Al-zarqawi
8th December 2004, 10:57 PM
Hello it's me again : i found this book on www.why-war.com or something like that :P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate
Praise be to God, the Lord of the Universe, and prayers and peace be upon the most righteous Messenger.
God is great, abundant thanks be to God, and praise be to God morning and evening.
The Center's custom has been to issue a statement about every operation carried out by the mujahidin. However, the operation of 11 Rabi al-Awwal 1424 AH [corresponding to 12 May 2003] was special in several respects and demanded that we devote this book to it. The operation was just the first bullet, God willing. The mujahidin needed this detailed statement to explain the demands of jihadi activity in the Arabian Peninsula and to remove some of the ambiguities from the religious and military standpoints.
This book "The Operation of 11 Rabi al-Awwal: The East Riyadh Operation and Our War with the United States and Its Agents" is divided into four chapters:
First: The Situation in the Islamic World
Second: What is the Solution?
Third: Why Riyadh?
Fourth: Have You Not Become Acquainted with the Mujahidin Yet?
CHAPTER ONE: The Situation In The Islamic World
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, one superpower has been leading the world: the United States. Students of history know that two powers have dominated the world in all ages, except in few eras mentioned in history and expositions, like the eras of Solomon, Dhu-al-Qarnayn, Al-Namrud, and Alexander. The fact that two powers checked each other in the world was a mercy from God to humanity. The Almighty said, "And did not God check one set of people by means of another, the earth would indeed be full of mischief."
Judging the current world situation in the light of this historic fact leads us to one of two conclusions:
1. The United States was able to deviate from this rule by virtue of its comprehensive economic, social, and military power, as happened to Solomon--peace be upon him--Dhu-al-Qarnayn, and others. The current situation of the United States rules out this possibility.
2. We live in an unstable international situation or more correctly in a transitional period to which the rules applied in normal conditions do not apply. It also does not have the prerequisites to survive for long.
The second conclusion is definitely the situation that exists in the world today. The United States, which has become the uncontested sole superpower, is adapting to the situation. It got rid of the restrictions, which the conflict with the Soviet Union had imposed on it, and adopted a new policy. This policy is summed up in taking a direct approach to secure its interests in the world without regard to the interest of others, because it considers itself the sole power in the world and the world should adapt to what it wants.
The talk about the United Nations as an independent party ruling the world is nonsense. Perhaps the United Nations was a body whose judgment was sought and accepted by the nations that established it, including the United States. However, today, it is a toy in the hands of World Zionism. The United States ignored the United Nations when it shyly opposed its invasion of Iraq. Three Crusader countries officially participated in the war with it, disregarding the UN resolutions.
Something called the New World Order has recently appeared. The United States designed it as a map for the world it is seeking to shape. Writer Louis Atiyatallah wrote his new book about it: A Clarification of the Reality of This Order.
In view of the above, the situation of the Muslims will only be a reflection of what the United States wants. The situation in some Islamic countries, however, might require some gradual progress in the implementation of the plans to ensure safety against negative results.
We can sum up the issue and say: The Muslim countries today are colonized. Colonialism is either direct or veiled.
Veiled Colonialism:
The past century was the century of the direct colonization of the Muslim countries, under which they languished for many years. This was a time when the Islamic World had reached the highest degree of ideological deviation, polytheism, and disregard for jihad. Colonialism could not find any significant resistance in most countries, particularly at the beginning.
Toward the end of the colonialist era, the colonialist countries were no longer able to bear the painful blows they received from the mujahidin in the colonized countries. They clearly realized that the new generations were moving toward resisting colonialism. They found themselves struggling between the strong desire not to give up their colonies and the painful deterrent posed by the jihad, which they saw growing day after day.
At this stage, Zionism intervened and put its touches on a colonialism that would ensure the interests of the colonialists and save them from the predicament that they faced. It masked colonialism in a very naïve way--a way that only can fool the gullible. The colonialist plans did not change. The colonialists changed the face of their policies. Why could they not respond to the wishes of the resistance men and remove their men with the blue eyes and the blond hair from their midst and replace them with people of their kind who spoke their language and wore lambskin over wolf hearts?
What is wrong with replacing the name of John and Napoleon with Muhammad, Anwar, and Abd-al-Aziz?
Because that period had gone and today's generations have forgotten it, the colonialists decided to repeat the process of masking colonialism before their eyes so they can imagine what happened in the past. This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan when the United States occupied that country and installed an Afghan agent, Hamid Karzai. As everyone can see, this agent has been more eager to promote the interests of the United States than the United States itself, although he has been less successful because of the mujahidin attacks that God ordained against his government.
The Karzai system is the system officially in use in all the Muslim countries. The Karzai method is the same method by which all the rulers were installed, with some difference in details. The legitimacy of every such Karzai is no different from the other. There is no difference between the Karzai of Yemen, the Karzai of Pakistan, the Karzai of Jordan, the Karzai of Qatar, the Karzai of Kuwait, the Karzai of Egypt, and the long list of Karzai traitors ruling the Muslim countries.
The rulers of the land of the Two Holy Mosques [Saudi Arabia] are no different in the above details from others, although the masks the colonialists put on them are so good that they fooled many people. However, the accelerated events and the successive pressures made the situation become clearer. The idol rulers started to say what they used to deny before and make public what they kept secret before.
In the past, Sultan [the Saudi defense minister] denied the presence of foreign forces on Saudi territory, and some people believed him.
Today, they admitted this openly when attention started focusing on the Crusader bases in Al-Kharj and other places, which commanded the Crusader war against Afghanistan and more recently against Iraq. They no longer could make the same mistake of denying the American presence.
In the past, they strongly denied their subserviency to the United States and stressed that their alliance with it was an alliance of mutual interests, and nothing more. When the American pressures increased, Bandar Bin-Sultan [Saudi ambassador in Washington] and Al-Faysal [presumably Foreign Minister Prince Sa'ud al-Faysal] rushed to admit some of the shameful deeds that had no precedent in history.
If one talked about the United States exploitation of the land and its resources, the other announced that the government removed the education of girls from the religious department to satisfy the United States. If one mocked everyone who engaged in the jihad for the sake of God, the other boasted of the secular trend in the Saudi leadership.
This is as far as words are concerned. As for deeds, there is much to say. The aircraft of the Crusader campaign took off from Saudi Arabia. They were supplied with fuel from bases in Saudi Arabia. The supreme command of the war was in the Sultan Base in Saudi Arabia.
There is also much to say about their absolute support for John Garang in southern Sudan in killing the Muslims, their support for communism in southern Yemen before it fell and their support for it when it tried to come back after it fell, their support for the agent Algerian government against the mujahidin when that government was about to fall, and their support for the Russian government when it was killing the Muslims in Chechnya.
The latest episode in their subserviency was their broad cooperation with the United States in pursuing the mujahidin in the world, collecting intelligence information about the mujahidin, and helping the United States arrest them. Because of information collected by the Saudi intelligence agencies, many mujahidin were arrested and many operations in the world and in the United States itself were foiled.
Because of this despicable cooperation, the prisons in Saudi Arabia have become full of prisoners, held on charges of fighting with al-Qa'ida and Taliban against the United States or fighting with Khattab, and recently on charges of attempting to infiltrate into Iraq to fight there. The shari'ah duty imposed on all the nation has become a punishable crime. They are doing all this to please the United States.
No one reviewing ancient or modern history can find an example of agentry or treachery greater than this.
This brings us back to the issue of the veiled colonization of the Islamic countries. No sensible person can disagree that the Saudi government is a cover for the colonialists. Colonialism is manifested in the economy, in the military bases in the country, in political decision-making, and in international relations. Veiled colonialism has reached a point unmatched by direct colonialism. It reached the point of violating honors and removing the education of girls from the authority of the religious department at the orders of the United States, as Al-Faysal said. The 11 September events were not the reason for the Americanization of the system; it only accelerated it, as Bandar Bin-Sultan said.
Could The United States have obtained 1 percent of these interests if it had tried to occupy Saudi Arabia militarily and rallied the Muslims in the entire world?
Was it not better for it to install someone in its place to achieve all its interests?
This was a brief review of the situation in Saudi Arabia. The same--if not worse--is taking place in the other Muslim countries. Look at what is happening in Yemen, Egypt, Kuwait, and other Muslim countries. You can see various pictures of subserviency and treachery that have one thing in common: finding different ways to fight God and his prophet.
One of the important principles observed by veiled colonialism was establishing states combining the largest possible number of Islamic contradictions. They govern by ungodly laws, pay allegiance to The United States and the Crusader countries, turn for justice to the international body in all their cases, embrace the infidels and help them against the Muslims, turn against the religion, pursue the mujahidin, spread evil and atheism and defend them with troops and laws, and participate with The United States and the Crusader countries in their war against the honors, religion, people, and country.
The ruler of a country is the one that has the authority in it. Unless he is an atheist, he can rule even if he lacked the shari'ah conditions, as Shaykh al-Islam Ibn-Taymiyah maintained in the Minhaj al-Sunnah and elsewhere. A ruler who represents lack of sovereignty, reflects subserviency, pays primary attention to the interests of the enemy of the nation, disregards the shari'ah intentions and the interests of his people when they contradict the desires of the enemy of God, his apostle, and his believers is an agent without authority, according to jurisprudence. The real ruler is the Crusader United States. The subserviency of such rulers is no different from the subserviency of the amirs or governors of provinces to the king or the president. The rule of the agent is the rule of the one who made him his agent. Fighters really will be fighting those who put them in this position and made them rulers over the Muslims.
Direct Colonialism:
In view of the above, there is no doubt that to the colonialists, veiled colonialism was better than all other forms of colonialism and the best means for achieving their interests. Therefore, no country is free of it today. The colonialists are seeking to achieve their goals through veiled colonialism because of the strength of the Muslims and not because the enemies of Islam had renounced colonialism, which their religion and economic interests dictate.
However, the Jews--may God's curse be upon them--became so arrogant they could not be satisfied with the veiled colonialism acceptable to the Crusader states. Their occupation of Muslim Palestine was based on an ideology they were unable to give up or abandon or else they would become apostates from Judaism, just as the Arab rulers have become apostates from Islam to which they are affiliated.
The Jewish occupation of the first qiblah used other masks to cover the occupation and many concepts associated with it.
The Palestinian issue became the issue of the Islamic World, the issue of every Muslim, and part of the religion that could not be separated from the Muslim conscience--and this is a fact.
The effort of the Zionist and agent media to neutralize the non-Arab Muslims by calling the Palestinian issue the Arab issue--and repetition has a great effect in falsifying awareness and concealing facts--made every non-Arab Muslim disinterested in the Palestinian issue. Instead of Palestine being their "cause," it became a "cause that they sympathized with and attracted some of their attention." It became the "cause of the Arab Muslims with whom they sympathized and who received part of their attention."
The trumpets of Zionism then focused on the confrontation states and tried constantly to make the Palestinian issue a central issue for Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan and make it an important issue for other Arabs, but not for them.
The Jewish intrigue reached its climax with the establishment of a Palestinian entity to fulfill the role of direct colonialism in areas that were not under Jewish occupation because of the fierce resistance and heroism of the mujahidin in them, like the Gaza Strip.
The establishment of a Palestinian state removed the issue from the hands of the confrontation states. They established a state with an agent government headed by the most despicable agent in history: Yasir Arafat, who will receive what he deserves from God. The issue became secondary to the confrontation states. Attention was focused on the Palestinian state and its leadership. This was accompanied by some acting roles, the latest being the famous siege on Yasir Arafat.
When a Palestinian leadership assumed power and people started looking to it as the official mouthpiece of the Palestinian cause, the Palestinian leadership began playing its despicable historic role, which is to perpetuate colonialism and change the view and treatment of the usurping Israeli entity. It launched a peace process and established coexistence with Zionism as an established fact and as a neighbor with whom it must deal on this basis, even as it was killing Muslims everywhere and at any time.
When the relationship with Israel was hostile, the efforts of Zionism were focused on neutralizing the enemy and confining the confrontation to the least number of Muslim countries. However, when the relationship turned into a relationship of peace, Israel sought to export the peace to the other countries. It began entering one Arab state after another. Initiatives for peace and capitulation were launched. Abdallah Bin-Abd-al-Aziz [the Saudi crown prince] launched his famous initiative to normalize the relations with the Zionist enemy and sell the issue cheaply and, in fact, without anything in return except to continue his subserviency. Shaykh Nasir Bin-Hamad al-Fahd--may God release him from prison--published his book then, entitled "Clarifying the Dangers of Normalization to Muslims." This is a valuable book dealing with the primary issue of the Muslims with unique shari'ah documentation.
It is important to know that the colonialist enemy might give up veiled colonialism and establish, through its armies, explicit colonialism when there is little fear of resistance or the agent leadership could not achieve the interests of colonialism or had deviated--even in a small way--from its hegemony. For this reason, the United States chose to invade Iraq militarily and might choose to invade any Muslim country near or far from Iraq at any time.
The situation of the armies in the agent Islamic states clearly confirms that they almost cannot resist an aggression, particularly an American aggression, because of improper ideological and religious education of the troops and their military preparedness.
The Situation of the Army of the Saudi Government:
There is a special importance to Saudi Arabia. Besides being the subject of this book, it is the cradle and bastion of Islam and the region from which the first conquerors set out.
The sensitivity of its situation demands that this country have a strong army, just as all Muslim countries, as the Almighty said, "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know."
As for the army of the government of Saudi Arabia, the government has spent huge sums of money over many years on the pretext of equipping it with weapons. However, when the country felt the danger of Saddam, the rulers of Saudi Arabia simply announced that the army was unable to defend the country. They allowed the American Crusader armies--in the first precedent in the history of this blessed region of the world--to enter the country and establish fortified bases on the pretext of defending the country. There is no doubt that every occupier defends the country it occupies and exploits its resources for its own benefit, and this is what happened.
The small state of Israel, which has a population of no more than six million people, has an army of more than one million soldiers, and all men able to carry arms are in the reserves. However, in Saudi Arabia, the army is the smallest and weakest in terms of armament, men, equipment, and preparedness to defend our religion and honor.
The defense treaty with the United States prevents the army from procuring weapons except from the United States and its allies. Purchasing Chinese missiles has even become tantamount to disobedience and offense to the American patron.
The American presence in sensitive positions in the army command and American intervention in the country's affairs are no longer a secret. No command and control center in any sector, whether the navy, air force, or army, is without American officers. American technicians also are present in various highly secret sectors, such as in the AWACS [Airborne Warning and Control System] aircraft and satellite communication centers. They are providing abundant information to Israel, which is keen on maintaining its military superiority, because the areas covered by the Saudi AWACS aircraft are within its range of interest. They are also present in other sensitive military sectors, including radar control centers.
The radar system in Saudi Arabia is unique. The equipment in the Kingdom is used only in the United States, Israel, and the Kingdom. All the activities in the Saudi army depend on this radar system, which American satellites can operate much easier than humans in Saudi military bases can.
More clearly, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia can fire Chinese-made strategic missiles at Israel, but the United States can control the missile after it is launched the same way it can control any American missile fired from Sultan Base. The United States can guide this missile to hit any vital installation in Riyadh.
The intention here is not to exaggerate the American strength. The United States can do this not because of its strength, but because of the subserviency of the leadership of Saudi Arabia. If any country can run the radar equipment, the AWACS reconnaissance aircraft, and the air, land, and sea command and control centers, it can occupy a country whenever it wants, and this is exactly what the United States is doing in Saudi Arabia.
The above should not prevent us from drawing attention to all the shari'ah violations and contradictions in totally depending on Western systems in the army. These include such abominations as allowing military law and not God to be the judge, the polytheist method of standing up for the royal anthem, and the military salute, which includes beating the ground with the feet and saluting the rank and not the one who carries it, and copying Western laws shamelessly. If a military rank were placed on a dog, you must salute it, because it is a "royal decree," as they call it. Scholars have written about this, warning against and criminalizing such practices, beginning with the Shaykh Muhammad Bin-Ibrahim--God bless his soul--several contemporary scholars who are being held in prison, and the council of senior ulema, the official fatwa council of the Saudi government. Nevertheless, the situation has remained the same without any change. Is this an army destined to strive in the way of God? Is this an army to be depended upon, after God, in dangerous and gloomy times?
This and other things clearly show that the army was not created to defend the country and carry out the inevitable duty of liberating the Muslim holy places. If people have forgotten about the cause of the Muslims in Palestine and about defending the oppressed Muslims in the entire world, have they forgotten the enemy laying in wait for them who does not find a deterrent in a country if he wanted to occupy it anytime? No one can excuse himself by depending on God. God on whom you want to depend has said to you, "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of God and your enemies." He is the one who also said, "Then fight in God's cause--thou art held responsible only for thyself--and rouse the believers. It may be that God will restrain the fury of the unbelievers; for God is the strongest in might and in punishment."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate
Praise be to God, the Lord of the Universe, and prayers and peace be upon the most righteous Messenger.
God is great, abundant thanks be to God, and praise be to God morning and evening.
The Center's custom has been to issue a statement about every operation carried out by the mujahidin. However, the operation of 11 Rabi al-Awwal 1424 AH [corresponding to 12 May 2003] was special in several respects and demanded that we devote this book to it. The operation was just the first bullet, God willing. The mujahidin needed this detailed statement to explain the demands of jihadi activity in the Arabian Peninsula and to remove some of the ambiguities from the religious and military standpoints.
This book "The Operation of 11 Rabi al-Awwal: The East Riyadh Operation and Our War with the United States and Its Agents" is divided into four chapters:
First: The Situation in the Islamic World
Second: What is the Solution?
Third: Why Riyadh?
Fourth: Have You Not Become Acquainted with the Mujahidin Yet?
CHAPTER ONE: The Situation In The Islamic World
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, one superpower has been leading the world: the United States. Students of history know that two powers have dominated the world in all ages, except in few eras mentioned in history and expositions, like the eras of Solomon, Dhu-al-Qarnayn, Al-Namrud, and Alexander. The fact that two powers checked each other in the world was a mercy from God to humanity. The Almighty said, "And did not God check one set of people by means of another, the earth would indeed be full of mischief."
Judging the current world situation in the light of this historic fact leads us to one of two conclusions:
1. The United States was able to deviate from this rule by virtue of its comprehensive economic, social, and military power, as happened to Solomon--peace be upon him--Dhu-al-Qarnayn, and others. The current situation of the United States rules out this possibility.
2. We live in an unstable international situation or more correctly in a transitional period to which the rules applied in normal conditions do not apply. It also does not have the prerequisites to survive for long.
The second conclusion is definitely the situation that exists in the world today. The United States, which has become the uncontested sole superpower, is adapting to the situation. It got rid of the restrictions, which the conflict with the Soviet Union had imposed on it, and adopted a new policy. This policy is summed up in taking a direct approach to secure its interests in the world without regard to the interest of others, because it considers itself the sole power in the world and the world should adapt to what it wants.
The talk about the United Nations as an independent party ruling the world is nonsense. Perhaps the United Nations was a body whose judgment was sought and accepted by the nations that established it, including the United States. However, today, it is a toy in the hands of World Zionism. The United States ignored the United Nations when it shyly opposed its invasion of Iraq. Three Crusader countries officially participated in the war with it, disregarding the UN resolutions.
Something called the New World Order has recently appeared. The United States designed it as a map for the world it is seeking to shape. Writer Louis Atiyatallah wrote his new book about it: A Clarification of the Reality of This Order.
In view of the above, the situation of the Muslims will only be a reflection of what the United States wants. The situation in some Islamic countries, however, might require some gradual progress in the implementation of the plans to ensure safety against negative results.
We can sum up the issue and say: The Muslim countries today are colonized. Colonialism is either direct or veiled.
Veiled Colonialism:
The past century was the century of the direct colonization of the Muslim countries, under which they languished for many years. This was a time when the Islamic World had reached the highest degree of ideological deviation, polytheism, and disregard for jihad. Colonialism could not find any significant resistance in most countries, particularly at the beginning.
Toward the end of the colonialist era, the colonialist countries were no longer able to bear the painful blows they received from the mujahidin in the colonized countries. They clearly realized that the new generations were moving toward resisting colonialism. They found themselves struggling between the strong desire not to give up their colonies and the painful deterrent posed by the jihad, which they saw growing day after day.
At this stage, Zionism intervened and put its touches on a colonialism that would ensure the interests of the colonialists and save them from the predicament that they faced. It masked colonialism in a very naïve way--a way that only can fool the gullible. The colonialist plans did not change. The colonialists changed the face of their policies. Why could they not respond to the wishes of the resistance men and remove their men with the blue eyes and the blond hair from their midst and replace them with people of their kind who spoke their language and wore lambskin over wolf hearts?
What is wrong with replacing the name of John and Napoleon with Muhammad, Anwar, and Abd-al-Aziz?
Because that period had gone and today's generations have forgotten it, the colonialists decided to repeat the process of masking colonialism before their eyes so they can imagine what happened in the past. This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan when the United States occupied that country and installed an Afghan agent, Hamid Karzai. As everyone can see, this agent has been more eager to promote the interests of the United States than the United States itself, although he has been less successful because of the mujahidin attacks that God ordained against his government.
The Karzai system is the system officially in use in all the Muslim countries. The Karzai method is the same method by which all the rulers were installed, with some difference in details. The legitimacy of every such Karzai is no different from the other. There is no difference between the Karzai of Yemen, the Karzai of Pakistan, the Karzai of Jordan, the Karzai of Qatar, the Karzai of Kuwait, the Karzai of Egypt, and the long list of Karzai traitors ruling the Muslim countries.
The rulers of the land of the Two Holy Mosques [Saudi Arabia] are no different in the above details from others, although the masks the colonialists put on them are so good that they fooled many people. However, the accelerated events and the successive pressures made the situation become clearer. The idol rulers started to say what they used to deny before and make public what they kept secret before.
In the past, Sultan [the Saudi defense minister] denied the presence of foreign forces on Saudi territory, and some people believed him.
Today, they admitted this openly when attention started focusing on the Crusader bases in Al-Kharj and other places, which commanded the Crusader war against Afghanistan and more recently against Iraq. They no longer could make the same mistake of denying the American presence.
In the past, they strongly denied their subserviency to the United States and stressed that their alliance with it was an alliance of mutual interests, and nothing more. When the American pressures increased, Bandar Bin-Sultan [Saudi ambassador in Washington] and Al-Faysal [presumably Foreign Minister Prince Sa'ud al-Faysal] rushed to admit some of the shameful deeds that had no precedent in history.
If one talked about the United States exploitation of the land and its resources, the other announced that the government removed the education of girls from the religious department to satisfy the United States. If one mocked everyone who engaged in the jihad for the sake of God, the other boasted of the secular trend in the Saudi leadership.
This is as far as words are concerned. As for deeds, there is much to say. The aircraft of the Crusader campaign took off from Saudi Arabia. They were supplied with fuel from bases in Saudi Arabia. The supreme command of the war was in the Sultan Base in Saudi Arabia.
There is also much to say about their absolute support for John Garang in southern Sudan in killing the Muslims, their support for communism in southern Yemen before it fell and their support for it when it tried to come back after it fell, their support for the agent Algerian government against the mujahidin when that government was about to fall, and their support for the Russian government when it was killing the Muslims in Chechnya.
The latest episode in their subserviency was their broad cooperation with the United States in pursuing the mujahidin in the world, collecting intelligence information about the mujahidin, and helping the United States arrest them. Because of information collected by the Saudi intelligence agencies, many mujahidin were arrested and many operations in the world and in the United States itself were foiled.
Because of this despicable cooperation, the prisons in Saudi Arabia have become full of prisoners, held on charges of fighting with al-Qa'ida and Taliban against the United States or fighting with Khattab, and recently on charges of attempting to infiltrate into Iraq to fight there. The shari'ah duty imposed on all the nation has become a punishable crime. They are doing all this to please the United States.
No one reviewing ancient or modern history can find an example of agentry or treachery greater than this.
This brings us back to the issue of the veiled colonization of the Islamic countries. No sensible person can disagree that the Saudi government is a cover for the colonialists. Colonialism is manifested in the economy, in the military bases in the country, in political decision-making, and in international relations. Veiled colonialism has reached a point unmatched by direct colonialism. It reached the point of violating honors and removing the education of girls from the authority of the religious department at the orders of the United States, as Al-Faysal said. The 11 September events were not the reason for the Americanization of the system; it only accelerated it, as Bandar Bin-Sultan said.
Could The United States have obtained 1 percent of these interests if it had tried to occupy Saudi Arabia militarily and rallied the Muslims in the entire world?
Was it not better for it to install someone in its place to achieve all its interests?
This was a brief review of the situation in Saudi Arabia. The same--if not worse--is taking place in the other Muslim countries. Look at what is happening in Yemen, Egypt, Kuwait, and other Muslim countries. You can see various pictures of subserviency and treachery that have one thing in common: finding different ways to fight God and his prophet.
One of the important principles observed by veiled colonialism was establishing states combining the largest possible number of Islamic contradictions. They govern by ungodly laws, pay allegiance to The United States and the Crusader countries, turn for justice to the international body in all their cases, embrace the infidels and help them against the Muslims, turn against the religion, pursue the mujahidin, spread evil and atheism and defend them with troops and laws, and participate with The United States and the Crusader countries in their war against the honors, religion, people, and country.
The ruler of a country is the one that has the authority in it. Unless he is an atheist, he can rule even if he lacked the shari'ah conditions, as Shaykh al-Islam Ibn-Taymiyah maintained in the Minhaj al-Sunnah and elsewhere. A ruler who represents lack of sovereignty, reflects subserviency, pays primary attention to the interests of the enemy of the nation, disregards the shari'ah intentions and the interests of his people when they contradict the desires of the enemy of God, his apostle, and his believers is an agent without authority, according to jurisprudence. The real ruler is the Crusader United States. The subserviency of such rulers is no different from the subserviency of the amirs or governors of provinces to the king or the president. The rule of the agent is the rule of the one who made him his agent. Fighters really will be fighting those who put them in this position and made them rulers over the Muslims.
Direct Colonialism:
In view of the above, there is no doubt that to the colonialists, veiled colonialism was better than all other forms of colonialism and the best means for achieving their interests. Therefore, no country is free of it today. The colonialists are seeking to achieve their goals through veiled colonialism because of the strength of the Muslims and not because the enemies of Islam had renounced colonialism, which their religion and economic interests dictate.
However, the Jews--may God's curse be upon them--became so arrogant they could not be satisfied with the veiled colonialism acceptable to the Crusader states. Their occupation of Muslim Palestine was based on an ideology they were unable to give up or abandon or else they would become apostates from Judaism, just as the Arab rulers have become apostates from Islam to which they are affiliated.
The Jewish occupation of the first qiblah used other masks to cover the occupation and many concepts associated with it.
The Palestinian issue became the issue of the Islamic World, the issue of every Muslim, and part of the religion that could not be separated from the Muslim conscience--and this is a fact.
The effort of the Zionist and agent media to neutralize the non-Arab Muslims by calling the Palestinian issue the Arab issue--and repetition has a great effect in falsifying awareness and concealing facts--made every non-Arab Muslim disinterested in the Palestinian issue. Instead of Palestine being their "cause," it became a "cause that they sympathized with and attracted some of their attention." It became the "cause of the Arab Muslims with whom they sympathized and who received part of their attention."
The trumpets of Zionism then focused on the confrontation states and tried constantly to make the Palestinian issue a central issue for Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan and make it an important issue for other Arabs, but not for them.
The Jewish intrigue reached its climax with the establishment of a Palestinian entity to fulfill the role of direct colonialism in areas that were not under Jewish occupation because of the fierce resistance and heroism of the mujahidin in them, like the Gaza Strip.
The establishment of a Palestinian state removed the issue from the hands of the confrontation states. They established a state with an agent government headed by the most despicable agent in history: Yasir Arafat, who will receive what he deserves from God. The issue became secondary to the confrontation states. Attention was focused on the Palestinian state and its leadership. This was accompanied by some acting roles, the latest being the famous siege on Yasir Arafat.
When a Palestinian leadership assumed power and people started looking to it as the official mouthpiece of the Palestinian cause, the Palestinian leadership began playing its despicable historic role, which is to perpetuate colonialism and change the view and treatment of the usurping Israeli entity. It launched a peace process and established coexistence with Zionism as an established fact and as a neighbor with whom it must deal on this basis, even as it was killing Muslims everywhere and at any time.
When the relationship with Israel was hostile, the efforts of Zionism were focused on neutralizing the enemy and confining the confrontation to the least number of Muslim countries. However, when the relationship turned into a relationship of peace, Israel sought to export the peace to the other countries. It began entering one Arab state after another. Initiatives for peace and capitulation were launched. Abdallah Bin-Abd-al-Aziz [the Saudi crown prince] launched his famous initiative to normalize the relations with the Zionist enemy and sell the issue cheaply and, in fact, without anything in return except to continue his subserviency. Shaykh Nasir Bin-Hamad al-Fahd--may God release him from prison--published his book then, entitled "Clarifying the Dangers of Normalization to Muslims." This is a valuable book dealing with the primary issue of the Muslims with unique shari'ah documentation.
It is important to know that the colonialist enemy might give up veiled colonialism and establish, through its armies, explicit colonialism when there is little fear of resistance or the agent leadership could not achieve the interests of colonialism or had deviated--even in a small way--from its hegemony. For this reason, the United States chose to invade Iraq militarily and might choose to invade any Muslim country near or far from Iraq at any time.
The situation of the armies in the agent Islamic states clearly confirms that they almost cannot resist an aggression, particularly an American aggression, because of improper ideological and religious education of the troops and their military preparedness.
The Situation of the Army of the Saudi Government:
There is a special importance to Saudi Arabia. Besides being the subject of this book, it is the cradle and bastion of Islam and the region from which the first conquerors set out.
The sensitivity of its situation demands that this country have a strong army, just as all Muslim countries, as the Almighty said, "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know."
As for the army of the government of Saudi Arabia, the government has spent huge sums of money over many years on the pretext of equipping it with weapons. However, when the country felt the danger of Saddam, the rulers of Saudi Arabia simply announced that the army was unable to defend the country. They allowed the American Crusader armies--in the first precedent in the history of this blessed region of the world--to enter the country and establish fortified bases on the pretext of defending the country. There is no doubt that every occupier defends the country it occupies and exploits its resources for its own benefit, and this is what happened.
The small state of Israel, which has a population of no more than six million people, has an army of more than one million soldiers, and all men able to carry arms are in the reserves. However, in Saudi Arabia, the army is the smallest and weakest in terms of armament, men, equipment, and preparedness to defend our religion and honor.
The defense treaty with the United States prevents the army from procuring weapons except from the United States and its allies. Purchasing Chinese missiles has even become tantamount to disobedience and offense to the American patron.
The American presence in sensitive positions in the army command and American intervention in the country's affairs are no longer a secret. No command and control center in any sector, whether the navy, air force, or army, is without American officers. American technicians also are present in various highly secret sectors, such as in the AWACS [Airborne Warning and Control System] aircraft and satellite communication centers. They are providing abundant information to Israel, which is keen on maintaining its military superiority, because the areas covered by the Saudi AWACS aircraft are within its range of interest. They are also present in other sensitive military sectors, including radar control centers.
The radar system in Saudi Arabia is unique. The equipment in the Kingdom is used only in the United States, Israel, and the Kingdom. All the activities in the Saudi army depend on this radar system, which American satellites can operate much easier than humans in Saudi military bases can.
More clearly, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia can fire Chinese-made strategic missiles at Israel, but the United States can control the missile after it is launched the same way it can control any American missile fired from Sultan Base. The United States can guide this missile to hit any vital installation in Riyadh.
The intention here is not to exaggerate the American strength. The United States can do this not because of its strength, but because of the subserviency of the leadership of Saudi Arabia. If any country can run the radar equipment, the AWACS reconnaissance aircraft, and the air, land, and sea command and control centers, it can occupy a country whenever it wants, and this is exactly what the United States is doing in Saudi Arabia.
The above should not prevent us from drawing attention to all the shari'ah violations and contradictions in totally depending on Western systems in the army. These include such abominations as allowing military law and not God to be the judge, the polytheist method of standing up for the royal anthem, and the military salute, which includes beating the ground with the feet and saluting the rank and not the one who carries it, and copying Western laws shamelessly. If a military rank were placed on a dog, you must salute it, because it is a "royal decree," as they call it. Scholars have written about this, warning against and criminalizing such practices, beginning with the Shaykh Muhammad Bin-Ibrahim--God bless his soul--several contemporary scholars who are being held in prison, and the council of senior ulema, the official fatwa council of the Saudi government. Nevertheless, the situation has remained the same without any change. Is this an army destined to strive in the way of God? Is this an army to be depended upon, after God, in dangerous and gloomy times?
This and other things clearly show that the army was not created to defend the country and carry out the inevitable duty of liberating the Muslim holy places. If people have forgotten about the cause of the Muslims in Palestine and about defending the oppressed Muslims in the entire world, have they forgotten the enemy laying in wait for them who does not find a deterrent in a country if he wanted to occupy it anytime? No one can excuse himself by depending on God. God on whom you want to depend has said to you, "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of God and your enemies." He is the one who also said, "Then fight in God's cause--thou art held responsible only for thyself--and rouse the believers. It may be that God will restrain the fury of the unbelievers; for God is the strongest in might and in punishment."