Iran "elections": lessons for those who STILL think that we can win "democratically"

[Abu Abdallah al-Bulghari]

Shooting reported at mostly peaceful Moussavi protest rally - CNN.com

If somebody, even after Algeria, even after Turkey, even after Hamas, even after every single time people choose shari'a over stinking man-made crap, even after all those numerous lessons of history, still thinks that we should try (together with idiots from MAS and other ikhwani boneheads) political process, elections in Iran bring yet another lesson: no matter how you win, if US does not like you, they will stage, they will organize, they will pay for, they will instigate an "orange" or some other kind of tutty-frutty "revolution" that will provide yet another basis for interference from the West.

That's the lesson from Ahmadinejad's victory.

[drkjke]

democarcy is against islam.islam only recognises allahs rule not mens rule
we need khilafat .till true muslim khalafat is established muslims will remain under slavery

[AIPAC Spy]

...if US does not like you, they will stage, they will organize, they will pay for, they will instigate an "orange" or some other kind of tutty-frutty "revolution" that will provide yet another basis for interference from the West.

_

Ahmadinejad's re-election was the best thing that could have happened.

Now the Zio-Americans are weeping and gnashing their teeth.

Moussavi is acting like a sore loser.

Hail Ahmadinejad!__

_

[Muneer88]

I don't know what lessons is to be learnt from this particular one, on one side hardcore rafidi (Ahmadinejad) and o the other side a secular , still rafidi (Moussavi )
Ahl Sunnah are standing on the sidelines watching this and for them there's little change, they still have not a single masjid in Teheran

[Abu Abdallah al-Bulghari]

I don't know what lessons is to be learnt from this particular one, on one side hardcore rafidi (Ahmadinejad) and o the other side a secular , still rafidi (Moussavi )
Ahl Sunnah are standing on the sidelines watching this and for them there's little change, they still have not a single masjid in Teheran

It does not matter in this case who one. What matters is that the results won't be recognized if they make Zionists and US unhappy. I could have added to this numerous coup-d-etats in Latin America (starting with 9/11, 1973 in Chile).

We know that democracy is Kufr, but this is the argument for those who are sincerely in the dark on this subject.

[AIPAC Spy]

...if US does not like you, they will stage, they will organize, they will pay for, they will instigate an "orange" or some other kind of tutty-frutty "revolution" that will provide yet another basis for interference from the West.

This video is a masterpiece.

I urge everyone to watch it.

CIA, Iran and the Election Riots:

Hail Ahmadinejad!

[AIPAC Spy]

_

Obama Moves to Fund Iranian Dissidents

Despite Claims of Not Meddling, US to Send $20 Million to Opposition

by Jason Ditz

June 26, 2009

Despite President Barack Obama’s persistent claims that the United States is
not meddling in the post-election furore in Iran, the administration is moving
forward with plans to subsidize Iranian dissident groups to the tune of $20
million in the form of USAID grants.

_

[AIPAC Spy]

_

Demonising Iran conveniently hides uncomfortable truths for the West

by Robin Yassin-Kassab

[snip]

Even Israel's Mossad chief Meir Dagan reported that there were no more
irregularities in the Iranian vote than in elections in liberal democracies.

[snip]

Here's the nub of it. Iran opposes the US military presence in the region, and
vigorously supports resistance to Israeli expansionism. On these two points,
the Iranian regime is closer than any other to the true sentiments of Middle
Easterners.

And this, fundamentally, is why Iran is imagined to be such a problem in the
West: because it's a Venezuela or a Cuba of a country. Iran is troublesome
not because it's any more obscurantist or dictatorial than its neighbours, but
because it is less submissive.

The world worries about Iran's nuclear energy programme while keeping quiet
about Israel's 200 nuclear weapons. Israel occupies Syrian, Lebanese and
Palestinian territory. Iran has not attacked another country in its modern
history.

Iran is accused of backing terrorism because it helps to arm Hizbullah and
Hamas, grassroots anti-occupation groups with a legitimate, even legal,
cause. Both groups have targeted civilians (rarely, in Hizbullah's case) but
not on as grand a scale as Israel, which is armed and funded by the United
States. And Iran doesn't export Wahhabi-nihilist terrorists of the Taliban or
al-Qaeda-in-Iraq variety. Again, that would be our ally Saudi Arabia.



_

[AIPAC Spy]

_

Galloway stirs up a new storm with TV defence of regime

by Martin Williams

[snip]

George Galloway appeared on Iranian television backing the regime of
President Ahmadinejad and blaming the BBC for helping foment unrest in
Tehran.

[snip]

Galloway said: "In the end the opposition was defeated and there was a lot
of disappointment about that amongst the Iranians and especially amongst
western commentators, and you can work out why.

"Why they hate the Islamic republic of Iran, why they hate President
Ahmadinejad.

"It's not for any bad things he has done or any mistakes ... it's because Iran
will not bow the knee to western power. Because Iran will not bow the knee
to the Zionist settler state of Israel which is an apartheid state, I remind
you.

"That's why they hate Ahamdinejad."

_

[Frederiksen78]

democarcy is against islam.islam only recognises allahs rule not mens rule
we need khilafat .till true muslim khalafat is established muslims will remain under slavery

It still requires human beings to rule according to Islam, right? Once in power, what is to stop these men from abusing their position?