Salahudin
26th April 2007, 09:14 PM
Dardashat
1- The current events in Iraq have been coming thick and fast lately in a manner confirming that America has succeeded in achieving a major infiltration within the ranks of the resistance she could never have dreamt of. The Brigades of the Revolution of the Twenty have split up and the Iraqi Hamas Movement has been established; this was followed by a fatwa from Sheik Hamed al-Ali regarding the “Islamic State of Iraq” and by the announcement that the Iraqi Scholars Council was established; and finally, the Islamic Army issued a communiqué in which they responded to the speeches of al-Baghdadi and listed against al-Qaeeda a host of accusations of killing, terrorising, violating property and sowing animosity among other resistance groups.
America has come to realise that after her withdrawal from the cities of Iraq, matters on the ground would only be in her hands if there were a loyal secular government that replaces her. However, because the circumstances at present are not proceeding in this direction, she would for the time being accept a central government that is nationalistic and non-sectarian in its orientation; this government would include several representatives who are close to the various resistance movements, in addition to forming the nucleus of a regional Sunni government with an Islamic tinge and a nationalist orientation. It seems that the Islamic Army, the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq and the Iraqi Hamas, which is the military wing of the Islamic Party, have all agreed to proceed with America in this direction. As for the issue of a withdrawal timetable and the recognition of the resistance, which represent the two prerequisites for entering into negotiations with America, this does not pose an obstacle for America when the military and political conditions become in her favour as she begins her withdrawal and establish a Sunni regional government with an Islamic flavour, which the omens of its backing with funds and weapons have began to take shape, especially that the Arab states have recognised the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq; some Arab states have in fact hosted the Secretary General Dr Hareth al-Dari and the Media coordinator Dr Muthanna Hareth al-Dari.
With a conspicuous American backing, Aljazeera satellite channel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Jordan have played a major role in embracing the Iraqi resistance men who adopt the nationalist approach in terms of liberation and the departure of the occupier. The Head of the Cultural and Media Committee in the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq Dr Muthanna Hareth al-Dari revealed during a conference in the Jordanian capital Amman that efforts were made to formulate a unified project that would be approved by the Iraqi resistance. Dr Muthanna mentioned the official Arab states’ recognition of the Committee and their cooperation with it; he also stressed the important position of the Committee and its leading role among the forces resisting the occupation in Iraq. He added that “The importance did not emanate from the Sunni aspect of the Committee, but from the national framework it supported.” It is in this context that the statement made by a Saudi official about backing the resistance should be perceived; also, king Abdullah described during the Arab Summit the American presence as occupation.
As Muthanna al-Dari was holding a press conference in Amman about the unified project for the Iraqi resistance, a number of political and tribal personalities Basra, Thi Qar and Misan announced during a conference they held in Baghdad the formation of the “interim government of the Southern Province” to be headed by Abdul Razzaq al-Saidi.
The “resistance” who will negotiate with America is in fact the various factions that the media spokesperson of the Islamic Army Ibrahim al-Shummari mentioned during Aljazeera’s programme “Without Frontiers”. These are the Islamic Army, the Mujahideen Army, the Brigades of the Revolution of the Twenty, the Jami’ Brigades and al-Rashideen Army, through there are other groups such as al-Qaeeda organisation and Ansar al-Sunnah, who is renowned for its spectacular operations and who has a sizeable dominance and presence in the northern areas. This recognition by al-Shummari of these fighting groups to the exclusion of the others acts as a prelude to negotiating with them in order to explore the conditions of the American withdrawal and what America may gain in exchange for announcing her withdrawal from Iraq; specifically, recognising the provinces (states) that will be established inside Iraq, giving America long-term oil contracts and permanent military bases and not working towards establishing an Islamic Khilafah.
As for the fate of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq, which is facing a media onslaught in addition to a number of skirmishes with other armed factions, America will exploit the “Sunni-Sunni” rift in the same way she exploited the “Sunni-Shia” rift to end the project of that state and swap it for a regional government with an Islamic inclination, which will satisfy most of the parties set to back an agreement which will end the internal Sunni fragmentation and inter-fighting and will stand up to the sectarian cleansing and will adopt the aspirations of the Sunni regions.
What is sad is that some Muslims do not learn from recent history nor from past history, and in Iraq itself. Are those about to embark in negotiations with America going to be more faithful and more loyal to America than Saddam Hussein or the Ba’ath party in serving the American plans? And Yet, when America decided to get rid of him, she did not bat an eyelid, nor did she take his past services over thirty years into account and she threw him in the dustbin of history. Allah (swt) says: “Satan makes them promises, and creates in them false desires; but Satan’s promises are nothing but deception.” [T.M.Q.]
1- The current events in Iraq have been coming thick and fast lately in a manner confirming that America has succeeded in achieving a major infiltration within the ranks of the resistance she could never have dreamt of. The Brigades of the Revolution of the Twenty have split up and the Iraqi Hamas Movement has been established; this was followed by a fatwa from Sheik Hamed al-Ali regarding the “Islamic State of Iraq” and by the announcement that the Iraqi Scholars Council was established; and finally, the Islamic Army issued a communiqué in which they responded to the speeches of al-Baghdadi and listed against al-Qaeeda a host of accusations of killing, terrorising, violating property and sowing animosity among other resistance groups.
America has come to realise that after her withdrawal from the cities of Iraq, matters on the ground would only be in her hands if there were a loyal secular government that replaces her. However, because the circumstances at present are not proceeding in this direction, she would for the time being accept a central government that is nationalistic and non-sectarian in its orientation; this government would include several representatives who are close to the various resistance movements, in addition to forming the nucleus of a regional Sunni government with an Islamic tinge and a nationalist orientation. It seems that the Islamic Army, the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq and the Iraqi Hamas, which is the military wing of the Islamic Party, have all agreed to proceed with America in this direction. As for the issue of a withdrawal timetable and the recognition of the resistance, which represent the two prerequisites for entering into negotiations with America, this does not pose an obstacle for America when the military and political conditions become in her favour as she begins her withdrawal and establish a Sunni regional government with an Islamic flavour, which the omens of its backing with funds and weapons have began to take shape, especially that the Arab states have recognised the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq; some Arab states have in fact hosted the Secretary General Dr Hareth al-Dari and the Media coordinator Dr Muthanna Hareth al-Dari.
With a conspicuous American backing, Aljazeera satellite channel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Jordan have played a major role in embracing the Iraqi resistance men who adopt the nationalist approach in terms of liberation and the departure of the occupier. The Head of the Cultural and Media Committee in the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq Dr Muthanna Hareth al-Dari revealed during a conference in the Jordanian capital Amman that efforts were made to formulate a unified project that would be approved by the Iraqi resistance. Dr Muthanna mentioned the official Arab states’ recognition of the Committee and their cooperation with it; he also stressed the important position of the Committee and its leading role among the forces resisting the occupation in Iraq. He added that “The importance did not emanate from the Sunni aspect of the Committee, but from the national framework it supported.” It is in this context that the statement made by a Saudi official about backing the resistance should be perceived; also, king Abdullah described during the Arab Summit the American presence as occupation.
As Muthanna al-Dari was holding a press conference in Amman about the unified project for the Iraqi resistance, a number of political and tribal personalities Basra, Thi Qar and Misan announced during a conference they held in Baghdad the formation of the “interim government of the Southern Province” to be headed by Abdul Razzaq al-Saidi.
The “resistance” who will negotiate with America is in fact the various factions that the media spokesperson of the Islamic Army Ibrahim al-Shummari mentioned during Aljazeera’s programme “Without Frontiers”. These are the Islamic Army, the Mujahideen Army, the Brigades of the Revolution of the Twenty, the Jami’ Brigades and al-Rashideen Army, through there are other groups such as al-Qaeeda organisation and Ansar al-Sunnah, who is renowned for its spectacular operations and who has a sizeable dominance and presence in the northern areas. This recognition by al-Shummari of these fighting groups to the exclusion of the others acts as a prelude to negotiating with them in order to explore the conditions of the American withdrawal and what America may gain in exchange for announcing her withdrawal from Iraq; specifically, recognising the provinces (states) that will be established inside Iraq, giving America long-term oil contracts and permanent military bases and not working towards establishing an Islamic Khilafah.
As for the fate of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq, which is facing a media onslaught in addition to a number of skirmishes with other armed factions, America will exploit the “Sunni-Sunni” rift in the same way she exploited the “Sunni-Shia” rift to end the project of that state and swap it for a regional government with an Islamic inclination, which will satisfy most of the parties set to back an agreement which will end the internal Sunni fragmentation and inter-fighting and will stand up to the sectarian cleansing and will adopt the aspirations of the Sunni regions.
What is sad is that some Muslims do not learn from recent history nor from past history, and in Iraq itself. Are those about to embark in negotiations with America going to be more faithful and more loyal to America than Saddam Hussein or the Ba’ath party in serving the American plans? And Yet, when America decided to get rid of him, she did not bat an eyelid, nor did she take his past services over thirty years into account and she threw him in the dustbin of history. Allah (swt) says: “Satan makes them promises, and creates in them false desires; but Satan’s promises are nothing but deception.” [T.M.Q.]