Muhammad Al-Saffarini (d. 1188)
This is a discussion on Muhammad Al-Saffarini (d. 1188) within the Orthodox Theology (Aqeeda) forums, part of the Learning Zone category; what do the books of tabaqa say about Imaam as-safarini(rh) and his 'aqeedah? Well, this is the point. The books ...
- 29th July 2006 #11
Well, this is the point. The books of tabaqat do not suggest anything with respect to tafweedh and al-saffrini, the way they do not suggest anything with respect to affirming the literal meanings and Ibn Taymiyya.what do the books of tabaqa say about Imaam as-safarini(rh) and his 'aqeedah?
Why? Because as far as the Hanbalis are concerned, there is no difference between Ibn Taymiyya and any other Hanbali with respect to the issue of Names and Attributes.
Yes, when there comes a Hanbali who differed with the mainstream Hanbalis, such as Ibn 'Aqil and Ibn al-Jawzi, the books on tabaqat do make note of it. This is why, shouldn't it make a person wonder, why Ibn al-Jawzi is censured for his views on Sifat - in the very books of tabaqat, while there is a deafening silence on Ibn Taymiyya?
If he hasn't studied any Hanbali work on creed (and perhaps even fiqh), on what basis does he claim to be a Hanbali.I believe he himself mentioned that he hasnt studied any of the major book sof the true hanaabila on the sufi forums, and hasnt made his presence since. he mentioned he followed the aqeedah of the asharee influence/sympathizing RizqAllah family from amongst the hanaabilah.
Guess what? I can be a chemist, too. I know I have never studied pharmacy. But there you go! I am chemist!
As for his sympathies with 'Rizq Allah family', then as mentioned earlier, he does not know what he is talking about.
There is no such thing as 'Rizq Allah family'. There is the Tamimi family, and RizqAllah al-Tamimi was only a member of that family.
Not to mention that even Rizq Allah and the entire Tamimi family in bulk are grossly anthropomorphists according to his Ash'arite standard. And he could only know this if he had even read the work by Abul-Fadhl al-Tamimi in beliefs.
But this is the 21st century 'traditionalism'. Just brag about the ijazas on one hand, and on the other, pretend to be a Hanbali spokesman, and dupe the masses by writing a humiliating 'Oranges and Apples', without having read - let alone traditionally studied - a single book on creed.
If you ask me, this isn't a sign of a person with a healthy heart.
wasalamA person who never made a mistake never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein
Similar Threads
-
Can we say Sayyidina Muhammad SAW
By asharee_salafi in forum Fiqh and its ApplicationReplies: 11Last Post: 9th September 2008, 01:43 PM -
Sh. Muhammad Ash-Shareef: Anyone have a pic of him?
By JayshAllah in forum Islam in GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: 9th October 2007, 04:46 AM -
Muhammad Sword
By Rehmat in forum Islam in GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: 21st September 2007, 02:41 PM -
Sh. Muhammad Mohar Ali passes away
By Expergefactionist in forum Islam in GeneralReplies: 18Last Post: 15th May 2007, 03:50 PM -
Muhammad Ibn Ahmad al-Salim
By abu_ibrahim in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 5Last Post: 4th March 2007, 04:44 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote
Bookmarks