For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says
This is a discussion on For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says within the Politics, Jihad and Current Affairs forums, part of the Main Topics category; ULYANOVSK, Russia (Reuters) - NATO forces should stay in Afghanistan until they have finished their job to ensure stability, Russian ...
- 2nd August 2012 #1Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 2,146
For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says ULYANOVSK, Russia (Reuters) - NATO forces should stay in Afghanistan until they have finished their job to ensure stability, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday, criticising the planned withdrawal of most combat troops by 2014.
Putin reiterated Kremlin concerns that the pull-out of the U.S.-led alliance, due to start next year, will leave the Central Asian region south of Russia vulnerable to militant violence and drug trafficking.
"It is regrettable that many participants in this operation are thinking about how to pull out of there. They took up this burden and should carry it to the end," Putin said at a meeting with paratroopers in the Russian city of Ulyanovsk.
"If there is no order in Afghanistan it will not be calm on our southern borders. The current (Afghan) leadership will have difficulties keeping the situation under control. NATO member states are present there, and are performing this function," he said.
"We need to help them (NATO). We should not be fighting there again. Let them sit there and fight."
The Soviet Union fought a disastrous war in Afghanistan in the 1980s and Russia ruled out sending troops to aid the U.S.-led invasion after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
But Moscow has supported the NATO operation by allowing transit across its territory.
It expanded that support with an agreement that took effect on Wednesday allowing the alliance to use a transit hub in Ulyanovsk to send non-lethal supplies in and out of Afghanistan using the Russian rail network and air transport.
Supply routes are particularly important for the NATO operation in Afghanistan and the planned pull-out.
Removing a major headache for the alliance, Pakistan re-opened NATO transit lines via its territory in July after months of closure over NATO air strike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.
Putin said the transit hub agreement, which has drawn criticism from Communists and others saying Russia is allowing an enemy on its territory, in fact benefited Russia - which is otherwise often at loggerheads with the alliance.
"It corresponds to our national interests. On many other issues we have disagreements. We have different approaches, opinions." Putin said, reiterating his description of NATO as a "throwback to the past, to the times of the Cold War".
"We will cooperate with them on other fields, fighting piracy on the sea, international terrorism, organised crime. But we will always follow our national interests," the former KGB spy said.
(Writing by Gabriela Baczynska; Editing by Steve Gutterman and Pravin Char)
- 2nd August 2012 #2Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 448
Re: For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says LOL! Of course he wants them to stay. Because the longer they stay the more likely they will inshAllah end up like the Soviet Union. Once that happens NATO will be nothing in the face of the Russians. Plus the Russians don't want a revival of an Islamic Afghanistan.
- 2nd August 2012 #3Banned
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 831
Re: For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says This perfectly highlights the love hate relationship that Russia has with NATO.
- 3rd August 2012 #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 27
Re: For Russian fanboys NATO should finish job in Afghanistan, Putin says the russians know its not too far away now that the afghan mujahideen will be coming their way for revenge!
inshallah.
Similar Threads
-
"No NATO, No War": U.S. Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Return War Medals at NATO Summit
By Wild Wild West in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 2Last Post: 22nd May 2012, 02:49 AM -
why NATO will be in Afghanistan for the next 500 years
By abu hadeed in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 5Last Post: 17th June 2011, 06:53 PM -
Two Russian subs seen patrolling off US coast - russian nuclear submarines, cold war again?
By FOS in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 1Last Post: 5th August 2009, 02:51 PM -
Afghanistan: Nato's graveyard
By Ibn malik in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 2Last Post: 3rd April 2009, 02:57 AM -
NATO Genocide in Afghanistan
By AbuUsama in forum Politics, Jihad and Current AffairsReplies: 1Last Post: 21st March 2008, 06:21 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks