Results 1 to 3 of 3

ruling with man made laws

This is a discussion on ruling with man made laws within the Beliefs and Fundamentals forums, part of the Main Topics category; salamu alaikum there is one thing that im still confused about i hope someone can help me with it. with ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    157

    Default ruling with man made laws

    salamu alaikum

    there is one thing that im still confused about i hope someone can help me with it. with proofs inshallah

    the thing is, making laws in itself is not a kufr. there isnt proof that making laws in itself is a kufr becuz if it would be kufr then making laws that are allowed (like rulings about spotlights etc) would also be haram.

    so if a person makes a law that contains haram( like riba etc) then this law would be considered haram and not a kufr just like we see above that a law can also be allowed like in the case of making laws for spotlights etc.

    if i would make a law that contains shirk then this law inevitably be a kufr. becuz in this case i allow shirk.

    for deeds that are haram to become a kufr it needs istihlal. just like when a person makes laws that are haram he needs to make it halal before we can call him a kafeer.

    becuz like i said: there is no proof that making laws in itself is a kufr. so by making laws that contain haram this law(by itself) will be haram also.

    becuz ruling the people with laws that contain some haram is the same as parenting the childeren with rules that contain haram. if he does it out of hawa this is not kufr.

    so now comes the question: why do some of the ulamah believe that making a general law to rule the public by witch contains the foribidden(like riba etc) to be a kufr?
    im wondering if these ulamah ever consider this kufr. isnt it posible that they consider the actions of some of our leaders in our time to be kufr becuz they mixed different laws of different religions into 1 law? by this they are calling the people to other religions? and this is why they think its a major kufr?



    am i right? who can help me with this issue?

    proofs please.

  2. #2
    WAHHAABI NOT JADEEDI Aboo Shayba's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    "Toilet - surrounded by land mines" - Abu Hamza Al-Masri
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,591
    Add Aboo Shayba on Facebook Add Aboo Shayba on Google+

    Default Re: ruling with man made laws

    Quote Originally Posted by ummi salam View Post
    salamu alaikum

    there is one thing that im still confused about i hope someone can help me with it. with proofs inshallah

    the thing is, making laws in itself is not a kufr. there isnt proof that making laws in itself is a kufr becuz if it would be kufr then making laws that are allowed (like rulings about spotlights etc) would also be haram.


    so if a person makes a law that contains haram( like riba etc) then this law would be considered haram and not a kufr just like we see above that a law can also be allowed like in the case of making laws for spotlights etc.

    if i would make a law that contains shirk then this law inevitably be a kufr. becuz in this case i allow shirk.

    for deeds that are haram to become a kufr it needs istihlal. just like when a person makes laws that are haram he needs to make it halal before we can call him a kafeer.

    becuz like i said: there is no proof that making laws in itself is a kufr. so by making laws that contain haram this law(by itself) will be haram also.

    becuz ruling the people with laws that contain some haram is the same as parenting the childeren with rules that contain haram. if he does it out of hawa this is not kufr.

    so now comes the question: why do some of the ulamah believe that making a general law to rule the public by witch contains the foribidden(like riba etc) to be a kufr?
    im wondering if these ulamah ever consider this kufr. isnt it posible that they consider the actions of some of our leaders in our time to be kufr becuz they mixed different laws of different religions into 1 law? by this they are calling the people to other religions? and this is why they think its a major kufr?




    am i right? who can help me with this issue?

    proofs please.
    If nobody else beats me to it, by the end of the day i'll post the adilla for it.
    May Allaah free our shaykh Aboo Muhammad Al-Maqdisee

    The Martyrs of Islaam are not dead, but they are Alive in the Hearts of Green Birds





    For if upon Allah you do rely,
    The intrigues of his slaves can bring no pains.

    Syed Qutb (May Allaah accept him)

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: ruling with man made laws

    np inshallah

Similar Threads

  1. Shari'ah Applied Only in Absence of Man-Made Laws
    By Ibn al-Iskandar in forum Politics, Jihad and Current Affairs
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22nd November 2010, 03:03 PM
  2. Yasir Qadhi | Gods Law and Man-Made Laws: Muslims Living in Secular Democracies
    By Sharif in forum Politics, Jihad and Current Affairs
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 14th July 2010, 12:56 AM
  3. Important RULING BY MAN-MADE-LAWs: FINAL JUDGEMENT!
    By Saiful Rahman Al Afghany in forum Islam in General
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 7th August 2009, 11:47 AM
  4. Ruling on teaching man-made laws
    By FOS in forum Fiqh and its Application
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14th June 2009, 05:51 PM
  5. Those whole rule by man-made laws.
    By Abu Idris Al-Albani in forum Islam in General
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 5th July 2008, 03:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38