PDA

View Full Version : Public response to Morbius regarding his claims againts the Qur'aan


abu anas
28th January 2007, 07:58 PM
Assalaam Aleikum wa rahmet Allaahi wa barakaatuhu,
Bismillah Al Rahmaan Al Rahiim,

I have been reading for some time now, the so called responses & refutations Morbius has been making regarding the Qur’aan. Some of his replies are actually quite amazing, since he proves that Paul, as well as Yahweh (who is Jesus, The Father, The Holy Spirit - Christians claim) are liers. Insha'Allah I will do my best to expose your silly claims.

First issue:
You said:
I declare myself as an Orthodox Christian, but I do not adhere blindly to the teachings of the Church. I’d rather not go deeper into explaining my beliefs for I fear that we might dilute this thread.

My Response: Really? Well then, let's stick to the bible and leave out The Council of Nicea, etc etc.

Second issue:
You said:
I know that Bible is a good book and I encourage everyone to read it. But if a man in his life would read nothing else except Bible, such a man would truly be an idiot.

My Response: So, If you were to only read the WORD OF God ( according to you ), it would make you an idiot? Well, nothing much to say here.

Third issue:
You said:
Muhamed accepted story of Adam and Eve from the Old Testament, but Old Testament was wrong on this one.

My Response: Now, you made two claims here. 1) Muhammed(Saaws) copied the story of Adam and Hawwa(as) from the OT. 2) The OT was wrong regarding the story of Adam and Eve.

With regards to your first claim, using your logic, Jesus copied his teachings from the Old Testament. Now you wouldn’t want to say that, now would you? However, you have to understand a couple of things first before making such a wild claim. 1, there was no hard copy of an Old Testament or New Testament written in Arabic, during the time of Muhammed(Saaws). Your own scholars / theologians admit this ( such as Bruce Metzger ). 2, Muhammed (saaws) was an illiterate; he couldn't READ OR WRITE. So please, stop making such wild claims... you’re embarrassing yourself.

Fourth issue:
You said:
Story of Noah was taken from Jews, who took it from Egyptians, who took it from Babylonians. It’s a 5000 years old fairy tale, nothing more.
If you think it’s true, than simply answer me this: How did Noah sail around the world to pick up animals that lived exclusively in America and Australia? How did he travel through large areas of polar ice to find the penguins at the south pole and polar bears at the north pole?
It’s a kid’s story Abdullah, and we are not children any more.

My Response: Once again, thank you. You are showing us that Yahweh (The God of the Old Testament, whom you say is: Jesus, The Father, The Holy Spirit) stole his ideas from his creation. This must also mean that Paul is a lier, since he said in: 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.

Fifth issue:
Someone said:
Finally, what stops God from creating some new animals after the flood, or even today?

You replied back with the following response:
Absolutely nothing. He is not done with our evolution. He is continually making us taller, more intelligent and giving us longer life. Statistics and examinations of ancient necropolises have clearly proven this.

My Response: Wow! Where in the Old Testament, the gospels or the letters of Paul, does it say that we are getting taller, more intelligent and that God is giving us longer life? I know I know.. this is what your men in white coats are teaching you :-]. It's funny however, as a lot of people seem to be getting dumber and dumber? How many christians do you have out there claiming that they worship ONE GOD, when infact it's THREE GOD'S.

The trinity teaches that Jesus is God, the Father is God, the Holy spirit is God. Jesus is NOT the father, nor is he the holy spirit. The Father is NOT Jesus, nor is he the holy spirit. The Holy Spirit is NOT the father, nor is he Jesus. They are CO-EQUAL, CO-EXIST, but they are THREE DISTINCT PERSONS. Yet for some weird reason, 1+1+1=1 for millions and millions of christians.

Finally, alot of christian missionaries assert that according to the Old Testament, our life span is actually DECREASING. Go read the Book of Genesis 6:13 ( 120 years ) -> "and was later shortened to" -> Psalms 90:10 ( 70 to 80 years )

Sixth issue:
Someone said:
You say that the story of Noh (as) was made up, because he couldn't have carried penguins with him, but firstly the scientists claim that all continents were joined together some time before.

You replied back with the following response:
Your chronology is all wrong. Like I told you, the oldest bones of modern-like humans are only about 200 000 years old. Pangaea broke into individual continents much earlier, back in the days when dinosaurs walked the Earth.
I’ll tell you how you can calculate when exactly that happened. Americas keep moving away from Europe and Africa at the speed of 7 meters per year. Take the map of the world and measure how far apart they are now. Divide the two numbers and you’ll know exactly when Pangaea broke apart.

My Response: The oldest bones of modern-like humans are only about 200 000 years old!?!? How can this be!? Morbius, I'm sorry to tell you this, but your holy book teaches that the earth is somewhat 6500 years old. You reach somewhere around 6500 years when you count the period of Adam to Jesus. Refer to the following links for the whole timeline.

http://home1.gte.net/bridavis/timeline.htm (Supported with evidence from the Bible).
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/re1/chapter8.asp

Seventh issue:
In the following post: http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showpost.php?p=12409&postcount=15 Morbius supposedly pointed out Errors in the Qur'aan. I will be refuting his responses and while I'm at it, I will show the reader that Morbius: misquotes, lacks knowledge, and that some of his statements backfires against him.


1) He quotes: 2. MATURITY The Koran mentions that a human being reaches full maturity at age forty (Koran 46:15). This is a very unusual statement. Even today most people accept that full maturity is reached at puberty and laws usually put it between 18 to 21. However, the Koran is scientifically correct where even modern laws are inaccurate. If we analyze the statement based on psychological tests conducted by scientisits, what we find is that the “overall quantity of stored knowledge in the mind of an individual reaches a peak at age thirty-nine and after that it gradually declines.”

His Response: This is very questionable, for many studies find that intellectual peak is reached earlier. (+/-)

My Response: First of all, I hope next time you point out a so-called "error" you back it up with sources. Now, your response is quite funny... "many studies find that intellectual peak is reached earlier". Wow? Is that it? Now note: not all studies agree with their final results. Take example of the quote above and the studies that you referred to. Scientists have their own ideas on when a human reaches intellectual peak. But what we have is Allah(Swt) telling us when Man reaches full strenght.
(and reaches forty years,) meaning, his complete intellect, understanding, and patience reach the level of maturity. It has also been said that usually one will not change his ways once he reaches the age of forty. <Tafsir Ibn Kathir>

2) He quotes: THE FEMALE BEE The Koran mentions the bee, which leaves its home in search for food, in the verses that discusses honey (Koran 16:68,69). It uses the female verb in describing the bee, in Arabic faslukee. This, to the Arab, suggests that the bee, which leaves its home in search for food, is female.Does anyone except an expert know how to differentiate between a male and a female bee?

His Response: This is incorrect. Domestic honey bees that gather nectar are not female or male, they are just drones and they have no gender. This is one of the errors of Quran. (-)

My Response: What in the world are you talking about? Stop acting like you're the master of the sciences of Evolution, embryology, biology etc.etc. And for the love of God, will you please back your claims up with sources?
Now, I opened up WEBSTER'S UNIVERSAL COLLEGE DICTIONARY, and the description of a drone is the following:
-Drone: 1. the MALE of the honeybee and other bees that are stingless and MAKE NO HONEY.
Since you like to give people links to sites, I'm going to do the same to you:
http://www.bbka.org.uk/faq.php explains the following: How Many Types Of Bees Are In A Honeybee Colony?
Three types, a single queen, thousands of female workers and in the summer hundreds of male drones. The drone bee does no work however in the early autumn they are evicted by the workers and die.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bees/hivedron.html explains the following: The males or drones have one purpose in life: to mate with the queen. Nature has given them extra-large eyes to ensure that they do not lose sight of the queen on the mating flight. At the appropriate time, drones meet at special mating areas far from the hive, where they attempt to mate with the queen at heights of up to 100 feet off the ground. (See The Making Of for a description of how the filmmakers got around the height problem to film an in-flight mating.)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bees/hivework.html explains the following: Worker bees are all female and make up about 85 percent of nest bees. They have three life stages, during which they have specific roles to fill. Young workers (1 to 12 days old) clean cells, nurse the brood, and tend the queen. Middle-aged workers (12 to 20 days old) build the comb, store nectar and pollen brought by forager bees, and ventilate the nest (see temperature). Older workers (20 days to 30 days or more, the rough life expectancy of a honeybee), are primarily foragers who supply nectar and provide the enzymes needed for converting it to honey. Flying at a speed of about 15 miles per hour, each can travel more than three and a half miles from home on a single flight. Bee researcher Thomas Seeley has likened this capability to a five-foot-tall person "flying" 375 miles, the distance from Boston to Washington, or from Berlin to Zürich.
http://www.hivetool.com/guide/dronebee.htm explains the following: The Drone Bee
The drones are the male bees in the colony. Their sole function is reproduction. Drones who succeed in mating with a queen during her nuptial flight perish in the act. Drones are larger and heavier than the workers, but not as long as the queen. It is easy to identify a drone by its large compound eyes that come together at the top of the head.
http://www.hivetool.com/guide/workerbee.htm explains the following: The Worker Bee
The worker bees, although females, lack the fully developed reproductive organs of the queen. Normally they do not lay eggs, although if the colony is without a queen, or queen cell, a few workers may begin to lay drone eggs. A colony in such a condition is termed a laying worker colony.
The worker bees perform all the labor of the hive. They are equipped with "pollen baskets" on their hind legs and special wax glands which begin to function when they are approximately 10 days old.
So what are you going to tell the readers now? Obviously you have no knowledge on this issue and simply want to attack the Qur'aan because you know it's the truth.

3) He quotes: 9. THE DEATH OF STARS The Koran mentions the ‘death of stars’ (Koran 77:7-8). Astronomers including Dr. Patterson of Southwest Missouri State are surprised at finding this information in the Koran. They know that at the time of Muhammad, people believed that once a thing was formed, it was permanent. The Koran is very accurate when it mentions dying stars. Our own sun is a dying star.

His Response: But Quran doesn’t mention that stars are dying all the time, but infact states that they’ll all go at once at the Day of Decision. (-)

My Response: What are you claiming here? Please, post the surah and aayah before you make such a claim. You wouldn't want me saying something about Paul of Tarsus or the Holy spirit without any evidence from the New Testament, now would you?

4) He quotes: 11. MOVEMENT OF THE SUN. The sun’s movement is not something that is evident to our eyes or experience but requires specialized equipment. The Koran states in chapter 36, verse 39: “And the sun constantly journeys towards a homing place for it and for the moon, We have determined phases (36:39).”

His Response: Quran also speaks of the traveler who saw place from where the Sun rises and muddy pond where it sets. Forget it. (-)

My Response: Well, It's crystal clear now that you have been reading anti islamic sites that do nothing but misquote & misinterpret the Qur'aan.
I like the way you wrote your response though, "Traveler WHO SAW place from where the sun rises and muddy where it sets".

Exactly! HE (Dhul Qarnayn) Found the sun setting in a muddy spring. Did you catch it? Allah(Swt) Informs us how Dhul Qarnayn saw the sun setting. It wasn't Allah(Swt) explaining HOW THE SUN SETS. Here is the verse you are pointing to:
"Till, when he reached the setting-place of the sun, HE FOUND IT setting in a muddy spring, and found a people thereabout. We said: O Dhu'l-Qarneyn! Either punish or show them kindness. 18:86" (In arabic: wajada )
Ibn Kathir(rah) Explains this aayah well in his Tafsir:
(Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun,) means, he followed a route until he reached the furthest point that could be reached in the direction of the sun's setting, which is the west of the earth. As for the idea of his reaching the place in the sky where the sun sets, this is something impossible, and the tales told by storytellers that he traveled so far to the west that the sun set behind him are not true at all. Most of these stories come from the myths of the People of the Book and the fabrications and lies of their heretics.
(he found it setting in a spring of Hami'ah) meaning, he saw the sun as if it were setting in the ocean. This is something which everyone who goes to the coast can see: it looks as if the sun is setting into the sea but in fact it never leaves its path in which it is fixed. Hami'ah is, according to one of the two views, derived from the word Hama'ah, which means mud.

5) He quotes: 12. ISOSTACY AND MOUNTAIN ROOTS The Koran states that mountains are like “tent-pegs”, i.e. they have a root extending down into the earth like “anchors” and this gives stability and balance to the earth.“Have we not expanded the earth and made the mountains as tent pegs” (Koran 78:6-7)” We have cast into the earth anchors lest it shake with you” (Koran 31:10 etc.)

His Response: True, mauntains made by tectonic movements indeed have such “roots”, but it’s exactly because of such roots that epicenter of earthquakes is usually at the foot of the mountain. Roots do not help with earthquakes, but provoke them. (-)

My Response: You have to understand that the function of the mountain in the Qur'aan, is given to prevent the earth from SHAKING. Nowhere does the Qur'aan say that the mountain prevents earthquakes. I'm going to quote Dr. Zakir Naik on this one:
Taken from: "The Qur’an and the Bible in the light of Science" - Debate between Dr.Zakir Naik and Dr William Campbell.
"And if you read the book ‘The Earth’ which is referred by almost all the universities, in the field of Geology, one of its authors by the name of Dr Frank Press, who was the advisor to the former president of USA, Jimmy Carter, and was the president of the Academy of Science of USA. He writes in his book that…‘The mountains are wedge shaped - It has deep roots within. And he says that…‘The function of the mountain is to stabilize the earth.’ And the Qur’an says in Surah Ambiya, Ch. No 21, Verse No. 31, in Surah Luqman, Ch. No. 31 Verse No.10, as well as in Surah Nahl, Ch. No. 16, Verse No. 15, that…‘We have made the mountains standing firm on the Earth, lest it would shake with them and with you.’ The function of the mountain in the Qur’an, is given to prevent the Earth from shaking. Nowhere does the Qur’an say that the mountain prevents the earthquake. And Dr. William Campbell said - He writes in his book, and even the talk, that… ‘You find in the mountains regions, there are various earthquakes, and mountains cause earthquake.’ Point to be noted - Nowhere does the Qur’an say that mountains prevent earthquake. The Arabic word for ‘earthquake’ as Dr. William Campbell knows Arabic, is ‘zilzaal’ or ‘zalzala’- But the words used in these three Verses I quoted, it is ‘Tamida.’ ‘Tamida’ means ‘to shake’, ‘to ‘sway’, ‘to swing.’ And Qur’an says in Surah Luqman, Ch. 31, Verse No. 10, as well as Surah Nahl, Ch. No. 16 Verse No. 15…‘We have put on the earth mountains standing firm, lest it would shake with you. It is ‘tamide bikum’…‘Shake with you’, Indicating, if the mountains were not there, if you would have walked, if you would have moved, even the earth would have moved with you - If you would have swayed, even the earth would have swayed with you. And we know normally when we walk on the Earth, the Earth does not shake, and the reason for this is, according to Dr. Frank Press and Dr. Najjat who is from Saudi Arabia, and he wrote a full book on the Geological concepts in the Qur’an, answering almost every thing what Dr. William Campbell has said - in detail. And Dr. William Campbell in his book, he writes that…‘If mountains prevent the shaking of the earth, then how come you find earthquakes in the mountains regions.’ I said, No where does the Qur’an say, mountains prevent earthquake. Earthquake is ‘zilzaal’ - and if you see the definition in the Oxford dictionary, it says… Earthquake is due to convulsion of the superficial crust of the Earth, due to relief of compressed Siesmic waves, due to crack in the rock, or due to volcanic reaction. The Qur’an speaks about ‘zalzala’ in Surah Zalzaal, Ch. 99 - But here it speaks about ‘tamida bikum’- ‘to prevent the earth from shaking with you.’ And in reply to the statement…‘That if mountains prevent earthquakes, how come you find earthquakes in mountainous regions ?’ The reply is, that - If I say that medical doctors, they prevent the sickness and disease in a human being, and if someone argues…‘If doctors prevent the sickness and diseases in a human being, how come you find more sick people in the hospitals, where there are more doctors than at home - where there are no doctors.’"

I recommend the readers in this forum the following book that touches on "The Geological Concept of Mountains in the Quran" By Dr.Zaghloul El-Nagger: http://www.waqfeya.com/open.php?cat=30&book=792´


7) He said: I already wrote about mistakes in Quran about human conception, here: http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showpost.php?p=12367&postcount=123

My Response: Well this is an old claim which you can find in my Anti-Islamic site. It has already been dealt with so i will refer the reader to the rebuttal: http://www.answering-christianity.com/munir_munshey/semenproduction_rebuttal.htm

8) SIDE NOTE: Id like to ask Morbius what does he think about the GIANTS mentioned in the book of genesis 6:4: [There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare [children] to them, the same [became] mighty men which [were] of old, men of renown.] I recommend you read the Book of Enoch, if you have no idea how these Giants were born ;-].

His Conclusion: Six pluses. Six places where Quran was right about scientific facts that were not known at the time of its writing. I must say that I was pretty impressed with some of these scientific facts present in the book. Despite of the places where Quran was scientifically wrong, parts of it impressed me very much, especially Muhamed’s knowledge that Universe was in gaseous state and that it is expanding.

My Response: [I]All your claims and accusations about where the Qur'aan was scientifically wrong has been refuted. Now here is My Conclusion: Where could Muhammed(Saaws) have possibly obtained ALL these informations? (A man living in the middle of the desert, Illiterate, never went to school, only spoke Arabic etc)… All these information on science, the information of what was to happen in the future, the information of the past ( the stories of the prophets, Adam, Idris, Nuh, Ibrahim, Ismail, Ishaq, Lut, Shu'aib, Salih, Hud, Yaqub, Yusuf, Musa, Harun, Ilyas, Alyassa, Dawud, Sulayman, Zakariyya, Yahya, Ayyub, Dhul Kifl, Yunus, Isa ibn Maryam ), the challenges the Allah(swt) proposed to those who disbelieved in Muhammed(Saaws).

Verily, Allah(swt) challenged the Jews in surah al baqarah ayaat 94-95 [Say: "If the last Home, with God, be for you specially, and not for anyone else, then seek ye for death, if ye are sincere." But they will never seek for death, on account of the (sins) which their hands have sent on before them. And God is well-acquainted with the wrong-doers.]

All that they (the Jews) had to do was to WISH for death, and the Qur'aan would have been proven to be false. But what about the christians? Allah(Swt) challenged them as well, in surah Aal-Imraan aayah 61 [(Then whoever disputes with you concerning him (`Isa) after (all this) knowledge that has come to you (i.e. `Isa) being a servant of Allah, and having no share in divinity), say (O Muhammad ): "Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves ? then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the curse of Allah upon those who lie.'')]

Till this very day, Allah(swt) has set out challenges to those who reject the Qur'aan. In surah An Nisa ayaat 82 [Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.]

If you want to prove the Qur'aan wrong, just point out ONE CONTRADICTION, ONE ERROR. It is that easy. Since the time of Muhammad(Saaws) to our period of time, you have many people claiming contradictions in the Qur'aan, Errors in the Qur'aan. But what all these people do is misquote or misinterpet, just like what you have been doing.

But the greatest challenge of them all, which many have attempted and have failed misreably. In surah Al-Israa aayah 88 ["Say: 'If all mankind and the jinn would come together to produce the like of this Qur’aan, they could not produce its like even though they exerted all and their strength in aiding one another.’"] Allah(Swt) then made the challenge easier, In surah Hud aayah 13 ["Or do they say that he has invented it? Say (to them), 'Bring ten invented soorahs like it, and call (for help) on whomever you can besides Allaah, if you are truthful."] Allah(swt) then makes the challenge even more easier, In surah Al-Baqarah aayaht 23: ["And if you all are in doubt about what I have revealed to My servant, bring a single soorah like it, and call your witnesses besides Allaah if you are truthful." ] The shortest surah in Qur'aan is but three verses (Surah Al-Kauthar), yet till this very day, NO ONE has ever been able to complete the challenges Allah(Swt) has put forward to those in doubt.

I Ask Allah(Swt) to make this Rebuttal beneficial to all those who read it. I Ask Allah(Swt) to reward the efforts of the muslims in this forum. I Ask Allah(Swt) to guide Morbius to the truth, insha'Allah.

Wassalaam Aleikum wa rahmet Allaahi wa barakaatuhu.

Your brother in Islam, Abu Anas.

morbius
29th January 2007, 05:44 PM
It’s not that I don’t appreciate the effort you went through to compile this lengthy response, but I simply do not have enough time to answer all this at once, plus most of my resources on these matters remained on a computer that I gave to my brother for Christmas, so it would take me longer to search for it all over again. I would have preferred it if you actually took some time to meditate on my words instead of simply contradicting and sometimes twisting everything I say, but anyway I will try to provide you with answers you wanted.

First issue:
I have read and inquired a lot about various religions, both living and dead. I have never come across a single religion that didn’t have errors in their teachings. But that doesn’t mean that many of those religions didn’t have truths in them either.
We shouldn’t turn a blind eye or apologize for mistakes in our religious teachings, but we shouldn’t forget the truths in their teachings either.

Second issue:
Man needs a lot of knowledge in various fields to begin to understand this world properly. It is ridiculous to think that one could learn everything he should know only from Bible or Quran. We must seek the knowledge in other fields, too.

Third issue:
Story of Adam and Eve was not told by Jesus, it comes from Old Testament. I can’t remember Jesus ever mentioning it and I’m pretty familiar with the Bible.

Secondly, Muhamed didn’t have to read the Bible. Someone probably narrated it to him, which would explain why all the Biblical names were reported wrong in Quran. More probable option is that he in the later part of his work on Quran had Christian scholars to help him. Later Suras do show greater complexity than Muhamed’s early work.


More to follow….

knowrass
29th January 2007, 05:55 PM
First issue:
I have read and inquired a lot about various religions, both living and dead. I have never come across a single religion that didn’t have errors in their teachings. But that doesn’t mean that many of those religions didn’t have truths in them either.
We shouldn’t turn a blind eye or apologize for mistakes in our religious teachings, but we shouldn’t forget the truths in their teachings either.

well, since you're a "truthseeker", shouldn't you be more objective? instead of relying on what orientalists or anti-islam/pro-christianity sites have to say about the qur'aan, why not conduct a genuine research of your own? everyone's got their own agenda, create your own...

Secondly, Muhamed didn’t have to read the Bible. Someone probably narrated it to him, which would explain why all the Biblical names were reported wrong in Quran. More probable option is that he in the later part of his work on Quran had Christian scholars to help him. Later Suras do show greater complexity than Muhamed’s early work.

don't you think that it's important to bring up facts in an intellectual debate? probabilities do not mean anything here. until YOU have proof of what you're saying its better to bring it up, otherwise you're just making a fool out of yourself. just as there those baseless probabilities you gave, there will always be other opposing "probabilities" (which you clearly oppose and do not even want to consider, because they don't suite your whims and desires)... and these opposing probabilities, in fact, are more "factual" (as they are regarding the truth of the qur'aan) than your baseless claims.

since you supposedly speak arabic so well, please tell us about the wrong biblical names in the qur'aan? ...or would you like to admit that you rely on english translations?!

Aburafay
29th January 2007, 08:59 PM
Here is a statement that shouts his ignorance, and arrogance, so I have stopped replyingto him:


I do not think that shariah is divine law. We are pleased with our man-made laws, thank you very much.
If you want to live by shariah than do so, but you must also respect the choice of people who have no desire to follow your ways. Sadly, Islam is a very intolerant religion which speaks against true peace and cooperation between Muslim and non-Muslim societies.
Post 22 in http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showthread.php?t=2593&page=3

mika
29th January 2007, 09:39 PM
Hi Aburafay

How can you defend a middleage concept called shariah, Morbius is fully right, come on, ofcourse man made laws shall, be the valid rules, time has shown that socalled divine rules only lead to ditatorship.

We saw that in the middle age, when socalled divine rules ruled in Europe, and the christian church denied all kind of new thinking that could be a threat to it's existance, and we see the exate same happen in the Muslim world today.

My dear friends, why don't you ever ask your self why all scientific and techilogical progress has developed in the western world, where new development and within science, and art, more or less are none exhisting in Islamic countries.

Therefore my friends, be MUCH more chritical to you religion (Islam), do not "buy" old rules given to you through "devine sharia", you really deserve better:)

Best regards
Mika

Umm Ahmed
29th January 2007, 10:02 PM
Mika,

Watch what your saying just because you believe in freedom to do what ever you deem fit, does not make your way right !
Islam is for all time, if the opposite was true then we would be stagnant in many aspects of our life , muslims undergo transplants Muslims undergo fertilisation because divine law has given us leeway , but hey we cant expect you to understand that because your not a scholar .

My dear friends, why don't you ever ask your self why all scientific and techilogical progress has developed in the western world, where new development and within science, and art, more or less are none exhisting in Islamic countries.
Save your ignorant comments for someone who cares ,
Iran is a muslim country and is doing well in all sciences but of course thats all going to be squashed by the bully of the world .

Yes the elders of the church used to burn scientists , thats not happened in the Islamic world.
The internet is a tool you need to use more wisely educate yourself instead of having these backward ideas that Islam is only able to deal with the past.
You were all full of nicety in the other thread asking your questions but now your showing your true colours , people like you talk about being fair and being free to choose, but from your comments in the above post, its plain to see choice and fairness are only for your miserable self .

mika
29th January 2007, 11:37 PM
Dear Umm-Ahmed,

Thanks for commenting my post.

Yes I am certainly critizising shariah, and so should you, and everybody else, and I am not the only one that think this, I can guarentee that millions of muslims agree about this.

I am not saying this to offend you Umm-Ahmed, certainly not, I say that because I care for mankind, and because mankind should be protected against such law as shariah, including yourself Umm-Ahmed.

With regards to if I am a scholar, or not, don't you think that we all have the right to have an oppinion, and express it, not depending if we are a scholar or not?

Wit regards to Iran doing well in science, Russia did the same under the communism, North Kores are doing well, but common for this kind of societies is that they have a scientific elite that are well treated by the ditators that govers the country, in the Iranian case, the Islamic regime in Theran.
The kind of science developed in Iran are not for boosting industries that can export technology to for eksamble the west and benefit the Iranian population, instead the very skilled sciensetists are used in the military industry.

By the way, the internet that both you and enjoy, are a result of a complete free development, where the goal were to let people like you and me communicate, the nternet is a result free thinking where the creators were not restricted by govaments that were afriad that the people should become too free, I guess that you enjoy the internet too..

And then with regards to my posts in the other thread, my intention has never been to fool anybody, just to understand why you all are so afriad the somebody are free to chose their religion..or change if they feel that it is not good for them.

Best regards
Mika

Umm Ahmed
30th January 2007, 02:47 AM
Dear Umm-Ahmed,

Thanks for commenting my post.

Yes I am certainly critizising shariah, and so should you, and everybody else, and I am not the only one that think this, I can guarentee that millions of muslims agree about this.

I should critize the sharia ? oh pray do tell us what you in all your wisdom and knowledge of Islam can say against the sharia . No alcohol ? does that interfere with your tippling on a weekend does it ? no sex before marriage maybe that annoys you ? of course you and your ilk dont mind unwed mothers , aids and the other social ills that come along with premarital sex

I am not saying this to offend you Umm-Ahmed, certainly not, I say that because I care for mankind, and because mankind should be protected against such law as shariah, including yourself Umm-Ahmed.
In case you dont know I chose Islam for my religion , as have thousands of others. Islam is the fastest growing religion , thats a fact, so people are choosing the sharia wither you like it or not . your opinion bears no weight in this matter.

With regards to if I am a scholar, or not, don't you think that we all have the right to have an oppinion, and express it, not depending if we are a scholar or not?

Your opinion is not based on anything except your ignorance of Islam .

Wit regards to Iran doing well in science, Russia did the same under the communism, North Kores are doing well, but common for this kind of societies is that they have a scientific elite that are well treated by the ditators that govers the country, in the Iranian case, the Islamic regime in Theran.
The kind of science developed in Iran are not for boosting industries that can export technology to for eksamble the west and benefit the Iranian population, instead the very skilled sciensetists are used in the military industry..

Sorry to inform you but as Iran is just across the water from me, I can tell you Iran is not like the Iran that is potrayed on the telly and the newspapers . For a country that has been at war so many times and lives under sanctions privitisation is on the uprise , trade delegations are here. Tourists come here all the time they are not the elite , just ordinary people like anyone else. Anyway that was not my point . The point is that Islam allows science but we have guidelines which are in place to stop us going mad.

By the way, the internet that both you and enjoy, are a result of a complete free development, where the goal were to let people like you and me communicate, the nternet is a result free thinking where the creators were not restricted by govaments that were afriad that the people should become too free, I guess that you enjoy the internet too..

My point again was to hint that you use the internet to learn about Islam .
Here is a list of sites you can go to .
www.islamway.com
http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?ln=eng
www.islamweb.com
I also encourage you to listen to lectures by Bilal Phillips on Islam and science those are freely available on the net
As you can see I am a woman using the internet in a muslim country wow isnt that fantastic ehh , my children all go to school oh surprise surprise they actually get science as a subject oh and modern studies .
Ignorance is not bliss , educate yourself about something before you attack someone else's beliefs.

And then with regards to my posts in the other thread, my intention has never been to fool anybody, just to understand why you all are so afriad the somebody are free to chose their religion..or change if they feel that it is not good for them.

Best regards
Mika

Double standards !


Now lets leave this thread to abu anas and Morbius

chase
30th January 2007, 09:45 AM
Mika:


I am only starting to learn about Islam. Until recently I held what I thought was a firm belief in Nationalism. It seemed
to offer a system of social organisation which would have discipline and free up the constructive energies of the individuals which live within it.

I have to tell you that I have come to the conclusion that many of the people in my country would make poor "vessels" for Nationalist beliefs. I don't think we are emotionally and spiritually developed enough to handle ideas like this - They would become very dangerous ideas that would let loose all kinds of volatile negativity and hatred.

There is no longer the necessary morality underpinning our society. The recent height of our culture has been watching ten contestants parade around a sealed house exposing their inner thoughts and feelings to the nation.

It is perhaps time to evolve!

How can a society like ours be entrusted with scientific knowledge .

1. We have more or less destroyed the environment beyond a point of repair.

2.We are unravelling nature's genetic codes without having a clue how to weave the original patterns back if we find we need to do so.

3. We are at war with many other countries and have the capacity to annihilate all life on this planet.

Would you would trust this level of knowledge to people who lack the necessary innate morality to deal with the responsibilities it brings ?

Whilst we in the West were watching a parade of superficial emotion on the TV , Muslims were praying around the world about very real issues, each of them holding and sharing a more positive vision.

chase
30th January 2007, 11:04 AM
Just a footnote:

Recently a cartel in our country managed to generate enough capital to undertake a very large project. So large it needed the backing of the government.

Did these people want to create a healthcare system , a huge social/education centre/ perhaps something constructive for our society?

No! They want to build a Super-Casino to take more money from our citizens. These places will destroy the lives and families
of many of those who use them.

Aburafay
30th January 2007, 04:50 PM
Just a footnote:


Well said.

mika
30th January 2007, 06:45 PM
:) Dear Umm-Ahmed, and Chase,

Thanks for responding to me.

First I will respond to you Umm-Ahmed:

I should critize the sharia? oh pray do tell us what you in all your wisdom and knowledge of Islam can say against the sharia . No alcohol ? does that interfere with your tippling on a weekend does it ? no sex before marriage maybe that annoys you ? of course you and your ilk dont mind unwed mothers , aids and the other social ills that come along with premarital sex
Umm-Ahmed your statement above simply reflect fear, fear of things you have been told will be a result of a non controlled sharia sociaty.
It is a huge question to me why you are so afriad of alcohol, of course alcohold can be a problem if you get too much, then you get sick, but if it is enjoyed in moderate amount(which most people do), it i very nice and can actually be very healthy.
Something must have got completely out of hand when this none-alcohol thing were enforced in Islam.
With regard to that sharia will prevent aids, thats is simply rubbish, aids is basically transferred by the blood, so millions of people are having aids through blood transfusion, including muslins.
With regards to if women wants to have children without being married, why shall Allah be the judge here..by means of sharia...again Umm-Ahmed it is a personal choice.
I have friends that have kids, and where the mother is alone by ovn choice, in your opinion, according to sharia, what should happen to her, is she not allowed to decide this herself?

In case you dont know I chose Islam for my religion, as have thousands of others. Islam is the fastest growing religion, that’s a fact, so people are choosing the sharia wither you like it or not . your opinion bears no weight in this matter.
I am sure you have chosen Islam by yourself, and if you are happy by that, ofcourse I have no problem with that, in the meantime, within Islam, the problems would start the day you realized that you did not want to be a muslim anymore. With regards to oppinions Umm-Ahmed, I am absolutely sure that both our opinions count:)

With regards to the muslim world, it is a fact the the export (execpt from oil&gas that has been there always) is extremely low from this part of the world compared to the average education level of the population.
As an example, don't you ever ask yourself about why there is no real products produced in for example UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and here I am not talking about basic fabric, and food products??

Umm-Ahmed, to built a culture where mankind over time have the entrepreneurship to develop software, invent new fantastic medicine that cure diseases, ect, you NEED an society that are not based on punishment ad fear, and that is why these things are invented in the west, and not in a Islam society where shria would kill the foundation for these great inventions.
First when you begin to doubt and ask questions, things will change to the better for mankind, else you just accept to live under dictatorship and fear, and that is not fair to you I think.

As you can see I am a woman using the internet in a muslim country wow isn’t that fantastic ehh , my children all go to school oh surprise they actually get science as a subject oh and modern studies .
Ignorance is not bliss , educate yourself about something before you attack someone else's beliefs.
No ofcourse it is not fantastic that you are using the internet, that is great, so you and I can communicate, in the meantime what would have been REALLY fantastic would have been if the internet were invented in the Islam world, you that is the difference, do you see my point.
The fact that you children goes to school and learn get science as subject, and modern studies is great, that hopefully also open their eyes to ask questions, and not always accept things as they are, just because they are stated in a book...;)

In the end Umm-Ahmed, the west is not paradise, absolutely not, but you must understand the the so called personal freedom that we enjoy here where all can chose their life as they want (chose you religion, you work, if you want to get married, ect) is a cornerstone here, we enjoy it, and for us it is simply so sad to see a hole culture like the Islam world, live in fear, and consider life as a simple state which only purpose is to "behave", so you are not being roasted in hell, life is beautiful, enjoy and celebrate it instead, don't you agree?


To Chase,

I seems that you have found a new direction in life, and that is great, if this is your ovn will, no problen with me, on the other hand, have you considered if one day would regrets your choice?
According to what I have learned in this forum, it could have serious consequences....;)

With regards to Nationalism, I can only agree, I am certainly not a Nationalist my self.

With regards to the casino, it is maybe not very wise, I agree on that, on the other hand we also see the thousands of huge expensive mosques built in the Islam world these days.....these money could have been spend much better for food for the poor people, don't you agree?

Best regards Mika

Umm Ahmed
30th January 2007, 09:15 PM
:) Dear Umm-Ahmed, and Chase,

Thanks for responding to me.

First I will respond to you Umm-Ahmed:


Umm-Ahmed your statement above simply reflect fear, fear of things you have been told will be a result of a non controlled sharia sociaty.
It is a huge question to me why you are so afriad of alcohol, of course alcohold can be a problem if you get too much, then you get sick, but if it is enjoyed in moderate amount(which most people do), it i very nice and can actually be very healthy.
Something must have got completely out of hand when this none-alcohol thing were enforced in Islam.


You dont speak for me I can speak for myself fear ? how on earth have you come to the conclusion that my statement reflects a fear of shaira is beyond me, but then again your only going by your opinion. Its an opnion that I dont want to hear thankyou very much .

As for alcohol I can speak from first hand experience about the ill affects it has on society and if your turning a blind eye to that then thats your problem not mine .

With regard to that sharia will prevent aids, thats is simply rubbish, aids is basically transferred by the blood, so millions of people are having aids through blood transfusion, including muslins.
With regards to if women wants to have children without being married, why shall Allah be the judge here..by means of sharia...again Umm-Ahmed it is a personal choice.

Which year did the Dr's relalise that aids was spreading through the blood ? then ask yourself how is aids still spreading.

I have friends that have kids, and where the mother is alone by ovn choice, in your opinion, according to sharia, what should happen to her, is she not allowed to decide this herself?

I really think your living in a dream world, or you only mix with hippies most unwed mothers are in that state because of premarital sex and a lot of them were in a drunken state . I've been a non muslim longer than I have been a muslim , out of my friends from school 5 of them had abortions when still at school . Stop lying to yourself.


I am sure you have chosen Islam by yourself, and if you are happy by that, ofcourse I have no problem with that, in the meantime, within Islam, the problems would start the day you realized that you did not want to be a muslim anymore. With regards to oppinions Umm-Ahmed, I am absolutely sure that both our opinions count:)

No your own opinions are based on your own whims , mines are based on truth and divine law a law that suits us best , how can one who follows his own whims and desires ever expect to be happy. When one looks at those who have it all in a me me society they dont seem to be very happy and are usually to be found in rehab clinics for little holidays .

With regards to the muslim world, it is a fact the the export (execpt from oil&gas that has been there always) is extremely low from this part of the world compared to the average education level of the population.
As an example, don't you ever ask yourself about why there is no real products produced in for example UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and here I am not talking about basic fabric, and food products??

UAE and Saudi Arabia are fledging countries 30 years ago they were shepherds ,although places like Dubai have always traded through Asia , they have made tremendous progress in such a short time . Iran has always had active trade with Asia just because we in the west know nothing about the other parts of the world . Please refer to The history of Iran you can go through the google who knows what wonders you will find .

Umm-Ahmed, to built a culture where mankind over time have the entrepreneurship to develop software, invent new fantastic medicine that cure diseases, ect, you NEED an society that are not based on punishment ad fear, and that is why these things are invented in the west, and not in a Islam society where shria would kill the foundation for these great inventions.
First when you begin to doubt and ask questions, things will change to the better for mankind, else you just accept to live under dictatorship and fear, and that is not fair to you I think.

No we need a society thats fair for all which is within the sharia , we need lower crime that can only be acomplished through the sharia . Dictatorships that you might be referring to were not ruled Islamicly . Who says as soon as we are allowed to by America and UK we cant invent things ? again your ignorance comes to bear , you seem to think that muslims have not invented anything . dont you know how to use the google ? http://www.ummah.net/history/scholars/index.html


No ofcourse it is not fantastic that you are using the internet, that is great, so you and I can communicate, in the meantime what would have been REALLY fantastic would have been if the internet were invented in the Islam world, you that is the difference, do you see my point.
The fact that you children goes to school and learn get science as subject, and modern studies is great, that hopefully also open their eyes to ask questions, and not always accept things as they are, just because they are stated in a book...

We are not that advanced yet but we will be inshaa Allah
Your still not getting it are you . Islam and science all go hand in hand it always has .

In the end Umm-Ahmed, the west is not paradise, absolutely not, but you must understand the the so called personal freedom that we enjoy here where all can chose their life as they want (chose you religion, you work, if you want to get married, ect) is a cornerstone here, we enjoy it, and for us it is simply so sad to see a hole culture like the Islam world, live in fear, and consider life as a simple state which only purpose is to "behave", so you are not being roasted in hell, life is beautiful, enjoy and celebrate it instead, don't you agree?

No where is paradise on this earth because humans are not perfect , this is our test . I live with muslims I dont see sadness , I see humblness I see piety happy glowing faces I dont see what you see , but I and all muslims pity those who are living in misery in the darkness with no enlightment , dingy dark faces who only live for the weekend where they find their freedom in the disco or at the end of a pint. Thats why its our duty as muslims to bring people out of that blanket of darkness to the light of Islaam .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDq3LJ8RKRc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gqj-om-_Acc&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=spain%2Bmuslims

Watch some of the above about muslims.
You shouldnt remain in your state , you owe it to yourself and your loved ones , protect yourself from a day where the only protection will be for the believers in the one God. The natural inclination is to know you do good there is a reward you do bad there is a punishment.

Now kindly leave this thread for Morbius , Thanks

morbius
4th February 2007, 01:27 AM
don't you think that it's important to bring up facts in an intellectual debate? probabilities do not mean anything here. until YOU have proof of what you're saying its better to bring it up, otherwise you're just making a fool out of yourself.
I have to post my comments to knowrass and Jake before continuing, but I’d rather not go deeper into arguing with them before I get a chance to answer fully to abu anas.

don't you think that it's important to bring up facts in an intellectual debate? probabilities do not mean anything here. until YOU have proof of what you're saying its better to bring it up, otherwise you're just making a fool out of yourself.
I brought up those things in response to Muslim claims that Muhamed couldn’t possibly write Quran the way he did because he was illiterate. You guys wave that statement around like it is some great proof of Quran’s divine origin. But in reality it proves nothing. Muhamed was a man of the world, he could have been in touch many scholars and artists because he traveled a lot.

since you supposedly speak arabic so well, please tell us about the wrong biblical names in the qur'aan? ...or would you like to admit that you rely on english translations?!
Isa instead of Yahshua
http://www.scatteredsheep.com/missing-j.htm
Musa instead of Moshe
http://home-3.tiscali.nl/~meester7/engmoses.html

Ibrahim instead of Avraham, Noh instead of Noah, list goes on and on…
Even Allah probably comes from Aramaic “Alaha” which means “God”.


It is perhaps time to evolve!
It is definitely time to evolve, but those things do not happen over night. Remember that a society is a stubborn mule, not a racing horse. You force it to run faster that it wants and it will throw you off.

1. We have more or less destroyed the environment beyond a point of repair.

2.We are unravelling nature's genetic codes without having a clue how to weave the original patterns back if we find we need to do so.

3. We are at war with many other countries and have the capacity to annihilate all life on this planet.

Would you would trust this level of knowledge to people who lack the necessary innate morality to deal with the responsibilities it brings ?
You said it right. Good life and lost touch with nature have influenced a lot of our people in the negative way. But I very much doubt that there is a universal solution to this problem. And even more I doubt that rigid and intolerant path of Islam is the answer we’re looking for.

morbius
4th February 2007, 05:02 PM
Fourth issue:
My Response: Once again, thank you. You are showing us that Yahweh (The God of the Old Testament, whom you say is: Jesus, The Father, The Holy Spirit) stole his ideas from his creation.
I have no idea what you meant by this, so I can’t comment.

This must also mean that Paul is a lier, since he said in: 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
I do think that Christian scriptures were inspired by God. However, there are naturally mistakes in them, since they are written by humans. As you can see for yourself, Paul said that they are open for correction.
Catholics for a while had a doctrine that Catholic Church can not be wrong, but they gave it up eventually.

Fifth issue:
The trinity teaches that Jesus is God, the Father is God, the Holy spirit is God. Jesus is NOT the father, nor is he the holy spirit. The Father is NOT Jesus, nor is he the holy spirit. The Holy Spirit is NOT the father, nor is he Jesus. They are CO-EQUAL, CO-EXIST, but they are THREE DISTINCT PERSONS. Yet for some weird reason, 1+1+1=1 for millions and millions of christians.
You Muslims always have a problem with this. I can’t blame you since I don’t understand it well myself. Simply I do not know exact nature of God, because He had no desire to revile it to us.

I do not think that it is impossible that God has more than just one layer. What would you say about Hindu beliefs that teach that there are numerous gods, but that they are all just different manifestations of One God?

Perhaps this answer will suffice you:
When the Irish Celts asked Saint Patrick how come God can be one and three at the same time, he showed them a leaf of clover, which was one leaf and three leafs in the same time. That’s how he converted them and that’s how clover became symbol of Ireland. True story.

Sixth issue:
My Response: The oldest bones of modern-like humans are only about 200 000 years old!?!? How can this be!? Morbius, I'm sorry to tell you this, but your holy book teaches that the earth is somewhat 6500 years old. You reach somewhere around 6500 years when you count the period of Adam to Jesus.
There is simply a lot of bull in the Old Testament. All religious books have some of that. People who wright them are of flesh and blood, they make mistakes usually by assuming things, excepting earlier beliefs or by interpreting things wrong.

abu anas
11th February 2007, 02:20 AM
Response coming soon in a couple of days insha'Allah.

ibn 'abd al-jabbaar
11th February 2007, 12:55 PM
Isa instead of Yahshua
http://www.scatteredsheep.com/missing-j.htm
Musa instead of Moshe
http://home-3.tiscali.nl/~meester7/engmoses.html

Ibrahim instead of Avraham, Noh instead of Noah, list goes on and on…
Even Allah probably comes from Aramaic “Alaha” which means “God”.


hebrew != arabic. yet again, you display to everyone here your utter ignorance in semitic languages. can you explain why you feign competence on such subjects?

all but two of the examples you provided are laughably redundant, and the links provided substantiate your ignorance rather than your claim.

the etymology of the arabic `Isa has a variety of routes proposed by academics tracing back to the hebrew Yeshua`.

the most widely accepted etymology for Allah by academics is the arabic "al-Ilah", Alaha from the aramaic is not considered as likely. the problem is that you already know this, but almost at every turn you behave as an intellectually dishonest pretender. you don't seem interested in discerning 'truth', you simply want to espouse polemic on topics you know almost nothing of.

abu khattab
11th February 2007, 07:07 PM
*Yawns*

Reply to morphous:

Did Jesus spoke english or aramic? Is aramic sister language to english or arabic?

Noah in aramic is same to noah in arabic. Noh in english is different to both aramic and arabic....get your facts right!

also....your stupidy about Muhammed "asking" someone to write the stories from OT! so did he asked "non-belivers" to write them!

Also, go and learn arabic to understand the verse and importance of it "an illetrate prophet"... a man to come up with a gi-gantic book like quran, the grammer, the composition of verses..its beauty, the vowls....u have to be a "donkey" to miss that!

morbius
12th February 2007, 12:07 PM
Did Jesus spoke english or aramic? Is aramic sister language to english or arabic?

Noah in aramic is same to noah in arabic. Noh in english is different to both aramic and arabic....get your facts right!

My point is: if Quran was narated to Muhamed by God, then why wouldn’t God use original Jewish names, but instead the slightly changed Arabic versions?
One explanation could be that Arabs already accepted those names as such and God didn’t want to confuse them. But then, people here claim that Arabs knew nothing about what is said in the Bible, because they were primitive and there were no Bible translations into Arabic. So, God could have used the original names, it would make no difference.
More simple explanation would have been that those names have been told to Muhamed by scholars, but he didn’t remember them correctly.

Also, go and learn arabic to understand the verse and importance of it "an illetrate prophet"... a man to come up with a gi-gantic book like quran, the grammer, the composition of verses..its beauty, the vowls....u have to be a "donkey" to miss that!
Then how do you explain that William Shakespeare, a man without almost any education whatsoever, managed to write some of the most beautiful plays ever? When he came to London in his late twenties he was barely literate, and yet just a few years later he wrote some incredible work. He wrote “Romeo and Juliet” in just two weeks and without a single grammatical or spelling mistake in it! Beauty of his verses is exceptional, and his delicate depiction of various psychological states was centuries ahead of his time.

morbius
12th February 2007, 12:10 PM
Response coming soon in a couple of days insha'Allah.
Hopefuly, I'll be able to write the rest of my reply to you soon. I simply am short on time.