Comments: Moderate Islam or Effective Subservience

[Anonymous]

so called leaders in the west deliberately describe Islam as a religion of peace so to sat muslims up for lander and attack when infiltrators/agents commit terrorist acts and then blame muslims. Everyone can then turn around and say 'see, what a load of rubbish, islam is not a religion of peace, it is a religion of violence and terror'. Get the picture? Islam promotes peace ut it also fights injustice and oppression. They convieniently gorget t mention this part.</p>

[Anonymous]

I will pass this sight onto non-muslims and muslims alike because I appreciate it's message. The way Islam is defined in the preceding passage seems absolute and just, as a religion should be. It is too bad that my government has, for*******economic reasons, invaded a country and now hides behind their false*******intentions of freeing an enslaved Iraqi sub-population. We are forcing people of Islamic faith to feel like their hands are being forced to protect themselves from oppression.</p>

[Anonymous]

The US waged war against Saddam Hussein - not islam. Muslims are trying to turn it into a 'holy war', not the*******US. Perhaps the US had bad intelligence; this intelligence was shared by many nations, not just US. </p>

Who are the suicide bombers? I think maybe Muslims? Yes. Who do they mostly kill? I think maybe other Muslims? Yes. Keep preaching your misguided message and continue to blow each other up. The recent*******bombings*******by al qaeda in Jordan and the subsequent backlash by Jordanians against al qaeda*******only further give evidence that muslims who try to turn this into a war of religion are fools. This is why killing each other in the name of islam is and will continue to fail.</p>

[Mansoor Ali]

The US waged war against Saddam Hussein - not islam. </p>

It is obvious that the*******invasion of Iraq by U.S. forces is being carried out in the interests of Israel. U.S. soldiers are dying for Israel.</p>

Who are the suicide bombers? I think maybe Muslims? Yes. Who do they mostly kill? I think maybe other Muslims? Yes</p>

Iraqi police recently caught two terrorists with a car full of explosives. Would it surprise you to learn they were British Special Forces disguised as Arabs?
A car driving through the outskirts of a besieged city opens fire on a police checkpoint, killing one. In pursuit, the police surround and detain the drivers and find the vehicle packed with explosives – perhaps part of an insurgent's plan to destroy lives. </p>

Sadly, this story is really not all that surprising, after hearing countless accounts of using napalm and torture against innocent civilians in addition to the other daily abuses dished out by American overseers.</p>

There have been a number of insurgent bombings in Iraq recently. Who really is responsible for the bloodshed and destruction? The only tangible benefit of the bombings is justification for Coalition forces continuing its presence in Iraq. Who benefits from that? Certainly not the Iraqis – they already believe most*******bombings are done by the United States to prompt religious war. </p>

If you thought the U.S. wouldn't blow up people it claims to support in the hopes of advancing its agenda, think again. </p>

--- M. hutaff(slightly edited)</p>