PDA

View Full Version : Habashis


Abdullah al-Shishani
18th August 2004, 11:52 AM
Assalamu aleykum


The Zionists aren't asleep. They have created this new group and are actively propagating their misguidance, especially aiming at Chechnya. These Habashis, have took control of the official Muftiat in Ukraine, and established their base there. Since the Mufti is their guy, they have opened Madrasa and are actively teaching the false beliefs, and recruiting new people, taking advantage of the anti-Wahhabi hysteria, in the former Soviet-Union. Their beliefs comprise of Djahmiya, Mu'tazila, grave worshiper, Sufi and other ideas (I guess the Zionists want to unite all of those who have been exposed by the Truth). They are especially active with Chechens (I guess the Zionists are scared of correct Akida, which is returning to Chechens) and they have support of local murtad Sufi mushriks, based on common hate of "Wahhabis", and of course Habashis give a green light to Sufi 'saint' worshiping.

I just wanted to warn muslims about this group, they start aguing about Arsh, providing Ayats and ahadeeth, and anyone who has little knowledge can fall into their traps.

Wassalamu aleykum

ibn abbas
14th September 2004, 03:43 PM
who are the habashis? who do they follow? what is his name?
what is their belief?

abu imaan an-nepalee
24th September 2004, 11:45 AM
look at da rass sly styles of dis habashi* bumbakiss boy!

You ask what the habashie are and your the habashie? your like the rawafid ya bumbakiss boy! sly fox jew style!

asharee_salafi
11th October 2004, 07:03 PM
in response to ibn abbas

the habashees are names after abdullah al habash,

they are agroup who pretend to follow the asharee aqeedah but in truth are the jahmiyyah

the are found in philadelphia,australia,lebanon,

hope that answers your question,

ali
12th October 2004, 10:05 PM
THE HABASHI HERESY
Known as The Association of Islamic Charitable Projects (A.I.C.P)

• It’s permissible with the Habashi doctrine to seek refuge in other than Allah, saying “A’UDHU BIRASOOLILLAH” I seek refuge in the prophet!!() This should be enough to prove the deviant “Fatwas of this person”.
• It’s also permissible to call upon the dead saints for ones need, “for they are able to listen to his call whether from far: east or west, and even exit their graves and respond to the distressed one when he calls them, they relieve his suffering, give him his need, and then they return to their graves” (). This Fatwa contradicts the Qur’an ( Don’t call any with Allah) And the hadith “If you ever ask, ask Allah, and if you ever seek help, seek it from Allah” “The call (Du’aa) is worship”. which means that calling other than Allah is considered a worship to other than Allah. Sheikh Al-zabeedi says “It is shameful with those of faith to seek for their need other than Allah while they hear Allah saying ( Isn’t Allah enough for His servant) [It-haafussadah Almuttaqeen 9:498]. They even oppose the verse they recite twenty times a day or more in their prayer ( It is You whom we worship, from You we seek help) when they direct the same term to the dead saints or prophets saying to them “ from you we seek help”.
• In his book (Fat’hul Rahman) the Habashi states that “Sheikh Abdul Qader Jilani can extinguish hell fire (Jahanam) by blowing on it if he desires. (Recorded on video.) Just recently when people questioned him he suggested it to be erased from his book!
• He was asked about one who prostrates to a statue that is not being worshipped before: is it Shirk? He replied “No, he is a sinner but not Mushrik() . It is astonishing to consider it Shirk, only when the idol becomes second hand!
• It is permissible with Habashi to touch the wall and stones of prophet’s or saint’s grave [Awliyaa] to seek blessings, claiming that “the grave of Sheikh (Maaroof Al-karkhi) is a well tester and experimented medicine for one who visit it for his need or calamity." This Fatwa conflicts the verdict of Abu Hamed Algazali who warned those who visit Medina from touching the wall or stone of the prophet’s grave saying “Because this is the habit of the Christians Al-nawawi cited the scholar’s disapproval of this evil action that is done usually by ignorants, Assubki agreed to what Alnawawi said ().
• He says: It is likely that Allah throw His prophets, pious onse in hell, and reward the non-Mulims disbelievers in Paradise. (Manarulhuda 23:28).
It is permissible with the Habashi that a Muslim prays while mixed with feces's dung and piss of dogs “his prayer is valid, irrespective to what kind of dirtiness sticking on him, light or heavy”.() He also states that if one goes to the bathroom and then delays purifying himself from trace of feces until after taking ablution (Wudu) then his Wudu is valid. For it is only preferable to clean ones self from feces before making Wudu, but not obligatory”. He also denounces those who use water for purification(). However, this filthy Fatwa conflicts with what was authentically reported that “The Prophet was ordered by Jibreel [while praying] to take off his shoes because they were dirty. It also contradicts with the other Habashi Fatwa “If the mother touches urine of her baby while changing his napkin: she committs major sin” this Fatwa forced his female students to wear gloves when changing their children’s napkin lest a drop of urine reaches their skin. He also considers the saliva that comes out of the sleeping one is dirty, and that the meat we buy must be washed [Bugiah 121-122]. We ask the Habashi this: Is the child’s urine dirtier than the piss, and dung of the dog? and is the saliva of the human same in the case of dirtiness as dog?

• He curses some companions of the prophet, describes Mu-aawiyah Ibn Abi Sufian as an idol trader, selling idols to the Indian pagans to incite Idol worshipping() This is an offensive statement against the prophet’s brother in law, the way of Habashi is different from the way of Al-Shafii who refused to speak against those who preceded us in faith. Once again we show how the Habashi covers his deviant way by alleging himself as Ash-Shafii follower while he disagrees with Al-Shafii.
• He says “having sexual intercourse with a hermaphrodite Khunthaa during the day of Ramadan does not break ones fasting, as far as he (or she) has two members, of which we don’t know the original member of either(). At the same page he states that masterbating or intercoursing an animal: both break ones fasting. We are so sad to hear that masterbation has worst result the intercoursing with a half woman Mukhannath.!
• He claims that the paper money which is currently used has no Zakah to be paid upon, because Zakah should be paid for one who possesses gold or silver() By this evil Fatwa he discouraged people from paying Zakah, made the rich people to believe that they are poor despite the millions of Paper money they have, because they have papers not gold or silver.
• He allowed Muslims to take Riba from the Kafirs, saying “Take Riba from the bank as far as the owner is Christian or what ever, put your money in a bank if one of it’s contributors is Kafir, “take interest as far as you are benefited”. This is a Jewish Fatwa which Habashi attempts to re-enter in this Ummah. It is the Jews who say “Do not take Riba from your Israelite brother, from others you can take” [Deuteronomy 15:1 see also 23:19]. Habashi’s Fatwa is based on a void opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa that was denounced by Imam Alshafii who said “This is false, riba should not be allowed after Allah disallowed it” (Al-um 8:538-539). We ask: Is Habashi following Al-Shafii, or he is using his name as a cover or umbrella to be able to deceive the Ummah?
• He even allowed other ways to spoil the Kuffaar, such as gambling with them, playing lottery ()stealing, affirming that “there is no peace treaty between Muslims and Kafirs, and we are allowed to spoil them in any way since we are in a state of war with all types of Non Muslims, and all Kafirs should be considered as warrior Kafirs. (Recorded on audio.) But if this is hisconviction, why then we find this special relationship and support between the Habashis and Christians? their deputy in the parliament (Adnan Tarabulsi) says “We have given Christians thousands of our voices for election and they did the same for us, the other Islamic groups did not vote for Christian candidates as we did” “ “We open our good hand of co-operation to all Lebanese whether Christians or seculars” (Addiyar magazine, see Manarul Huda 23:28 & 40:13) but their hands are not opened to the Muslims.
• Habashi allows playing tricks in religion, calling it (Heelah Shar-iyyah) for instance, he disallowed Al-ckohol, but “Who needed it, let him go to it’s seller, saying: I want to buy this bottle, but not the Al-ckohol consisted, for I’m giving you the money for the bottle not for the Al-ckohol”. He concludes “this is a trick that is used to escape from what is forbidden”() He made a Fatwa to some students who face difficulties in universities with attending Friday prayer at study period to eat onion and garlic “so they become pardoned from attending Friday prayer." These are Jewish Fatwas, the Jews tricked their God when He ordered them not to fish on Saturday, they trapped fishes on Saturday and then collected them on Sunday, then Allah changed them to be apes. We are kindly directing this question to the Habashi: Who are you tricking: the seller, yourself, or Allah? Does the Habashi need to know that Allah watches the intentions? This is the result of those who twist the meaning of Allah’s names and attributes, the Habashi distorts the meanings of Allah’s attributes, likewise claiming that (Istawa: went over the throne) means (controlled or captured it) [See Izharul Aqeedassunniyyah 38] such a disgusting interpretation which means That Allah controlled what was out of his control. He calls it (taaweel) and refers to scholars who repented from it, such as Ash-ari Gazali, Joeiny, and Al-Razi.
• He claims: “The unbeliever is oughtto be so, and without Allah he could have never become unbeliever, because Allah is the helper of the Kaafir to become Kaafir”. He cited (Al-razi’s) statement “Man is obliged and forced, but appears to have a free choice(). This means necessarily Allah should not punish people because they are forced to do evil, and have no free will!
• He stated that one who prays while wearing only underwear covering his private part: his prayer is valid, and non should forbid him from praying almost naked as far as he believes it allowed to pray so, and non has the right to forbid those who show their thighs in public Bathrooms, unless when they show the two private parts, because showing the thighs is not forbidden according to many scholars(). Now, imagine a Muslim praying while full of dirt and almost naked! How would it look like to you or to the non-Muslim? These kinds of Fatwas repel the non-Muslims from Islam.
• He claims that the first sight of the women is not forbidden even if it lasted for a long time. ()This Fatwa disagrees with the Fatwa of Sheikh Izz Bin Abdissalam who said “Looking at woman is forbidden because it is the first step to fornication”.
• He claims that “It is permissible for a Muslim woman to go out even without her husband’s permission to take religious classes() she can go out decorated perfumed. His student (Nizar) added “even wearing also the very tight pants, for we attempt to reconcile between religion and fashion”()It seems that Habashi is supporting people with Fatwas of what they desire
• The Habashi allowed women even to sing and dance (Sarihubayan 161). Using western musical instruments (Drams) for their so called religious songs! So, the words of the songs are Islamic, but the music is western style. This is an abnormal phenomenon that an Islamic movement talking too much about Islam allows its persons to sing Islamic-western musical songs!!!
• That is why their radio station in Lebanon broad casts' women singers, praising in their songs secular politicians, calling Christians “the honorable citizens”. This betrayal confirms the news about their Sheikh’s with the Ethiopian government thirty years ago. The betrayers praise Salahuddeen, claim that they are on his way, but Salahu-deen was a Hero not traitor, he compelled the Baatinis and Shiats, in contrary to what the Habashis do today.
• He claimed that it is allowable for woman to expose some of her body to one who is usually disallowed to see her as long as he is not looking at her with sexual desire (Bugiatuutaalib 288 but omitted in the second edition).
• He allowed the Mahram to see every thing from his female relative (Sister, mother, daughter) except what is between her navel and her knee saying “who ever says that (awrah) is more than that, his saying is week” (Bugiah 290 omitted in the second Edition).
• His followers opposed all Muslims regarding the Qiblah direction in U.S.A and Canada, declaring recently that the earth is flat not rounded, they were disappointed after the failure debate with a Christian Lebanese cabinet member broadcast in 1996 on a Lebanese TV Channel. It was a ridiculous and silly debate that caused Christians to trust their religion and to mock Muslims, charging them with ignorance because they still reject this scientific fact.
• He claims that the Quran is the meaning of Allah’s speech, but not his speech, for Allah speaks without language, and He speaks only in His soul. Al-habashi suggested indirectly that this Quran is expressed by Gerbil by citing this verse ( It is but the word of an honorable messenger) (See Idh-har Al-Aqeeda Assunniyah P. 58-59 & 69).
• He uses always false narrations, asserting that Allah said to His angels (Shutup my angels) and ordered Jebril to offer drinks to the inhabitants in heavens and earth for the occasion of prophet Mohamad’s birthday. Yet they still call their Sheikh Al-Habashi as Muhaddith.(Al-Mawlid ASharif P 11-16).
• He claims that Allah can not oppress if He wants to do so, thus, Allah is powerful over most things not all, otherwise we should say He is powerful over Himself ” (Idh-har Al-Aqeeda Assunniyah P. 40) This shows that He is following philosophy not the Sunnah.
He and his followers slander many scholars such as Ibn taimiah, Al-dhahabi, sayid sabiq, Qutb, they have better treatment and deal with Christians, Baatinis, Shi-aits, than to Muslims. They are criminals. Recently, two of them [one and his sister] killed their brother and cut him into pieces in Lebanon [Tripoli] because he used to slander their Sheikh whom they believe him holy, he can pray in Mecca while being in China and able to fly to any place, he meets with the prophet and Al-khadr, his plegm is perfumed as his follower (Nabeel Shareef claims (MajaalisilHuda audio no.28), while he himself considered the coming water out of the mouth of the sleeping person is impure, [Bugiah N.E 121].
Thus it should be known that this group brings political projects, and these projects are not Islamic. Their project is to innovate, call others apart from Allah, tricking Allah, humiliating the scholars, charging them in blasphemy, and cursing many companions They are swerved from straight path as Sheikh Ibn Baz and other scholars declared, for they were founded to provoke discord and violation, and to cause more scattering, deviation and disturbance in this Ummah.

asharee_salafi
13th October 2004, 03:09 PM
Assalaamulekum,

brother Ali is this a copy and paste job? or is this something which you have personally put together?

ali
13th October 2004, 07:53 PM
copy paste