Results 1 to 3 of 3

The Israeli Lobby and US/UK Foreign Policy towards Israel

This is a discussion on The Israeli Lobby and US/UK Foreign Policy towards Israel within the Global Affairs forums, part of the Main Topics category; Before I left the BNP for Islam I wrote, under a pseudonym, some articles on Jewish Supremacism in the UK ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member AkramUKConv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default The Israeli Lobby and US/UK Foreign Policy towards Israel

    Before I left the BNP for Islam I wrote, under a pseudonym, some articles on Jewish Supremacism in the UK (two articles below). Although I have nothing ot do with the White nationalism now, I still strongly believe in the pro-Israeli stance of the US/UK governments. I still believe in 'No War for Israel' (articleand another).

    I hope you find this of interest... I do not have anything to do with Nazi's or Racists, I only support Dr. David Ernest Duke Ph.D. and I urge you, as Muslims, to get his book. He is welcomes in Syria, watch the video!

    Lies and Deceit Brought the UK Under Zionist Control (another copy)

    Jewish Power in the UK

    Documentary on the Israeli lobby

    MUST READ: Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Ernest Duke, Ph.D. (PDF Copy) (2003 preface (2007 preface)) Duke went to the Iranian Holocaust Conference and is friends with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. DON'T believe Zionist media lies about Dr. David Duke!

    READ or WATCH THIS: Dr. Duke Indicts Zionist Policies Delivers Withering Cannonade

    America’s Biggest Threat

    The Jewish Question

    No More Jewish Wars for Israel

    BUY this book! Quite simply, no-one is better at exposing Zionist Supremacism than Dr. David Duke

    I do not have anything to do with Nazi's or Racists, I only support Dr. David Ernest Duke Ph.D. and I urge you, as Muslims, to get his book

    Last edited by AkramUKConv; 18th July 2007 at 08:12 AM.
    Download videos: KEEPVID.

    "... the war on Islamic fascism is less about fighting terrorism and more about silencing those who dissent from the West's endless wars against the Middle East..." - Journalist Jonathan Cook

    Boycott Israeli Goods / Israel / both

  2. #2
    'Amal Ahl al-Madina Suhaib Jobst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006


    White nationalism and opposition to Zionism are quite different things. I must commend you on your articles, which were well-written. Although I never subscribed to the racial theories, I used to collaborate with Neo-Nazis, in my mistaken manner of believing the interests of Islam were being served. My duties extended to nothing more than writing messages on their forum, which frequently criticized their racial beliefs. I thought of myself as an "Aryan" Muslim.

    Now, my identity is a Muslim whose allegiance is based on that. I have an ethnic identity which I remain proud of, but this is not the basis of my allegiance nor do I consider others "inferior" or "superior", except on an individual basis, how they conduct themselves and their Taqwa. (For more details on these past activities, see elsewhere on this forum:

    I have long since abandoned any thought of cooperating with Neo-Nazis and here was the last message I sent to the relevant group (I post for the relevance it has for the topic and any lingering doubts one may have about me, given the slander which remains on the Umar Lee blog):

    O you callers to Jahiliyyah!

    Perhaps I was mistaken concerning the religious policy of the Aryan Nations, but nevertheless my statements ring true. Like most Jews, you have adopted ideas of racial supremacy, which are dishonorable contrary to your alleged honor code. With the same fervor of the Jewish scriptures, you despise those who do not belong to the "Aryan" race. Your rhetoric about "non-White mongrel hordes" is clearly parallel to the Talmudic hatred of the "goyim."

    Your concept of an "Aryan race" is vague and abstract. The term originated from a Sanskrit word which defined not a particular race, but "noble man". Our Indo-European ancestors never used terms such as "white" and "Aryan" to describe themselves. They looked to their own tribal identity, expressed through their organic culture and the soil from which they were raised.

    It is not congruent with the race of the spirit, that is, expressive of a common linguistic and cultural heritage. Terms such as "Aryan" are insufficient to both our spiritual and cultural needs. It represents blood without spirit, devoid of any value. The term includes too many incongruous elements of vastly different religious, cultural, and ancestral backgrounds.

    As shown by the type of individuals who dominate your organization and forum, "Aryan" attracts those who are ignorant of their true identity and attempt to make up for the loss of a real culture, in the midst of social decline. The ignorance of those who gravitate here - exhibited by their simplistic comments and atrocious grammatical errors - are exhibited of those who try to mould for themselves an artificial sense of identity, in post-industrial society.

    At the same time you speak of this alleged "Aryan" race, it is obvious the majority of those whom you describe in this manner, do not even share the same legacy! Who actually considers themselves "Aryan" except your ilk? The very term has no fact in reality, but only in the confused minds of you who have no identity.

    The amount of one's "Aryan" blood is merely a social construct of the modernist era, which arose when certain groups of Europeans gained privilege over others. It has not the least appeal for those who possess a clear sense of identity. It appeals to the simple instincts of those who do not have an identity, who are paranoid of losing any of their privileges and are utterly ignorant of the true nature of current affairs and about other cultures. Why is it, those who are loudest in ranting about their "racial supremacy", are always the most ignorant?

    Rather, it is designed for those who have lost their ethnic and cultural identity, products of societies which have undergone the stages of decadence and have adopted a materialist outlook, whether that is based on biology or economics. For example, you constantly attack immigrants solely because they are non-White, but ignore the economic and social causes of such immigration, namely the exploitive and cheap labor of the Global Capitalist system. But your fanatical race-hatred makes you blind to all these facts.

    Given the above statements, your ideology shows the inherent faults and weaknesses of false man-made laws of the Kuffar. Your ideology is not one which I seek to cooperate with, as I reject all ways of 'Asabiyyah or indeed any ideologies of the Tawagheet. Correctly understood, 'Asabiyyah means to make one's allegiance based on boundaries and standards which derive from other than Allah (Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala), particularly in one's profane desires and whims.

    The Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said: "He is not one of us who calls for 'asabiyyah, or who fights for 'asabiyyah, or who dies for 'asabiyyah." (Abu Dawud, no. 4456).

    Even your own attachment to "honor" is mere rhetoric. By what stretch of the imagination, can you account for the racism and arrogant hubris which dominates on this forum? How do you consider it honorable to rant about "non-White mongrel hordes" and "dismantling" the Islamic and Christian houses of worship in America?

    "They (the Disbelievers) were plotting, and Allah too was plotting; and Allah is the Best of those who plot." [8:30]

    It is clear, the anti-Islamic rhetoric of the forum members reflects the sentiments of the leadership all along, whereas like the proverbial wolves in sheep's clothing, they had previously cloaked them. We see individuals attacking Islam based on the same canards used by the Zionist media. We see people attacking Islam based on their own arrogance, thinking their culture is the best and bothering not to even ascertain what Islam actually means in this or that practice.

    "That is because Allah, He is the Truth, and that which they invoke besides Him is Al-Batil (falsehood)." [31:30]

    If there is any opposition to the Zionists and Globalists, it is clearly with the Muslims, those who submit to Allah (Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala) and the perfected Deen. Those whose worldview is one of the Hereafter, not in enthrall to profane desires such as those of 'Asabiyyah or racism.

    "Truth has been distinguished from Falsehood - and those who renounce and denounce Taghut and then believe in Allah have grasped that trustworthy hand-hold that never breaks." [2:256]

    While we Muslims, by our very attachment to a Deen which is radically different from the vision of life spread by the Zionist-Globalist-Crusader alliance, represent a clear threat to their dominance, this is not the case with the Neo-Nazi movements. Your groups are not taken seriously at all by the Zionists or anyone else, except perhaps in your own minds. Your movements take a number of different forms and are subject to constant infiltration by the government.

    "Their enmity among themselves is very great. You would think they were united, but their hearts are divided. That is because they are a people who understand not." [59:14]

    You may be serious in your cause, but you have failed to even gain the allegiance of a sizable minority of Whites. Constrast this with the wide-reaching support of the Mujahideen among the Muslims. Compare your own cause with the willingness of thousands of Muslims to give up everything in the Cause of Allah (Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala) and defending this Deen. We have a cause for which we strive, that defines our allegiance as a loftier goal than the profane taghut of racial hatred.

    The last articles of brother Abdul-Aziz Ibn Myatt (hafidahullah) have been Islamic. He has ceased cooperating with Neo-Nazis, as there is nothing which can benefit our Islamic cause from continued cooperation. Rather than accepting the values of honor which he had espoused in his earlier articles, and examine his latest articles and inquire personally as to what his true beliefs were (and are), you have done the opposite.

    He made efforts to get you all to see things in a very different light, but these efforts obviously proved in vain and you have clearly shown the unbridgeable gulf which exists between we Muslims and you worshipers of tawagheet (false deities), such as race. Here are examples of some of his recent statements, made this year and last year, AFTER the previous efforts on his part:

    "Perhaps I was rather naive, and perhaps I did misunderstand some things regarding Islam and such co-operation: ecause of this, for several months last year I had many discussions with Muslims, who were far more knowledgeable than me in certain matters, and I came to the conclusion, which I stated in an earlier interview, that we Muslims do not need the help or the support of such groups, and that if such people really wanted to fight Zionism, and live in an honourable way, then they should convert to Islam." ("Islam, Honour and Duty," 20 Rajab 1427).

    "If these nationalists, or some of them, desire to aid us, to help us, if they desire to fight the Zionists and the Zionist plan for some kind of world government ruled by Zionists and their Western lackeys, they can do the right thing, the honourable thing, and convert, revert, to Islam - accepting the superiority of Islam over and above each and every way of the West, just as I myself have done." ("An Interview with Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt," 7 Safar 1427).

    "As a Muslim I believe that racism and racialism, and nationalism, are Taghut; idols which are obeyed and believed in over and above Allah Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala. The people who follow such things, who believe in such things, are in Ignorance. They in their ignorance use these things to judge people; to judge themselves; to construct laws, and systems to govern people, as they fight for these things, and thus do they contradict Islam." ("Live Dialogue," 13 Safar 1427/13 March 2006).

    I will conclude this message by recognizing my own efforts in the past proved wrong. I was deceived when I spoke about co-operation, with a group which obviously has ulterior motives and now openly considers Muslims a potential enemy, and where anti-Islamic lies and propaganda dominates the entire discourse.

    "They intend to put out the Light of Allah (i.e, the religion of Islam) with their mouths. But Allah will bring His Light to perfection even though the disbelievers hate it." [61:8]

    I have abandoned such co-operation, repented to Allah (Subhanahu wa-Ta'ala) that I was ever deceived, and made amends to those Muslim brothers online, who rejected my efforts from the very beginning. As Muslims, our ties are based not on race or ethnicity, but if one has submitted to Islam. We are not judged according to our race, but the content of our character.

    "The most honorable of you in the sight of Allah is the one who has At-Taqwa." [49:13]

    I was deceived that Aryan Nations was sincere about co-operation with Muslims, about its alleged honor-code, and your own claims to abandoning racial superiority. The articles in which I provided Islamic "evidences" for such an alliance, were due to a lack of clarity and understanding on my part. It was based on ignorance of the very meaning of Islam, which is despised by proponents of man-made ideologies, who hold rancor against the Muslims and miss not an opportunity to attack this Deen.

    "Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut. So therefore fight against those friends of Shaitaan." [4:76]

    When I uttered the Shahadah, accepting it both in my heart and expressed in my outward actions, it was a statement not only of my own personal belief, but indeed loyalty to the Ummah. That is, I was accepting that Islam would provide the standards by which I judge others, regardless of such taghut considerations as race or tribalism. I love my Muslim brothers and sisters, regardless of their race or ethnicity, just as I hate even those Kuffar who happen to belong to my own race or ethnicity.

    This is the Islamic doctrine of Al-Walaa wal-Baraa, loving and hating individuals based on their stance towards Allah (Azza wa-Jall) and the Deen of Al-Islam, and making one's allegiance based on the firm bonds of Islam and Iman. So how could I cooperate or lend support, in whatever capacity, to a group which attacks my Muslim brothers and sisters, and regards them as enemies? Who seek to make war upon our Islamic communities, here in America?

    I want no part in being used anymore for your own purposes. When I cooperated, the extent of hatred to Islam on the part of the leadership was not clear. I defended cooperation between Muslims and some Neo-Nazis in correspondences with brothers, but they had been right all along while I was terribly mistaken.

    "O you who believe, do not take the kafireen as awliyaa’ instead of the Believers, do you wish to take Allah as a proof against you?” [4:144]

    So I will make the effort now, to express my hatred for your ideology and group, based as it is on Kufr and the ways of tawagheet and hostile as it is to the Muslims. In accordance with the Islamic principles of Al-Walaa wal-Baraa and the fundamentals of Tawheed, I separate myself from this group, forum, and yourselves as individuals.

    "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians (or any other Disbelievers) as Awliya (allies, friends, protectors, helpers), they are the Awliya of each other." [5:51]

    This is my last message. As you have openly expressed your hatred for both Islam and the Muslims, I hate you for the sake of Allah (Azza wa-Jall) and say, with all honesty and sincerity, to me be my beliefs and to you be your beliefs.

    "Say: O Al-Kafirun! I worship not that which you worship, Nor will you worship that which I worship. And I shall not worship that which you are worshipping. Nor will you worship that which I worship. To you be your religion, and to me my religion." [Surah Al-Kafirun, 108]
    Last edited by Suhaib Jobst; 18th July 2007 at 07:52 AM.

  3. #3
    Junior Member AkramUKConv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007


    Watch these:

    Duke welcomed in Syria:

    Duke exposing Zionist control of America: Wolf Blitzer versus David Duke on Israel and Foreign Policy:

    Duke on Jewish Supremacism:

    Blitzer put to shame by Finklestien:

    Is Critisism of Israel Anti-Semitic? Part 1

    Misuse of Anti-semetism and the Abuse of History Part2

    Last edited by AkramUKConv; 19th July 2007 at 08:44 AM.
    Download videos: KEEPVID.

    "... the war on Islamic fascism is less about fighting terrorism and more about silencing those who dissent from the West's endless wars against the Middle East..." - Journalist Jonathan Cook

    Boycott Israeli Goods / Israel / both

Similar Threads

  1. US storm over book on Israel lobby
    By Abandoned-Mind in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th November 2007, 06:36 PM
  2. The Israeli Lobby
    By Daniel in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15th November 2007, 07:10 AM
  3. The Open Secret About the Israel Lobby
    By Daniel in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17th October 2007, 09:20 PM
  4. Ladies and Gentleman, the Israeli Lobby
    By Daniel in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2nd August 2007, 07:09 PM
  5. Questions and Answers about US Foreign Policy
    By Anj in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th December 2004, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49