Qardawi's lawfull and prohibited in Islaam and the many weak hadith found within

[anam]

http://muttaqun.com/qa/qaradawi-qa.html

[Abdullah Ali al Hanafi]

http://muttaqun.com/qa/qaradawi-qa.html

thats a quite long list of weak ahadith , so its better to avoid the book?

[anam]

Allahu Allaam

Maybe someone else could answer

[Abu Zahra Al Soomaalee]

Nope, It's an excellent book. This checking is according to Shaikh Albani ( R.A).

Al Halaal Wal Haraam contains 484 Hadiths or close to it. 5 Hadiths he didn't provide the authenticity. 2 hadiths he said he didn't finish his research on them. 1 hadith he said that he said he couldn't find it with those exact words. 68 hadith he said that they are weak. 378 he said were Authentic or Sahih. As you can see that the book, does not contain a large number of weak hadiths according to Albani. This is according to the research of some of the scholars.

I will talk more about those hadiths that Albani said were weak.

[Abu Najm Muhammad]

Nope, It's an excellent book. This checking is according to Shaikh Albani ( R.A).

378 he said were Authentic or Sahih ... This is according to the research of some of the scholars.

Some of know how al-'Albaanee, mercy upon him, is as a muhaqiq, however no one knows how 'some' scholars are...

It seems as if you were establishing a hujjah by itself by saying that 'oh, it was al-'Albaanee'...?

Qaradhawee may be a Faqeeh, but we are talking about 'Ahaadeeth, and al-'Albaanee tips the scales between the two...

[Pluma]

Madhhab of taysiir = not a good book.

[Abu Zahra Al Soomaalee]

Asalaam Alaykum,

It's not about the scholars who said this, it's just the details about the Tasheeh and tadh'eef of the work of Albani. I also agree that Albani is greater in hadeeth than Al Qaradawi. Qaradawi, humbly agrees to this statement. He calls Albani the Famous, Great Muhadith in a number of his works. But, that doesn't mean he cannot disagree with some of his methods and results.

If I were agree on your logic, it would be OK if Al Qaradawi goes that Salaah is not waajib, we all have to go...''he is a faqeeh, so we don't say anything''!!

Many of the Ahaadith that Albani makes dha'eef have been made sahih or hasan by other scholars (E.g Ibn Hajar), others Qaradawi has just mentioned to show that it is dha'eef and yet, others he mentioned for showing what the different Madhaahibs use as proof. And for each of these we can give examples!!

[Abu Zahra Al Soomaalee]

And by the way Shaikh Yusuf Al Qaradawi Hafithahullah is a Faqeeh and a Muhadith, even though his fiqh supercedes his hadith by miles.

( I do realise that I am the first one to claim this on this forum, but with sufficient evidence). Wallah A'lam.

[Abu Treika]

And by the way Shaikh Yusuf Al Qaradawi Hafithahullah is a Faqeeh and a Muhadith, even though his fiqh supercedes his hadith by miles.

( I do realise that I am the first one to claim this on this forum, but with sufficient evidence). Wallah A'lam.

thats unfair to this forum, i dont think may on this forum have questioned shaikh qardawis level of knowledge on this forum, but many have found his political fataawa to be ambiguous and have been left unsure which side he is on sometimes due to the ambiguous nature of his literature

allah knows best

[celt islam]

http://muttaqun.com/qa/qaradawi-qa.html

Well Qaradawi is not my fave but this salaafi'ite interpretation of hadith is weak itself as the salaafi'ite sect doesnt have a linage of teaching back to Sayyiduna Muhammad [saw] as do the Madhab'ib