `Adi: He used to insult (yashtum) the Salaf." I suppose "denounce" sounds noble whereas "insult" is ignominious, but "yashtum" can hardly be translated other than as "insult" or "curse." And the Salaf here include Abu Bakr and `Umar, so this fits the above definitions of Rafidis.

(3) Ibn Hibban: "He was a Rafidi inviting others to his belief and, on top of that, narrating denounced reports from well-established authorities and so he deserves to be abandoned [as a narrator]."

'Abd al-Malik b. A'yan al-Kufi

Sahih al-Bukhari [kitab al-tawhid] Sahih Muslim [kitab al-'iman] Sahih al-Tirmidhi [kitab tafsir al-Qur'an] Sunan al-Nasa'i [kitab al-'iman wa al-nudhur] Sunan Abu Dawud [kitab al-buyu'] Sunan Ibn Majah [kitab al-zakah]

All together, the above narrate a total of THREE hadiths through him through six chains and, in Bukhari and Muslim's cases, only as *corroborative chains* not as stand-alone! Finally, none of these hadiths bear on doctrine.

He was Rafidi Shi'i, one of (the people of) opinion. [Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli, Du'afa al-'Uqayli, under "'Abd al-Malik b. A'yan"]

He was Rafidi, reliable (saduq). [Al-Mizzi, Tahdhib al-Kamal, under "'Abd al-Malik b. A'yan"]

Al-'Ijli said: He was from Kufah, a Tabi'i (Successor), reliable. Sufyan said: 'Abd al-Malik b. 'A'yan the Shi'i narrated to us, he was a Rafidi to us, a man of opinion. Hamid said: Those three brothers, 'Abd al-Malik, Zurarah, and Hamran were Rawafid all of them. Abu Hatim said: He was one of the earliest to embrace Shi'ism, (he was) on the position of truthfulness, having good traditions, and his traditions are written. [Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, under "'Abd al-Malik b. A'yan"]

It is funny that in the first instance you quote Ibn Hajar's Taqrib but not in the second. This is because the Taqrib is Ibn Hajar's final word and, in this case, it does not suit you. The final word on `Abd al-Malik ibn A`yan is that he is "saduq shi`i" (Taqrib 1:362 #4164), a truthful shi`i, - most likely weak ("da`if", cf. Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib 2:379 #4164)- but *not* a Rafidi.

So the most accurate opinion of those cited by Ibn Hajar in the Tahdhib then retained by him in the Taqrib is that of Abu Hatim al-Razi, except that it is typically mistranslated in a way that cajoles Shi`i illusions. The correct translation is not "He was one of the earliest to embrace Shi'ism, (he was) on the position of truthfulness, having good traditions, and his traditions are written" but "He was one of the early Shi`is [=moderate], he can be considered reliable [as a narrator] (mahalluhu al-sidq = less than saduq), he is passable in his traditions (salih al-hadith), and his hadiths are written."

The expression "his hadiths are written" in the terminology of hadith scholars means: they should not be discarded but retained as corroborations of other chains, not as independent reports.

'Abd al-Razzaq al-San'ani (died 211 AH)

This Shaykh from whom al-Bukhari narrated is also an example of a moderate Shi`i, NOT a Rafidi. BTW it is related that when AR wanted to leave San`a the people were depressed at losing this great `Alim from their city. One of them advised in their Shura: "Put chains on him." So they married him off to a beautiful lady.

confident that this will invite comments,

You should have included Imam al-Nasa'i and Imam al-Hakim, they were both also accused of (moderate) Shi`ism. Imam al-Nasa'i actually died - Allah have mercy on him - from a savage beating at the hands of some Nasibis (haters of `Ali).

The rule of the hadith masters was to accept the narration of innovators - even Rafidis if they are not considered disbelievers - on one condition: _that their narration has nothing to do with promoting their innovation_.

There may be other reasons for acceptance. For example: the Kharijis' narrations were accepted because according to Kharijis themselves, lying entails kufr. The hadith scholars took this into consideration to conclude that it was highly improbable or nearly impossible that a Khariji narrator lie. If he also happened to have accuracy (dabt), That made them trustworthy (thiqa) as a narrator of this or that particular narration.

There are, as a rule, *no Rafidis* among the narrators of Sunni hadith compilations, except within the narrow parameters seen in the case of al-Rawajini whom you cited. As for your example of 'Abd al-Malik b. A'yan al-Kufi, it supports the opposite of what you claim. You live and you learn.

Back in September of last year I gave up on a discussion thread entitled "Re: 100 Shi'ite Narrators of Hadeeth Relied Upon By The Sunnites" with someone who was also keen on "inviting comments," by the name of shams_tabriz@hotmail.com. Evidently you and he used the same website to toss up this salad - alas - for the purposes of confusion and misrepresentation.

[alijan1001]

Lets assume you are telling the truth. But to suggest as you did that it is baseless that Shia hate the sahabah is grossly ignorant or deliberately deceptive. I don't know which one you are.

My beef is not against the partisans of Ali, the proto Shia if you like but my problem is with the shiasm which has developed as mainstream in Iran and Iraq which certainly hates the majority of the Sahabah and has done so for hundreds of years and besides hating and making takfeer on the Sahabah has innovated much shirk, kufr and innovation.

Go educate yourself.

Shia Beliefs :With Citations?
001. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 - Published Iran]
002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 - Published Iran]
003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 - Published Iran]
004. The fourteen innocents (Ma'sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 - Published Lahore]
005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na'uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A'yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
006. To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
007. Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
008. ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]
009. Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]
010. Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]
011. Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 - Published Iran]
012. Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 - Published Iran]
013. Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 - Published Iran]
014. Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]
015. “ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]
016. Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]
017. After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]
018. To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]
019. The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however* ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]
020. Shiites scholars believe that Ali (r.a) and all his innocent patriarchs are superior to all Prophets (a.s) except Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#70 - Published Iran]
021. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come out of his cave he will be naked like a newborn and the first person who shall take the oath of allegiance on his hands will be the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
022. The greatest slander upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) of sexual intercourse… (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#119 – Published Iran]
023. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]
024. On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]
025. Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
026. After ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) only Holy Descendants (r.a) reached the height of saintliness, rest all other Prophets (a.s) and Angels (a.s) lie below their ranks (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#29 – Published Lahore]
027. Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]
028. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
029. Adam (a.s)’s prayers were accepted on the mediation of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ali (r.a), Fatima (r.a), Hasan (r.a) and Hussain (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
030. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]
031. Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 - Published Iran]
032. Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 - Published Iran]
033. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]
034. The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]
035. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
036. What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
037. What the lady “Zulekhah”, Ayesha (r.a) had got that Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) despite having coeval wives or other young ladies, married with a nine years old little mother at His age of fifty (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
038. Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]
039. One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 - Published Iran]
040. To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 - Published Iran]
041. Penis proclaimed the Imamate (patriarchate) of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Aasar-e-Haidery, Pg#557 – Published Lahore]
042. When the last era will come, Ali (r.a) will appear (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#603 - Published Lahore]
043. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a cattle who will arise from earth before the Doomsday) (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#602 - Published Lahore]
044. Ayesha (r.a) was an American Lady or any European Madam? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
045. Hafsa (r.a), a bad natured woman, was accepted by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)… She was a pig-faced woman (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#124 – Published Lahore]
046. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a four-legged animal) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#336 - Published Iran]
047. When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
048. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]
049. Ayesha (r.a) and Shiites Imam performed Muta’h (a form of temporary marriage regarded as illegitimate in Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Jawaz-e-Muta’h, Pg#78 – Published Bhakkar]
050. Jealousy, hatred and resentment were the attributes of Ayesha (r.a)’s nature (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#40]

051. Ayesha (r.a) use to misbehave, oppose, talk louder, babble and slander on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#70]
052. The youth of this misfortune {Ayesha (r.a)} would have spoil the old age of Mua’zzamah (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#88]
053. Ayesha (r.a) used to babble and fight with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#53]
054. On not arriving of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ayesha (r.a) suffered with the fits of madness and passion (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#54]
055. After the death when Angels of grave start questioning then Maula’s {Ali (r.a)} chair is being brought and sins are pardoned only after recognizing him (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
056. Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) & Umar (r.a)}, Hafsa (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#28, Pg#894 – Published India]
057. Ayesha (r.a) for the first time initiated the war customs (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#275 – Published Karachi]
058. Ayesha (r.a) was a malicious and short-tempered woman (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#289 – Published Karachi]
059. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) had become apostate by narrating forged Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#475 – Published Karachi]
060. Ayesha (r.a) used to say that kill the Na’sal {Usman (r.a)} because he has become a Infidel (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#Preface – Published Karachi]
061. Ayesha (r.a)’s heart was blacked-out (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#30 – Published Karachi]
062. Ayesha (r.a) had such an opposition with Usman (r.a) that she ordered for his murder (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#31 – Published Karachi]
063. Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) played a cunning game like fox upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#69 – Published Lahore]
064. O Sunnis! Is Ayesha (r.a) a woman or a female monkey? (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#67 – Published Lahore]
065. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will resurrect Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a)} and punish them by hanging on the tree (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#361 - Published Iran]
066. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear, before other nonbelievers, he will kill Ahl-e-Sunnah and Ahl-e-Sunnah scholars (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#527 - Published Iran]
067. Imams used to say Salam to each other while taking bath (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#118 - Published Iran]
068. Imams are not born through the womb of their mothers but they are born from the sides of their mothers (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#474 – Published Lahore]
069. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) recited Holy Quran and called Salam in the womb of his mother (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#475 – Published Lahore]
070. Imams are also innocent like the Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#28 – Published Lahore]
071. Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba was the first who declared the faith in Imamat and that Ali (r.a) is the true God (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#234 - Published Iran]
072. We (Imams) among ALLAH’s creatures are His eyes and among His servants (human being) the people of command (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#260 - Published Iran]
073. In the early Islamic period due to Taqiyyah (subterfuge), Shiites scholars used to hide the Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#92 - Published Iran]
074. To weep on the vulnerability of Imams and to hide the secrets is like Holy crusade (Jihad) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#283 - Published Iran]
075. World cannot exist without Imam (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#233 - Published Iran]
076. Imams know all what happened earlier and what is about to happen and nothing remains hidden to them (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#10 - Published Iran]
077. Without knowing the Imam, God cannot be proved (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#331 - Published Iran]
078. Imam knows the time of his death and dies by his own will (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#23 - Published Iran]
079. Imam has greater qualities than the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#299-300 - Published Iran]
080. Imams are equal in the status with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#287 - Published Iran]
081. Imam get revelations (WAHI by ALLAH) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#329-330 - Published Iran]
082. In the state of Taqiyyah (subterfuge) whatever Imam says just obey him and act accordingly (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#72 - Published Iran]
083. The Angels reveal upon Imams in the Shab-e-Qadr (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#569 - Published Lahore]
084. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear there will be only forty perfect believers (Mo’min) in the world (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#571 - Published Lahore]
085. All Angels, Jibrail (a.s) {Gabriel (a.s)} and Mikail (a.s) will take the oath of allegiance upon Imam Mehdi’s (SHIAs 12th Imam) hand (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#594 - Published Lahore]
086. After Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s death all his disciples except four became apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81 - Published Iran]
087. Umar (r.a) told to Satan that he had invaded the Caliphate of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#82 - Published Iran]
088. Ali (r.a) imprecated Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) to ruin in life and thereafter (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#189 - Published Iran]
089. The first three Caliphs (r.a) and other Sahabah (r.a) became apostate due to the denial of Ali (r.a)’s prophecy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#184 - Published Iran]
090. Mua’wiyah (r.a) can be associated with whole vice (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#35 – Published Karachi]
091. Sahabah (r.a) brought disgrace upon Islam in Uhad War (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
092. Ja’far Sadiq (r.t.a) never stood up from the prayer mat unless he had not sent curse upon Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a), Hafsa (r.a), Hind (r.a) and Umm-ul-Hakm (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#599 – Published Iran]
093. After the death of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), except three all the Sahabah (r.a) have become apostate (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#3 – Published Iran]
094. The first after Satan who had accepted his religion is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#18 – Published Lahore]
095. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was of the same belief which was founded by Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#22 – Published Lahore]
096. We have only La’nat (curse) and Tabbarah (imprecation) for Abu-Hurairah (r.a) like narrators (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
097. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was a disgraced character (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#65 – Published Lahore]
098. Mua’wiyah (r.a) and Abu-Hurairah (r.a) were infidels and apostates (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#79 – Published Lahore]
099. Sahabah (r.a)’s testimonial cannot save them from imprecation (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#32 – Published Lahore]
100. Sahabah (r.a) were not blessed according to the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#68 – Published Karachi]
101. Some Sahabah (r.a) performed evil deeds; they did the acts of stealing, rape and telling a lie (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#64 – Published Karachi]
102. Ayesha (r.a) use to compare Usman (r.a) with a Jew named Na’sal and say that he should be killed (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#584 - Published Lahore]
103. The caliphate of first three caliphs is like the penis of donkey (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#72 – Published Lahore]
104. Sahabah (r.a) made innovations in the religion after Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), cut Islam into pieces and minced the Shari’ah (Islamic Jurisprudence) (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
105. Sodomy was very common among various Sahabah (r.a); for e.g. Waleed bin Mugha’irah, Umar (r.a)… (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
106. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a) will enter into hell through a special door (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#500 - Published Iran]
107. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a) and Mua’wiyah will be persecuted severely than other hellish people (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#503 - Published Iran]
108. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) are the worst creatures (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#519 - Published Iran]
109. Abbas (r.a) and Aqeel (r.a) were weak believers and men of mean spirit (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#618 – Published Iran]
110. There is no difference in the faith of Abu-Bakar and in the faith of Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#93 – Published Lahore]
111. Abu-Hurairah (r.a) was the greatest liar who associated false Hadiths to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#442 – Published Lahore]
112. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was apostate, the greatest non believer and a corrupt man (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
113. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was a puppet in the hands of Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
114. Mua’wiyah (r.a) is being burnt inside a coffin beneath the interior most part of the hell and if Pharaoh (Firo’un) would have not said “INNA RABBI-KUM-UL-A’LA” there would be no one below Mua’wiyah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#316 – Published Lahore]
115. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s mother and granny were prostitutes (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#301 – Published Lahore]
116. Usman (r.a) protested against Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and disobeyed him (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#30, Pg#934 – Published India]
117. Quran does not show the superiority of Abu-Bakr (r.a) but the infidelity of Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Manazarah Hussainiyah, Pg#47 – Published Lahore]
118. Zubair bin Al-Awam (r.a) is the breed of Muta’h (temporary marriage illegitimate according to Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#24 – Published Karachi]
119. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cunning person (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#339 – Published Karachi]
120. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) made naked himself… (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
121. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a liar and a miser (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#147 – Published Karachi]
122. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a)’s mother was a big liar. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#146 – Published Karachi]
123. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cheater. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#245 – Published Karachi]
124. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri and Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) were hypocrites and traitors (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#474 – Published Karachi]
125. The history of the first three Caliphs was full of ignorance, stupidity, brutality, bribery and sinfulness (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#252 – Published Karachi]
126. How unfortunate are these Talha (r.a), Zubair (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a)! (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
127. Mua’wiyah used to feign and wile (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#421 – Published Karachi]
128. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) himself passed the orders of Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s murder (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
129. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s all army men were foul-natured, bastards, wile and non-believers (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#473 – Published Karachi]
130. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) himself and his father were hypocrites and imps (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#775 – Published Karachi]
131. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) was very unfortunate in faith and Islam and he left this world in the same state (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#258 – Published Karachi]
132. Rural-ship of a villager is better than the piety of Sahabah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#432 – Published Karachi]
133. Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) were seditious, vicious and dissentious persons who could commit any crime for wealth and power (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#443 – Published Karachi]
134. Among a few extremely remorseful and shameful characters of the world, one is of Zubair (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#48 – Published Karachi]
135. Usman (r.a) reaped whatever he sew (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
136. Usman (r.a)’s mother was a prostitute (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#18 – Published Karachi]
137. I dare say that today’s Iranic Nation is far better than the people of Hijaz (Sahabah) in Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s era (Na’uzubillah). [Sahifah-e-Inqalab {Khomeini’s last will and testament}, Pg#46]
138. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was habitual of using foul-mouth and giving abuses (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
139. Abu-Bakr (r.a) used to abuse very often (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
140. Abu-Bakr (r.a) had no religious status (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#8 – Published Karachi]
141. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was like Halaku and Changez (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#10 – Published Karachi]
142. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was only curious about the money in his Caliphate (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#142 – Published Karachi]
143. Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) were culpable and unforgiving (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#159 – Published Karachi]
144. Mua’wiyah (r.a) killed Ayesha (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#32 – Published Karachi]
145. Umar (r.a) not even liked Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and His daughter (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#94 – Published Karachi]
146. Starting from the day first, Umar (r.a) is responsible for the hostilities and blood-shedding among the Muslims (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
147. Umar (r.a) passed humiliating sentences upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s sayings (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#67 – Published Karachi]
148. Abbas (r.a)’s false allegations upon Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Wohi Mujrim Wohi Munsif, Pg#75]
149. Umar (r.a) was sent to Hell on 9th Rab’i-ul-Awwal (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#404 – Published Iran]
150. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Umar (r.a); Mua’wiyah (r.a) was sent to Hell on 22nd Rajab so this day must be celebrated (with Koondas) (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#34 – Published Iran]
151. Last diet of Umar (r.a)’s was Vine (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#241 – Published Lahore]
152. Umar (r.a) belonged to such family in which mothers and sisters are made as wives (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
153. Umar (r.a) is the lock of Hell, it was better if he would be the gate (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#430 – Published Lahore]
154. Umar (r.a) and Waleed Bin Mugha’irah (r.a) were she-gay (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#246 – Published Lahore]
155. Nikkah is valid without the witnesses. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#387 – Published Iran]
156. Quran can be recited in toilet (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#502 – Published Iran]
157. By hiding the private parts with only hand, Sattr can be achieved. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#501 – Published Iran]
158. What so ever the Ahl-e-Sunnah scholar tells about some query, to do its opposite is SHIA religion. [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#55 - Published Iran]
159. According to SHIA scholars, Ahl-e-Sunnah are worse and dirtiest infidels than the Jews or Christians or Majoos (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#306 - Published Iran]
160. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the true religion. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#332 - Published Iran]
161. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the part of belief. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#328 - Published Iran]
162. By not reciting “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH”, Ahl-e-Sunnah are not Mo’min (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#13 – Published Lahore]
163. ALLAH produces 70 Angels from the couple who perform Muta’h which keep on praying for them (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
164. Ahl-e-Sunnah (Nasibi) are worse than dog in front of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#516 - Published Iran]
165. Black dress is the dress of people of Hell (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#8 - Published Iran]
166. Leavings of Ahl-e-Sunnah’s are as Haram then any other Non-Muslim. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#8* - Published Iran]
167. Niece and Aunts can remain in Nikkah at a time. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#260* - Published Iran]
168. Donkey’s flesh is Halal. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#213* - Published Iran]
169. Black dress is the dress of Firo’un. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#163* - Published Iran]
170. No witness is required in the Nikkah as GOD Himself is. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#251* - Published Iran]
171. Present Azaan is correct, curse be upon Mafoodha who innovated “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH” in Azaan. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#188* - Published Iran]
172. There is no right for Ahl-e-Sunnah in Islam so Nikkah with them is also Haram. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#3 ,Pg#258* - Published Iran]
173. Istinja (washing of private parts) with Saliva is legitimate. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#41* - Published Iran]
174. Announcement of SHIA Kalimah; reciting “LA-ILAHA-ILL-ALLAHU-MUHAMMAD-UR-RASOOL-... is not the sign of Iman. [Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Pg#3 – Published Lahore]
175. Neither Fasting is spoiled nor Bath (Ghusl) is subjected by doing un-natural things with a women. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#460 – Published Iran]
176. Own female servant can be given to someone temporarily for Muta’h practices. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#244 – Published Iran]
177. Muta’h can also be done with Non-Muslims. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#256 – Published Iran]
178. A man can even take benefit (by doing Muta’h) from a woman for about an hour or so. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#266 – Published Iran]
179. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) has no accountability; it can be done with 1000 even. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#258-259 – Published Iran]
180. Imams use to order openly for Muta’h. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#253 – Published Iran]
181. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#302 – Published Iran]
182. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate and their slaughtered animals are also Haram. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#303 – Published Iran]
183. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) is legitimate even for the sake of a piece of wood. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#267 – Published Iran]
184. MEHRAM male and female can see each other’s body. [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#292 – Published Lahore]

[a bro]

look Ahmedjbh there are to ways 2 explain your statement
I dont hate any sahaba, and i am shia, and i havent read any shia book that tells me to hate any sahaba.


1. you lack basic knowlegde of the rawafidh, that would make u a jahil in your own deen
2. you are doing taqiyya

Maybe you can fool some jahil hizbut Tahriris or sufis. But me as an ex Rafidi cant stop laughing when i read trash like this. Every Jahil little rafidhi kid knows the usool of his deen is tawallee and tabarree for the Ahlul bayt and their friends. And also every retarded fasiq, opium smoking , zinaa doing, tatbir making rafidi knows that whoever rejects wilaya of Ali is kafir by consensus of the 12ers.

may Allah guide you to islaam