we need a caliph to fight defensive jihad

[gag order]

we need a caliph to fight defensive jihad, without a caliph there is no jihad.

it has been stated to the contrary that "the absence of a caliph does not postpone the jihad because much is lost in its postponement"
(al mughni 8/253)

[gag order]

i need to have this confirmed:

is it true that al albaani said in a debate with a jihadi that you need a caliph for fard al ayn (defensive) jihad.

the source i was given is at tawiyyatul islamiyyah 1987 series of cassettes

[gag order]

this dodgy aqeeda of needing a caliph first to defend against american invasion is promoted by the saudisalafis - they speak from their desires!