Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

This is a discussion on Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed within the Islam in General forums, part of the Main Topics category; YouTube - Nikah with sister is allowed ( Wahabi Aalim ..Talib Ur Rehman's new fatwa.)...... wat a shame!!!...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3

    Default Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed


  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    28
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    why does his video continoulsy repeat itself without allowing "wahabi molvi" to reply? y does that stupid brelwi stand and shout to make his point... these juhall bralwees may ALLAH guide them and you !

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    can u look at the video at 1.00 mins the molvi replies and he is tryin to justify that its allowed, may allah guide him and you...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B_9LVDUJ5k

    full video look at 6.45min
    Last edited by puremuslim; 13th May 2010 at 05:52 PM.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    28
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    No u listen to the video again... do u even know which one talib ur rehman is?if not find out who he is and then c if he even says one word throughout this whole repeated bralwee propaganda crap...what is a wahabi by the way oh mr PURE islam?

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    28
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    maybe my punjabi is rusty where has he tried to justify this haram action ?? this whole video is being filmed by a bralwi so u can not see what talib is saying dont be insincere to the truth in your hate of wahabis...

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    I watched the complete debate .... so mr impuremuslim dont try to fool people and even i asked this question to sheikh talib ur rahman personally... THAT FATWA WASA REGARDING RAZA'EE SISTER.... where suppose there are two suckling brothers born to different women... so one can marry the others sister...
    Sheikh-ul-Islam ibn Taymiyyah(rahimahullaah) said[/U] :[/B] "Refuting ahlul-bida' (the innovators) is a Jihad, to the extent that Yahyaa ibn Yahyaa (d.226H) said: 'Defence of the Sunnah is more excellent than Jihad in the path of Allah'" [Naqdul-Mataq wal-Kalaam]

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    Quote Originally Posted by mujahid24 View Post
    maybe my punjabi is rusty where has he tried to justify this haram action ?? this whole video is being filmed by a bralwi so u can not see what talib is saying dont be insincere to the truth in your hate of wahabis...
    talib ur rahman is the one with the white long beard...

    Quote Originally Posted by salafees_orthodox_muslims View Post
    I watched the complete debate .... so mr impuremuslim dont try to fool people and even i asked this question to sheikh talib ur rahman personally... THAT FATWA WASA REGARDING RAZA'EE SISTER.... where suppose there are two suckling brothers born to different women... so one can marry the others sister...
    YOU CANNOT MARRY YOUR RAZA'EE SISTER!!! UR GOING AGAINST HADEES!!!! U DIDNT EVEN KNOW WATS THE PROPER MEANING OF RAZA'EE!!!! even if she is the sister of the raza'ee brother still she like our own sister!!!

    r u sure u watched the whole debate? why dont u tell us that wat happened in the debate, Hanif Qureshi proofed that wahabi books contain shirk and kuffr, and mujahid24 is sayin i hate wahabis, lol

    go on tell us wat happened at the end of the debate, how talib ur rahman himself said those wahabi scholars who said these kuffr and shirk things shud be called kafir...

    YouTube - 29. Mufti Hanif Qureshi Qadri (Sunni) Vs Talib-ur-Rehman (Wahabi Ahlehadis) CD-5/7 (6)

    this part of the debate itself shows how much kuffr and shirk these wahabi scholar write...
    Last edited by puremuslim; 13th May 2010 at 08:25 PM.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    Assalaamu 'alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu,



    This seems like a typical bashing of groups based on a number of tools of propaganda. This is known from the People of Innovation who love to pinpoint particular things and magnify them in a way that is deceiving in order for it to confuse/mislead the masses. Not only is this a disgusting quality in any Muslim, but it also shows the lengths that the people of falsehood will go to, in order to make fitnah. Allaah protect us from losing our principles for the sake of fitnah, Ameen.



    What are our principles?



    1. Establishing certainty through facts: This is agreed upon clearly from many verses, ahaadeeth and principles outlined by the scholars. Whenever a claim is made, it needs to be proven, it also needs to be established in its utmost details of claim. I.E: everything needs to be proven to have been said, as claimed, in the context of the claim and in the manner of the claim, or it is blameworthy for slander. The claim also has to be reflective of exactly what happened and not a "reading between the lines" or "filling in the blanks" using our own reasoning.



    2. Good assumption, husn adh-dhann: We always have a good assumption of another Muslim, especially one known for sticking to the texts and to the usool as-Sunnah. If a person is accused of something, we cannot just assume it to be true, but also if it does turn out to be true, what are the possible reasons for it? We are commanded to go by the lenient excuses for any matter being said. This is a key principle in Jarh wa Ta'deel also, if there are a number of possibilities of explanation we take the best, most dignified one, not the worst case scenario.


    3. Forbiddance of relaying information until the issue has been addressed: This links to the first point I mentioned, because we dont know of what exactly was said or what was meant, what really occurred, to further publicly speak about it is equally haraam also.


    4. If all of these cases apply to an individual, we must hear his explanation and exemption from blame: For example, if it turns out that this in its explicit and direct claim is in fact totally true, then we must directly question the person involved, ask what he means by it, ask for an explanation as to why he concluded it as his point. This is because he may have a reason for having that opinion, a hadeeth, a scholarly understanding or a purpose, you cannot simply dismiss it as "Kufr" and "wrong" until you have reviewed the evidences of the opposing party. This is also from the Ahkaam regarding Jarh wa Ta'deel and differing in opinions.


    5. Is it a matter in which there is difference of opinion?: I mean here that there may be some scholastic reasoning behind the taking of a particular view. Just because it may be worded in a direct sense in the Qur'an, it does not mean that it is completely based on that alone. EG killing a believer is described as disbelief in many places, but we know that killing is not kufr al-Akbar. So if there is a difference of opinion, we can say the person is incorrect based on evidences, but we cannot censure him for taking that opinion as there is a difference between ulamaa on it.



    Now from these principles we have established how our stance should be.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    Back to this post, the scandal and the video


    A. All we are shown is some random paper, with urdu on it that apparently shows Taalibur-Rahmaan's fatwa for saying a person can marry his sister. We do not see it, nor the information on it, nor are we presented in this forum, any transcript for that very fatwa. Yet the brother is adamant that Taalibur-Rahmaan said this. So we dont even know if thats what Taalibur-Rahmaan said.


    B. The video itself has been clearly uploaded by a proponent of the Qadri camp, as such the person has deliberately captioned the entire discussion. This is also very questionable. Why has the person cut out the responses to the claimant? We know that the debate is not finished there and there is much more to it. So why not fulfill the requirements of establishing the proof, by allowing the full discussion, atleast at that moment to be shown? SubhaanAllaah Dawud [alayhis salaam] made sajdah of tawbah for not hearing both parties in issuing a decree, but these brothers are "establishing kufr" upon a person without even showing the remaining discussion!



    C. The good assumption allows us to maintain that Taalibur-Rahmaan has an explanation as he always has a backing for his opinions as is seen from him in general. So in the meantime we cannot go around on an internet fitnah campaign discrediting him on this till he explains himself and this opinion as: 1. True or not, 2. Misconstrued or not, 3. Based on evidences or not. Until then we need to be careful about our speech as it falls into the category of slander. Also the Brelwis are known for doing propaganda campaigns against people of Sunnah by distortion and misplaced slanders. If a group is known to be deceptive doesnt that require us to be even more diligent and analaytical of their accusations?



    D. We have in this post a brother "Puremuslim" who has broken the bonafide principles within our deen in order to propagate fitnah against this "Wahhaabi" Imaam because he opposes him with so much enmity that it glosses over his understanding of the principles Islaam came with. Also, this brother also starts self analysing the event by adding more fuel by saying that a person on the Ahlul-hadeeth camp was justifying it. Where is this seen on the video? All we see is a person who was among them saying words back to the claimant. This does not equate to justification of the claim it is just a man saying words back to a person accusing his Imaam of committing kufr in such an inherently deceptive way.



    E. What equally shows the disgusting nature of the people of bid'ah is that this issue has become rampant now on the internet. Just by typing a search you see a link to these cut and edited videos everywhere, articles talking about this snippet, speaking without any sense of principle on this issue. They are also, quite noticeably all sites that are linked to the camp that brought the claim in the first place!



    SubhanAllaah is this justice and dhabt fid deen? Allaahu Musta'an.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Wahabi Molvi Talib ur Rahman's new fatwa - Nikah with Sister is Allowed

    Implementing our Principles

    - Bring the full discussion to the table. Lets see what was said in totality. Lets see Taalibur-Rahmaan's response to this.

    - Present all the proofs of the exact statements of Taalibur-Rahmaan about the issue he is accused of. Take it to the scholars of the Sunnah and ask them for advice concerning it.

    - Analyse that using the Qur'an and Sunnah based on the understanding of the Salaf. What is the strongest opinion on it?

    - Conclude whether the claimant infact lied against Taalibur-Rahmaan in which case the person's evil nature is clear to the masses. Or whether his claim is true which would mean we would leave the incorrect opinion and follow the truth. Since we are not like the people of innovation, we always follow the truth whether some of our scholars were wrong or not. It doesnt matter to us, if Abu hanifa made the mistake or Ibn Taymiyyah, a mistake is a mistake and must not be followed.



    Conclusion

    Let us remember that there are people out there bent on deceiving the masses by argumentation, by false proofs, and by twisting words to distort meanings. People have distorted the Names and Attributes of Allaah, so its obvious they will distort ahaadeeth, aayaat, statements of the scholars and people of the Sunnah to fulfill their worldly aims.

    Let us remember that all people make mistakes big or small, this does not disprove a person's scholarship per se. An-Nawawi made mistakes on categorising bid'ahs, Abu hanifa made mistakes concerning belief in eemaan and many fiqh issues, Maalik also made mistakes on usool al fiqh, this does not mean we abandon them or warn against them but we look at their contributions as a whole:

    i. Are they generally people who always follow Qur'an and Sunnah as understood by the Salaf?


    ii. Are they generally calling to innovations and deviations?


    iii. Are they basing knowledge on solid principles and proofs or vague points and strange interpretations?


    iv. Are they submissive to evidence, i.e amend their mistakes and admit it and correct it or bent on their ways regardless?

    This will give us some idea as to whether that person is infact a sincere and honest person or one who is corrupt and wishing to corrupt others. May Allaah allow us to be fair and just in our affairs, Ameen.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. current wala molvi
    By Abdullah11 in forum Islam in General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 5th May 2010, 09:25 AM
  2. Question How many wives did 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (r.a) have?
    By DhulQarNain in forum Hadith Sciences
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 5th October 2009, 11:21 PM
  3. Nikah Over the Internet
    By bamshaheed in forum Islamic Law
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15th November 2008, 06:14 AM
  4. Breaking News! Sh. Omar Abdul Rahman's Health Deteriorates
    By Abu Shu'aib in forum Global Affairs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 1st November 2008, 10:15 PM
  5. This is a true talib ul ilm...
    By Navaid Aziz in forum Islam in General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20th October 2008, 03:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42