Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree Warns Against Anwar al-Awlaki

[AsadAllah]

Asad that is a very good vid you got from youtube.

Which one bro? Ill send you my youtube channel in PM.

[abdulrahman al muhajir]

These rambling dogs have nothing better to do

[anam]

i like the way they spelt the Imams name in dripping blood red font lol

trademark of madkhali literature

[abdulrahman al muhajir]

Theres always a sign in their rubbish

[Ibn Turab]

As Slaam u alikum

“they just do not understand”!

It is the sad reality that most Muslims cannot think outside the kuffar-originated “secular nation state” concept. Their entire work based on this false notation that this concept is legal under Islamic law.

For these Muslims it is perfectly okay to have a fragmented Ummah with countless pathetic tiny countries run by the kuffar agents. Not surprisingly Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree equating Saudi nation state with the legitimate Global Islamic State (Khilafah)! Last time I check Islamic State suppose to OPEN for the ENTIRE Ummah and even for the kuffar who wants to live under the protection and Justice of Islam.

Since when in the Islamic History Muslim interests are perfectly aligned with the kuffar who are actively attacking Muslims. Now Kuffar are calling Imam Anwar al Awlaki a terrorist and some “Muslims” are also calling him terrorist! Funny it means that the kuffar and these so called Muslims got the common enemy!

2:33 to 3:23 selected video clip 3 transcripts inside [ ]

[“I warn the Muslims firstly against this man and I call upon them to boycott him and to sever ties with him and to refute him with the knowledge based refutation.”]

This warning came on Dhul Qadah 23, 1430 the fifth day after the Foot Hood incident. I guess Shaykh is really upset because 13 dead killers will not be able to go to Iraq and what good Shaykh thinks about the Muslims in Iraq check this out NEWS \ Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree on the Position Towards Iraq. I am sure Shaykh is not thrill about Imam Anwar al Awlaki’s “bad” Islamic manners in defending a fellow Muslim at Foot Hood.

[“That will expose his dawah and reveal his true condition and show that he is an enemy to the people of Islam and Sunnah. And this refutation must show that he and his likes are from those who disfigured the image of Islam and the image of the people of Islam to the extent that they have driven those who do not posses intellect from Jews and Christians to attack the personality of the Messenger of Allah. And they have degraded the mushaf due to their lack of intellect and due to their lack of knowledge about Islam and its people.”]

Here Shaykh is telling us how much the image of Islam is damaged by Imam Anwar al Awlaki, I will list some of the incident that are ‘caused’ by Imam Anwar al Awlaki

Ramadan 1414: on this Friday Baruch Goldstein slaughtered dozens of Muslims in the Masjid (al Khalil city, occupied Palestine)

Muharram 1423: Nine-day Jenin refugee camp massacre by Jews murdering hundreds of innocent Muslims

Dhul Hijjah 1429: three-week Gaza massacre by Jews slaughtering thousands of innocent Muslims

Sorry the list is not complete of the ‘crime’ of Imam Anwar al Awlaki. He provoked them to the extent that ‘innocent’ kuffar had no way out but to kill few thousand ‘terrorist’ Muslims!

[“They think al Awlaki and his predecessors and contemporaries represent the people of Islam, and this path of theirs is the true path of the people of Islam and the attack against the honors and the wealth and the lives and nullifying the contracts and ratifying treaties between our rulers and rest of the non Muslim nation states of the world's such as those of Europe and America.”]


Dhul Qadah 11, 1429 East Jerusalem, Jews evicted elderly Muslim couple Muhammed al Kurd (Abu Kamel) and his wife Fawzieh from their home around 03:00 AM!

Dhul Qadah 24, 1430 Abu Kamel passed away and on the same day al Daoudi family in east Jerusalem lost their home this Muslim was living there since 1348.

Shaban 10, 1430 East Jerusalem suburbs Sheikh Jarrah, Jews expelled 53 Muslims of Hanoun and al Ghawi families from their homes including 20 children in the predawn hours, at gunpoint.

Last time I check Imam Anwar al Awlaki was not kicking out Muslims families from their homes in east Jerusalem. Shaykh should remind these kuffar about the treaties and contracts may be they just forget!

4:47 to 5:23 selected video clip 3 transcripts inside [ ]

[“So how astonishing is it that America let this man remain there in yet it raises it voice to say that it opposes terrorism.”]

Mashallah here a Muslim Shaykh irritated that how come kuffar did not arrested a fellow Muslim (Imam Anwar al Awlaki)

[“And when we here about such people we say that they are Khawarij since this man and his likes are the terrorist as the Europeans and the Americans and the western people in general and I think that even the non Muslims from the people of the east like Russia have label them with this title.”]

So now we are using the kaffer-coined labels for our fellow Muslims. We will be following the definition of kuffar that who is a good Muslim and who is a terrorist! Perhaps according to this Shaykh if kuffar label any Muslim terrorist then he should be consider terrorist by the Ummah after all they are our best friends.

I guess Quran forgot to mention this point that Jews and Christians are our best friends but what about al Maida 5:51? Hey stop do not ask about this verse or you will be consider a terrorist a Khariji just like Imam Anwar al Awlaki!

It is strange that in the Islamic history Khawarij use to fight with legitimate Muslim ruler but had no any issues with kuffar. However in our time the “Khawarij” causing major headache to kuffar and calling for united Ummah under global Khilafah State how dare they desire such an “evil” things!

[“So they in reality are the instruments of terrorism. And they are river from which Khawarij draws out what they draw out from attacking the people of Islam and the Sunnah and for attacking those with whom we have contracts and treaties since these one do not recognize any contract and treaty they only declare people disbelievers en mass.”]

Which treaty Shaykh is referring may be the Camp David surrender treaty, treaty to impose the sanction on Iraq killing close to million Muslim children after the first Gulf Muslim massacre or may be he is talking about the treaty between Egypt and illegal Jewish entity on imposing sanction on Gaza!

These ‘terrorists / Khawarij’ are against all the above treaties and contracts between ‘Muslim’ rulers and other non-Muslim nation state. What is wrong with these ‘terrorists’ don’t they see the wisDUP in these surrender treaties

************************************************** *******

Few questions for the Shaykh or his students:

why Kab bin al Ashraf use to verbally attack the Messenger (peace be up on him) is it because of Imam Anwar al Awlaki disfigured the image of Islam?

Muhammad bin Maslamah (may Allah please with him) was he a terrorist? (1)

After his second escape from kuffar to a Saif Al-Bahr, Abu Baseer (may Allah please with him) started Jihad against the pagans without the permission of the leader was he a terrorist second point how come Islamic State did not actively oppose him and join forces with kuffar to arrest him? (2)

(1) Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum by Saifur Rahman al-Mubarakpuri The Military Activities between Badr and Uhud

(2) Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum by Saifur Rahman al-Mubarakpuri Al-Hudaibiyah Treaty

[Abu-Asiya]

Hmm... Another Sheikh comes from oblivion with a "message" and ... goes back. Bye-bye.

yup. like the wise Sheikh Abu-Hamza once said

"gone with the wind, just like he came with the shaytaan"

[justabro]

NEWS \ Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree on the Position Towards Iraq

Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jaabiree on the Position Towards Iraq

From a Paltalk Session today 31/03/2003 at 8:30pm UK Time

Question: O esteemed Shaykh, what is happening now (in Iraaq) so what is the position of the Muslim towards this trial, and is there a Jihaad, and are do those soldiers who are in the Gulf have the ruling of being mujaahideen, and may Allaah reward you.

Shaykh Ubayd al-Jaabiree: I dont know why this question (is asked) when, when we have just ended the speech with what I consider to comprise the answer to it and to its likes. However, despite this, just so that it is said, that Ubayd has neglected some of the questions.

So I say: Firstly, not all of the Iraaqi society is Muslim. Rather, amongst them is the Marxist, amongst them is the Ba'athist Heretic, and amongst them are numerous orientations. And there are Muslims amongst them...

And amongst them are the Raafidah. And the positions of the Scholars towards the Raafidah is well known, amongst them are those who declared them Disbelievers.

Secondly, we have Rulers and those who have authority, and it is obligatory to give them hearing and obedience, and around our rulers are those who have knowledge, and experience, and speciality in the political affairs. So we do not undermine them, and we have already mentioned previously that the general affairs are not for just any person. Rather, they are for whom? For those in authority.

And as it is appropriate, I also say that those who call to cutting off from the products of America and Britain and others, then those people have a resemblance to the Raafidah. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah mentions in Minhaaj us-Sunnah, in the first volume, and I believe it is page 38, "From the stupidity of the Raafidah is that they do not drink from the river that was unearthed (i.e. dug out, like a well) by Yazeed". So those Harakiyyoon and Hizbiyyoon, have resembled the Raafidah. And what an evil model (that is). And the most repugnant for a person that his model, and way is that of the Raafidah.

Thirdly, the banner of fighting in Iraaq, who is carrying it? It is carried by Saddaam Hussain at-Takreetee, and he is the leader of the Ba'athi Party in his land...and the Ba'athi Party, is secularist, disbelieving, heretical. Its foundation is upon mixing and not differentiating between a Sunni Muslim, Guidance from the Scholars Concerning Iraaq and between the Jew, Christian, Communist, and others. They are all the same, equal. And for this reason, their slogan is, as their poet has said:

I believe in, -- (Shaykh Ubayd): I seek refuge in Allaah --
I believe in al-Ba'ath as the Lord which has no partner
And in Arabism as a religion, which has no other (religion)

This is their religion, qawmiyyah (nationalism) and shu'oobiyyah, and their religion is not Islaam. So built upon this, the one who fights under the banner of the Iraaqi government, then he is fighting under a banner of disbelief. And we do not dispute that the people of Iraaq have the right to defend themselves. They can defend themselves, their blood, their honour and their wealth, they can defend those who transgress upon them, whether America or Britain or other than them.

So it is obligatory upon us, the community of Muslims that we ask Allaah in our supplication that He delivers the Muslims amongst the people of Iraaq. So whoever said O Allaah save the [Iraaqi Society]1 , then he has erred. This supplication of his reaches even the Marxist and the Communist. And the Ba'ath Party is at the front of the [supplication of the] one who supplicates for the Iraaqi society (in general). No, but supplicate to Allaah that He delivers the Muslims amongst the people of Iraaq. And that he relieves them of their distress. This is what I can add now.

What a joke!!! This just proves what a blithering idiot this Ubayd al-Jabiri character is

[Wild Wild West]

What a joke!!! This just proves what a blithering idiot this Ubayd al-Jabiri character is

A Muslim Noam Chomsky he aint.

[justabro]

note how he makes takfir of the Iraqi masses for being Rafidi, Ba'thist, Arab nationalist, etc. but the wali al-amr is a true believer, irrespective of whatever flavor of the month the Americans choose to put in power.

[SunniHammer]

Who cares what this pompous Saudi gimp says anyway.The day he comes out of his air conditioned house and faces the same hardships and sacrifice as Anwar al Awlaki, then i will contemplate listening to him.

Just out of curiosity... does anybody actually still take fatwas coming out of Saudi Arabia seriously?